Revision as of 18:37, 8 October 2024 editBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,255 edits →Protection: cm← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 21:45, 9 January 2025 edit undoMalcolmxl5 (talk | contribs)Administrators149,241 edits →Thomas Partey: Thanks.Tag: Reply |
(126 intermediate revisions by 41 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|maxarchivesize = 30K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 30K |
|
|counter = 95 |
|
|counter = 97 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 1 |
|
|algo = old(48h) |
|
|algo = old(48h) |
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Sock == |
|
== Block == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Block with. All project ] (]) 11:56, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
Hi, seems like an obvious sock of , pinging {{ping|ScottishFinnishRadish}}. - ] (]) 09:31, 5 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
⚫ |
* Sorry, I'm not sure what this means. ] 11:57, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Retraction and block == |
|
== Thomas Partey == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can you have a look at the antics at ] please? The short story is that the police have been investigating allegations made about a Premier League player and a file has been passed to the CPS but neither have named the individual (and they can’t due to privacy rules regarding the identification of suspects) meaning any sources naming anyone are conjecture. We have a young editor persisting adding the accusations to the article and talk page who will not stop. They have a CTOP notification. — ] (]) 21:33, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
Thank you for retracting the deletion. If possible, could you please block my account, as I no longer wish to contribute here? ] (]) 12:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
* {{u|Malcolmxl5}} Indefinitely blocked and every edit revision deleted. I've also semi-protected the article. Thanks, ] 21:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*:Thanks. — ] (]) 21:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
== Protection == |
|
|
|
|
|
I know that preemptive protection isn't a thing, but I'm wondering if the protection from ] should be copied over to it's ], as it seems likely to be a target for disruption. There was an edit earlier, and there isn't a good reason to be editing the redirect. -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 18:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
* Yes, done. In fact I've fully protected the redirect. ] 18:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC) |
|