Misplaced Pages

Talk:The Godfather: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:21, 7 December 2005 editDirk Diggler Jnr (talk | contribs)472 edits Soundtrack should be credited← Previous edit Revision as of 15:04, 9 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,385 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:The Godfather/Archive 5) (botNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{oldpeerreview}} {{Talkheader}}
{{facfailed}}
==Forked Article==


{{ArticleHistory
The content of this article was ''forked'' from another article, ]. Please see that article's page history for contributor information for parts of this article.
|action1=PR
|action1date=16 August 2005
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/The Godfather/archive1
|action1result=reviewed
|action1oldid=21143374


|action2=FAC
==Cast List==
|action2date=September 3 2005
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/The Godfather/archive1
|action2result=failed
|action2oldid=22472734


|action3=GAN
I'm thinking that the '''See Also''' section ought to be used for the more notable among the cast, e.g. ], ] and of course ]. Perhaps a selective cast list could go under the '''Casting''' section, to avoid clogging up the bottom of the article? ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 10:55, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
|action3date=June 23 2006
*Certainly sounds reasonable. Perhaps a seperate cast section should be added instead of listed under See Also ? ] 20:53, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
|action3link=Talk:The Godfather/Archive 1#Failed GA
**I'll get onto this later today. ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 02:30, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
|action3result=failed
***Done. ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 12:36, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
|action3oldid=60763282


|action4=PR
==References==
|action4date=March 13 2007
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/The Godfather/archive2
|action4result=reviewed
|action4oldid=114710440


|action5=PR
I'm now in the awkward position of trying to fill up the ''References'' section for this article. As I didn't write most of the content (forked from another article), this is going to be difficult. All help is therefore welcome. A brief read-through suggests references for the following claims will be needed, at the very least:
|action5date=January 21, 2017
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/The Godfather/archive3
|action5result=reviewed


|action6=GAN
*''Pacino was only granted the role after Coppola threatened to quit the production.''
|action6date=April 10 2020
*''It was voted greatest film of all time by Entertainment Weekly, and #3 of all time by the American Film Institute. It is consistently, and currently, ranked #1 on IMDB's Top 250.''
|action6link=Talk:The Godfather/GA1
*''Coppola stated that the horse's head was delivered to him from a dog food company; a horse had not been killed especially for the movie.''
|action6result=passed
*''Mafia families began a "real life" tradition of paying respect to the family don by kissing his ring, in imitation of the opening scene of The Godfather.''
|action6oldid=950054730


|otd1date=2010-03-15|otd1oldid=349863230|otd2date=2011-03-15|otd2oldid=419036810|otd3date=2014-03-15|otd3oldid=599536847|otd4date=2017-03-15|otd4oldid=770364934
All pointers welcome. ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 12:36, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
|otd5date=2022-03-15|otd5oldid=1077030410
|action7 = FAC
|action7date = 2024-10-27
|action7link = Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/The Godfather/archive2
|action7result = failed
|action7oldid = 1253439950
|currentstatus=FFAC/GA


|topic=media and drama
== Redirection ==
}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Film|core=yes|American=yes}}
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=low|organizedcrime=yes|organizedcrime-imp=Low}}
{{WikiProject Library of Congress|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject New York City|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Sicily|importance=Mid}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Mid|USFilm=Yes|USFilm-importance=Top}}
}}
{{annual readership}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}}
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|counter = 5
|minthreadsleft = 2
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(180d)
|archive = Talk:The Godfather/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn
|target=Talk:The Godfather/Archive index
|mask=Talk:The Godfather/Archive <#>
|leading_zeros=0
|indexhere=yes
}}


== Nomination for ] ==
It is ridiculous for ] to redirect here. Either ] should be a disambiguation page, or this page should be at ]. I think either is defensible, but it is not defensible to have the main title redirecting to a disambiguated title. What on earth is the point of the disambiguated title in this case? ] ] 21:33, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
:There, happy? - ] ] 22:01, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
::Quite. ] ] 06:14, 25 August 2005 (UTC)


Nominating for FA. ] (]) 20:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
== Differences from the novel? ==


{{ping|Betty Logan}} {{ping|Mazewaxie}} {{ping|Vaselineeeeeeee}} {{ping|Wrath X}}
Would it be a good idea to add (either here or on the entry for the novel) a run down of the differences between the film and book? ] 21:11, 20 November 2005 (UTC) RossN
I think the article is in pretty good shape, would any of you like to bring it to ] status?
See ]. ] (]) 22:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)


== Original Soundtrack == == Opening Paragraph ==


As noted in the article, this film is one of the greatest and most influential films of all time. Yet, the article's entire first paragraph makes absolutely no note of this. Has this issue been discussed before? ] (]) 01:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I feel the soundtrack is an incredibly important part of the film also, it is equally deeply beautiful, haunting, moving and forboding. Does anyone else think it should have greater acknowledgement in this The Godfather page ? ] 06:21, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

:Its influence and the regard it is held in is covered by the fourth paragraph in the lead. I don't see this as an issue as these elements as a rule are not discussed in the opening paragraph. Indeed, ] (by which GA status is assessed) recommends covering these aspects after the opening paragraph, and states "Summarize awards and achievements using proper context in a ''later'' paragraph" . Obviously there are many valid ways of writing a lead, but the lead in this article follows a common format. ] (]) 02:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
::@] Thank you. The resource you linked is helpful and I can see where the first paragraph is uniform. However, to me at least, it is obvious that the fourth paragraph should be move to second. The film's acclaim is of far more notability than the standard intrigue and deal making that accompanies many film productions. One example of what I'm suggesting is the ] article. Your thoughts? ] (]) 03:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:04, 9 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Godfather article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 6 months 
Former featured article candidateThe Godfather is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleThe Godfather has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 16, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
September 3, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 23, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
March 13, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
January 21, 2017Peer reviewReviewed
April 10, 2020Good article nomineeListed
October 27, 2024Featured article candidateNot promoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 15, 2010, March 15, 2011, March 15, 2014, March 15, 2017, and March 15, 2022.
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article
This  level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconFilm: Core / American
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Taskforce icon
This article is on the project's core list.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconLibrary of Congress Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Library of Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Library of Congress on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Library of CongressWikipedia:WikiProject Library of CongressTemplate:WikiProject Library of CongressLibrary of Congress
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconNew York City Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconSicily Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sicily, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sicily on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SicilyWikipedia:WikiProject SicilyTemplate:WikiProject SicilySicily
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Cinema Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Top-importance).


Nomination for FA

Nominating for FA. Caleb Stanford (talk) 20:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

@Betty Logan: @Mazewaxie: @Vaselineeeeeeee: @Wrath X: I think the article is in pretty good shape, would any of you like to bring it to FA status? See discussion here. Caleb Stanford (talk) 22:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Opening Paragraph

As noted in the article, this film is one of the greatest and most influential films of all time. Yet, the article's entire first paragraph makes absolutely no note of this. Has this issue been discussed before? Johnadams11 (talk) 01:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Its influence and the regard it is held in is covered by the fourth paragraph in the lead. I don't see this as an issue as these elements as a rule are not discussed in the opening paragraph. Indeed, MOS:FILMLEAD (by which GA status is assessed) recommends covering these aspects after the opening paragraph, and states "Summarize awards and achievements using proper context in a later paragraph" . Obviously there are many valid ways of writing a lead, but the lead in this article follows a common format. Betty Logan (talk) 02:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
@Betty Logan Thank you. The resource you linked is helpful and I can see where the first paragraph is uniform. However, to me at least, it is obvious that the fourth paragraph should be move to second. The film's acclaim is of far more notability than the standard intrigue and deal making that accompanies many film productions. One example of what I'm suggesting is the Citizen Kane article. Your thoughts? Johnadams11 (talk) 03:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: