| Revision as of 20:37, 21 August 2024 editBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,256 edits →AN3 decision: rp← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 21:45, 9 January 2025 edit undoMalcolmxl5 (talk | contribs)Administrators149,241 edits →Thomas Partey: Thanks.Tag: Reply |
| (169 intermediate revisions by 52 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|maxarchivesize = 30K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 30K |
|
|counter = 95 |
|
|counter = 97 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|algo = old(48h) |
|
|algo = old(48h) |
| Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Block == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Block with. All project ] (]) 11:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
== Your closing comment left me confused == |
|
|
⚫ |
* Sorry, I'm not sure what this means. ] 11:57, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Thomas Partey == |
|
Mind if i ask for a single clarification? ] (]) 21:23, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
* {{u|Trade}} No problem, although I will be logging off shortly (it is 11pm here). ] 22:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*:I'm fairly certain that one of the policies listed in the discussion states that discussions about banner pages should take place on the Wikiproject talk page. But your comment says that it needs to be taken up on the article talk page instead ] (]) 22:06, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
*:: Yes, in this case, because the dispute isn't really a Wikiproject one; the issue is whether the banner is relevant and/or suitable for ''this page''. The WikiProject page would be suitable for more general discussions on banner placement. Or alternatively the 2010 RfC could be revisited, especially as I think it's somewhat out of date now (we are much tighter on BLP than we were then). ] 22:09, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
Hi, I noticed your close as well. I have no issues with it apart from a factual inaccuracy that you added . There '''was''' a discussion before the ANI thread, see ]. ] ] 22:47, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
| ⚫ |
* Yes, I missed that because it was so far up the page. I'll fix that. ] 22:57, 3 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can you have a look at the antics at ] please? The short story is that the police have been investigating allegations made about a Premier League player and a file has been passed to the CPS but neither have named the individual (and they can’t due to privacy rules regarding the identification of suspects) meaning any sources naming anyone are conjecture. We have a young editor persisting adding the accusations to the article and talk page who will not stop. They have a CTOP notification. — ] (]) 21:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
== Some chips == |
|
|
|
* {{u|Malcolmxl5}} Indefinitely blocked and every edit revision deleted. I've also semi-protected the article. Thanks, ] 21:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*:Thanks. — ] (]) 21:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
{{chips}} |
|
|
No problem with you collapsing my comment- but consistency is good. That whole thread is a buffet of ] violations (random off-topic comments, jokes, venting etc.) so the correct course of action might have been to collapse it all, or collapse a lot more. No trout, but some chips (I like chips). Cheers ] (]) 20:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
* Fair enough, I was just trying to get it down to the basic issues. After all, if we could say "X newspaper occasionally prints stuff that is rubbish" we could probably expand that to nearly every newspaper in the UK. ] 22:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== AN3 decision == |
|
|
|
|
|
I've had a handful of thanks since posting . I'm thinking of asking at AN if what you said has consensus support amongst admins. Not to seek any sort of sanction against you or DrKay (I've never had any reason to think you're not a good/effective admin) but just to clarify if what you said is indeed an unwritten rule applied by the admin corps - if it is I'm surprised but I'd like to know. So before I do that I just want to check if you're absolutely sure of your position on that. ] (]) 20:33, 21 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Btw, what I said at AN3 was more combative than i should have been. Sorry about that. I was just a little shocked at the time to be honest. ] (]) 20:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:: No problem! I think it's just common sense more than anything else - you've got a drive-by editor inserting unsourced OR into an FA, and someone trying to keep it out. I can't ever see a situation in which they should be sanctioned for that. ] 20:37, 21 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
