Misplaced Pages

User talk:Black Kite: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:37, 25 September 2024 editBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,255 edits →RNIB: rp← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:45, 9 January 2025 edit undoMalcolmxl5 (talk | contribs)Administrators149,241 edits →Thomas Partey: Thanks.Tag: Reply 
(137 intermediate revisions by 46 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 30K |maxarchivesize = 30K
|counter = 95 |counter = 97
|minthreadsleft = 1 |minthreadsleft = 1
|algo = old(48h) |algo = old(48h)
Line 19: Line 19:
}} }}


== Block ==
== Request to re-open discussion at ] ==


Block with. All project ] (]) 11:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I see that you closed the discussion at ] regarding the ]. The user primarily arguing for the change has continued their arguments at ], including making right after the discussion was closed. I believe we may have more to discuss and was hoping you would re-open that conversation so that we can keep everything together in one place. ] (]) 04:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
* Sorry, I'm not sure what this means. ] 11:57, 4 January 2025 (UTC)


== RNIB == == Thomas Partey ==


Can you have a look at the antics at ] please? The short story is that the police have been investigating allegations made about a Premier League player and a file has been passed to the CPS but neither have named the individual (and they can’t due to privacy rules regarding the identification of suspects) meaning any sources naming anyone are conjecture. We have a young editor persisting adding the accusations to the article and talk page who will not stop. They have a CTOP notification. — ] (]) 21:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm finding your pblock of {{noping|GDX420}} all the more appropriate the more I engage with the ] article. Apart from content issues, it's striking that since mentioning "an allegation of “sexually abusive practice”", I find no more such allegation mentioned in our sources, including the Charity Commission's report, or in a brief online search, yet GDX420 repeatedly made such allegations in their edit summaries (e.g.,, – I'll not repeat them). Are such summaries candidates for revdel? Posting here rather than at ANI so as not to draw attention if they are. ] (]) 11:44, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
* I have rev-deleted the worst of them. ] 14:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC) * {{u|Malcolmxl5}} Indefinitely blocked and every edit revision deleted. I've also semi-protected the article. Thanks, ] 21:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
*:Thanks. — ] (]) 21:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:45, 9 January 2025



"And while I'm alive, I'll make tiny changes to earth." Frightened Rabbit


Black Kite
Hi, I'm an administrator here, and have been since 2007.  I'll try to answer any questions here as soon as I can, though I do have periods where I'm not available. For admins: if you think I've done something really f***ing stupid and I don't respond to a question about it, please feel free to reverse it ... we can work it out later on.


For Talk Page Archives, click here.


If you email me via Misplaced Pages, please leave me a note here (unless there's a good reason you do not want that fact to be public).  I do check my Misplaced Pages email fairly regularly, but not that regularly.


Block


Block with. All project 41.34.58.81 (talk) 11:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC)




Thomas Partey


Can you have a look at the antics at Thomas Partey please? The short story is that the police have been investigating allegations made about a Premier League player and a file has been passed to the CPS but neither have named the individual (and they can’t due to privacy rules regarding the identification of suspects) meaning any sources naming anyone are conjecture. We have a young editor persisting adding the accusations to the article and talk page who will not stop. They have a CTOP notification. — Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC)