| Revision as of 02:48, 3 December 2024 editZ1720 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators29,970 edits →Good article reassessment for Louvre: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:17, 9 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,478 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Visual arts/Archive 21) (bot | ||
| (22 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
| What do you think? | What do you think? | ||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 16:48, 5 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Discussion of relationship between ], ] and ] == | |||
| There is a discussion on the relationship between The arts, Art and Visual arts at ] that may interest members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 13:27, 10 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Desperate work needed on the page ]. == | |||
| The page for "]" is in a depressing state. When compared to pages for "]" and "]" it is obviously below the quality we should expect. Even compared to more specific occupations, such as "]", "]," and "]," the page for Artist looks embarrassingly thin and poorly sourced. For example, Artist has an entire section on "Dictionary definitions" that seems to copy paste dictionary definitions from the '']'' without actually citing the dictionary, or quoting its definitions. | |||
| I understand that some high level articles don't get much attention as people are more interested in their niche interests, but this is among the worst pages I've seen on Misplaced Pages for topics that are taught at the elementary school level. The park by my university has a more comprehensive page. It is beyond my expertise to bring this page up to the level I'd expect for such an important topic, so I'm posting it here in the hopes it attracts the attention of an expert in ], or ]. Thank you for your help and time. ] <sup> (]) </sup> 18:58, 10 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ''Brachiosaurus Replica'' == | |||
| There's an ongoing discussion about the creation of '']'' at ], if any project members are interested. Happy editing! ---] <sub>(])</sub> 16:22, 11 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 15:49, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Featured list candidate == | |||
| ''']''' has been nominated as a {{#switch: FLC | FAC = ] | FLC = ] | FPC = ] }}; the nomination can be found ''']'''. Since the {{#switch: FLC | FAC = article | FLC = list | FPC = picture }} falls under this WikiProject's scope, I am posting this notice here. It currently needs more comments, so if you've got time, ''']'''. Thanks in advance! ]]<small></small> 13:47, 17 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] ] 01:11, 31 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Recent political art in the U.S. == | |||
| Some links to newly created articles about recent political art in the U.S., if anyone's interested in helping out: | |||
| * '']'' | |||
| * '']'' | |||
| * '']'' | |||
| * '']'' | |||
| --] <sub>(])</sub> 18:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :] now at AfD ---] <sub>(])</sub> 14:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Help improving my first article, on artist Amikam Toren == | |||
| Hello, I’m an aspiring Misplaced Pages content creator and complete beginner. This is my first article and I would welcome all criticism and advice on how I can improve. I still have some citations to source for this – these are marked by * in the text. | |||
| What am I getting wrong about the ISBN’s cited here? | |||
| My interests are Contemporary Art, Physics, Philosophy and Literature. ] (]) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :The issue with the ISBNs was that you put "ISBN" in the data field after the "isbn=". You don't need to do that, the Wikimedia markup software inserts that automatically for you when it renders the page. | |||
| :<code>|isbn=978-1-9993285-2-8</code> is correct. | |||
| :<code>|isbn='''ISBN''' 978-1-9993285-2-8</code> is incorrect. | |||
| :Hope that helps in the future. (I've already fixed it in your draft.) | |||
| :] (]) 20:35, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Oh thank you so much! That is really helpful. ] (]) 20:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! == | |||
| {| style="background:#FFFFFF; border:2px solid #000080; padding: 10px; width: 100%" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| Hello,<br>Please note that ''']''', which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the ''']'''. The article is ] to appear on Misplaced Pages's ] in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! <!-- Substituted from Template:AFI project notice --><br /> | |||
| <sub>Delivered by <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <b>] <sup>]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 00:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team</sub> | |||
| |- | |||
| |} | |||
| == Infobox == | == Infobox == | ||
| Line 129: | Line 61: | ||
| :You should add a "name" field. That way, if the page title contains a ] or is a shortened version of the full name, it can be manually overridden in the infobox. ] (]) 15:31, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | :You should add a "name" field. That way, if the page title contains a ] or is a shortened version of the full name, it can be manually overridden in the infobox. ] (]) 15:31, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :Repeating my comment elsewhere: "Personally, I'd much rather not see this, or anything like it, used. Almost everything in it will be disputable or disputed, or is really vague. It seems a classic example of where an infobox is just unhelpful clutter, and will displace or make too small an image that would be more helpful." ] (]) 17:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | :Repeating my comment elsewhere: "Personally, I'd much rather not see this, or anything like it, used. Almost everything in it will be disputable or disputed, or is really vague. It seems a classic example of where an infobox is just unhelpful clutter, and will displace or make too small an image that would be more helpful." ] (]) 17:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. <b>~</b> <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">] (] ⋅])</span> 12:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Joining WikiProjects question == | == Joining WikiProjects question == | ||
| Line 139: | Line 67: | ||
| ::To join this project, all you have to do is add your name to the ] on the project page. Joining other projects is the same, but some other projects have their participants lists on separate subpages. You can find more Wikiprojects at the ]. ] (]) 03:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | ::To join this project, all you have to do is add your name to the ] on the project page. Joining other projects is the same, but some other projects have their participants lists on separate subpages. You can find more Wikiprojects at the ]. ] (]) 03:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ==WikiProject template use== | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| Should the visual arts Wikiproject template be added to the talk page of films such as '] and others which focus on painting, sculpture, or visual artists? I'd say yes, and if nobody "stops me before I template again" will add it to such films at some point. Had already placed it on the '']'' page when I thought of asking here. Thanks. ] (]) 12:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 02:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Review/Feedback: Cady Noland == | |||
| Hi y'all -- just popping in to say I'm looking for feedback on the ] article, I recently revamped/greatly expanded it and have been awaiting GA review. Any feedback is welcome to help improve it, I'm trying to get a handle on how to craft a complex artist bio completely and correctly (this is my second attempt after ]), I really enjoy doing this so I want to be sure I'm getting everything correct style- and structure-wise so I can repeat this process with some other high-profile artists with languishing articles (in addition to lesser known artists and those needing new articles, but obviously it's a different task when dealing with an artist on whom there is an abundance of literature). Thanks! ] (]) 14:54, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Good article? {{u|19h00s}}, your extensive work on the page deserves a Feature. Noland's work is...interesting...and then I saw what some of it was auctioned for, which moves it to "Interesting!". ] (]) 15:37, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :You have made great improvements to this article! I will try to look at it more closely soon and make additional edits or leave any suggestions I have on the talk page. Good luck with the good article review! ] (]) 15:47, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :As is often the case, the lead is rather short for an article of this length. ] (]) 18:21, 13 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:17, 9 January 2025
 | Related discussions: |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
|
|
| This WikiProject was featured on the WikiProject report at the Signpost on 4 June 2012. |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21 |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Different artworks? Different pages?..
Hello editors,
I have a question about Follow my dreams page. It is about a hand-painted mural by the italian artist TVBoy in 2022 in the city of Barcelona. This mural was originally called "Super Alexia" where you could read in the background the phrase: "Follow your dreams" with the footballer Alexia Putellas stepped out painted in a Superwoman outfit with a cape clearly visible on her back. In 2023, due to the multitude of vandalism acts, the artist decided to redo the mural, but neither the phrase nor the drawing of the player were the same. You can see the clear differences with the 2022 painting: and the 2023 updated painting:
In the Talk:Follow my dreams I proposed to make different articles because the new painting of 2023 should be treated as a completely different one even if it is located in the same place and on top of the old painting. The painting and the message in the background is totally different as you can read in the article:
Throughout history, many painters have painted over other paintings and they have never been treated as updates of these but yes as a different works. It is currently an active dispute with user Kingsif that recently moved the page (Super Alexia to Follow my dreams) and reverses the edits I made because he wants to fix the date of the old 2022 painting but the name "Follow my dreams" was created in the year 2023 not in 2022.
What do you think?
Infobox
Hello. I would like some feedback on an infobox for artist collectives currently in my sandbox. Does it seem suitable for publishing Thank you. -- NotCharizard 14:32, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- You should add a "name" field. That way, if the page title contains a parenthetical disambiguation or is a shortened version of the full name, it can be manually overridden in the infobox. GranCavallo (talk) 15:31, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Repeating my comment elsewhere: "Personally, I'd much rather not see this, or anything like it, used. Almost everything in it will be disputable or disputed, or is really vague. It seems a classic example of where an infobox is just unhelpful clutter, and will displace or make too small an image that would be more helpful." Johnbod (talk) 17:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Joining WikiProjects question
- Hewo! I have a question: how do I join a project? Bella. (talk) 02:25, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
- To join this project, all you have to do is add your name to the Participants list on the project page. Joining other projects is the same, but some other projects have their participants lists on separate subpages. You can find more Wikiprojects at the WikiProject Directory. GranCavallo (talk) 03:11, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
WikiProject template use
Should the visual arts Wikiproject template be added to the talk page of films such as 'Lust for Life (1956 film) and others which focus on painting, sculpture, or visual artists? I'd say yes, and if nobody "stops me before I template again" will add it to such films at some point. Had already placed it on the Thomas Crown Affair page when I thought of asking here. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Review/Feedback: Cady Noland
Hi y'all -- just popping in to say I'm looking for feedback on the Cady Noland article, I recently revamped/greatly expanded it and have been awaiting GA review. Any feedback is welcome to help improve it, I'm trying to get a handle on how to craft a complex artist bio completely and correctly (this is my second attempt after Sam Gilliam), I really enjoy doing this so I want to be sure I'm getting everything correct style- and structure-wise so I can repeat this process with some other high-profile artists with languishing articles (in addition to lesser known artists and those needing new articles, but obviously it's a different task when dealing with an artist on whom there is an abundance of literature). Thanks! 19h00s (talk) 14:54, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Good article? 19h00s, your extensive work on the page deserves a Feature. Noland's work is...interesting...and then I saw what some of it was auctioned for, which moves it to "Interesting!". Randy Kryn (talk) 15:37, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- You have made great improvements to this article! I will try to look at it more closely soon and make additional edits or leave any suggestions I have on the talk page. Good luck with the good article review! Asparagusstar (talk) 15:47, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- As is often the case, the lead is rather short for an article of this length. Johnbod (talk) 18:21, 13 December 2024 (UTC)