Misplaced Pages

Draft:Law.asia: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:46, 10 July 2024 editDoubleGrazing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators125,555 edits Declining submission: web - Submission is about web content not yet shown to meet notability guidelines (AFCH)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:27, 10 January 2025 edit undoGraeme Bartlett (talk | contribs)Administrators249,810 editsm minor changes to avert g13 after refund 
Line 5: Line 5:
{{AfC topic|org}} {{AfC topic|org}}


An article from "Hong Kong 01" reports that the "Asia Business Law Journal" recently commented on the uncertainty of Hong Kong's legal environment. However, the Hong Kong Department of Justice responded, criticizing this view as ignoring the facts. The Department of Justice cited data from the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC), highlighting that the number of arbitration cases in Hong Kong is increasing and noting that Hong Kong ranks third among the world's most popular arbitration locations. Additionally, a spokesperson from the Department of Justice emphasized that after Hong Kong's return to China in 1997, it continued to maintain its judicial independence under the common law system, and under the "one country, two systems" framework, this system will continue in the long term. Furthermore, Hong Kong has reached several arrangements with the mainland concerning arbitration, which have further strengthened the legal mutual assistance framework and received national policy support, aiming to establish Hong Kong as an international legal and dispute resolution service center in the Asia-Pacific region. An article from "Hong Kong 01" reports that the "Asia Business Law Journal" recently commented on the uncertainty of Hong Kong's legal environment. However, the ] responded, criticizing this view as ignoring the facts. The Department of Justice cited data from the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC), highlighting that the number of arbitration cases in Hong Kong is increasing and noting that Hong Kong ranks third among the world's most popular arbitration locations. Additionally, a spokesperson from the Department of Justice emphasized that after Hong Kong's return to China in 1997, it continued to maintain its judicial independence under the common law system, and under the "one country, two systems" framework, this system will continue in the long term. Furthermore, Hong Kong has reached several arrangements with the mainland concerning arbitration, which have further strengthened the legal mutual assistance framework and received national policy support, aiming to establish Hong Kong as an international legal and dispute resolution service center in the Asia-Pacific region.


Based on the description of the official website of Asia Business Law Journal, Law.asia is the digital home of ''Asia Business Law Journal'', ''China Business Law Journal'' and ''India Business Law Journal.'' The website publishes Asia-focused legal news and rankings for in-house counsel and lawyers in private practice. It is produced by Law.asia Limited, an independent media company based in Hong Kong. Based on the description of the official website of Asia Business Law Journal, ] is the digital home of ''Asia Business Law Journal'', ''China Business Law Journal'' and ''India Business Law Journal.'' The website publishes Asia-focused legal news and rankings for in-house counsel and lawyers in private practice. It is produced by Law.asia Limited, an independent media company based in Hong Kong.


== References == == References ==

Latest revision as of 10:27, 10 January 2025

Submission declined on 10 July 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
  • If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
  • Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help
  • If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
  • If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
How to improve a draft

You can also browse Misplaced Pages:Featured articles and Misplaced Pages:Good articles to find examples of Misplaced Pages's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft Editor resources Declined by DoubleGrazing 6 months ago. Last edited by Graeme Bartlett 8 hours ago. Reviewer: Inform author.
ResubmitPlease note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.
A legal media

An article from "Hong Kong 01" reports that the "Asia Business Law Journal" recently commented on the uncertainty of Hong Kong's legal environment. However, the Hong Kong Department of Justice responded, criticizing this view as ignoring the facts. The Department of Justice cited data from the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC), highlighting that the number of arbitration cases in Hong Kong is increasing and noting that Hong Kong ranks third among the world's most popular arbitration locations. Additionally, a spokesperson from the Department of Justice emphasized that after Hong Kong's return to China in 1997, it continued to maintain its judicial independence under the common law system, and under the "one country, two systems" framework, this system will continue in the long term. Furthermore, Hong Kong has reached several arrangements with the mainland concerning arbitration, which have further strengthened the legal mutual assistance framework and received national policy support, aiming to establish Hong Kong as an international legal and dispute resolution service center in the Asia-Pacific region.

Based on the description of the official website of Asia Business Law Journal, Law.asia is the digital home of Asia Business Law Journal, China Business Law Journal and India Business Law Journal. The website publishes Asia-focused legal news and rankings for in-house counsel and lawyers in private practice. It is produced by Law.asia Limited, an independent media company based in Hong Kong.

References

>

  1. 劉夢婷 (2022-12-24). "《亞洲商業法律期刊》指香港法律環境存不確定 律政司批罔顧事實". 香港01 (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). Retrieved 2024-07-10.

>

  1. "Law.asia". Law.asia. 2024-07-10. Retrieved 2024-07-10.
Categories: