Revision as of 05:03, 17 December 2024 edit58.174.78.20 (talk) →Ariana Grande: new sectionTags: Reverted New topic← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 01:15, 11 January 2025 edit undoSNUGGUMS (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers121,363 edits fix |
(45 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) |
Line 70: |
Line 70: |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archive = Talk:Ariana Grande/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Ariana Grande/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|counter = 8 |
|
|counter = 9 |
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|algo = old(30d) |
|
|archive header = {{aan}} |
|
|archive header = {{aan}} |
Line 176: |
Line 176: |
|
::::File:Ariana Grande (Wicked Premiere in LA).jpg ] (]) 07:51, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
::::File:Ariana Grande (Wicked Premiere in LA).jpg ] (]) 07:51, 12 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:::::@] Add "She also has a large social media following, being the sixth-most-followed individual on Instagram" at the very end of the lead. Suits more. ] (]) 13:50, 16 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
:::::@] Add "She also has a large social media following, being the sixth-most-followed individual on Instagram" at the very end of the lead. Suits more. ] (]) 13:50, 16 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::@] Some change suggestions for the lead: |
|
|
::::::1. "Former contained the internationally successful singles "Problem", "Break Free" and the RIAA diamond-certified "Bang Bang", while latter became her fist of five consecutive number one albums in the UK", right after "My Everything" and "Dangerous Woman" mentions. Remove "Side to Side". |
|
|
::::::2. "Grande received critical praise for her potrayal as Glinda the Good in the fantasy musical film adaptation Wicked (2024), for which she earned a Golden Globe Award nomination." |
|
|
::::::3. Add "and one of the most RIAA-certified artists in history", right after "Grande has sold over 90 million records worldwide". |
|
|
::::::4. Add "She holds ]; seven of her number-ones singles and six of her studio albums each debuted atop on the ''Billboard'' Hot 100 and ], respectively", after Billboard mentions in the fourth section of the lead ] (]) 20:13, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::@] Is there a reason why you haven't added the two other? Also, its written "Glinda the Good" in most articles. |
|
|
:::::::Can you please change the lead photo to a more recent one. Even its nominated for deletion, its still the most recent one and should be used. |
|
|
:::::::Most particularly: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/91/Ariana_Grande_%28Wicked_Premiere_in_Sydney%29_2.jpg ] (]) 16:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::Yes, its written "Glinda the Good". |
|
|
::::::::What is the point of adding the ''Billboard'' chart records part? 6 number-one US albums and most number-one debuts is already mentioned. Whichever singles hit number one on the Hot 100 are explicitly mentioned in the lead too. |
|
|
::::::::There's various records that she holds or broke/set in the past, that are mentioned in the Awards and Recognition section. It is pretty redundant to just add that sentence and supplement it with the number of albums and singles that debuted at the summit. Artists like Beyoncé and Taylor Swift also hold various records, albeit not mentioned as a statement in their leads. |
|
|
::::::::What is the point of the consecutive UK number one albums? |
|
|
::::::::] (]) 20:34, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::@] Grande has seven number one debuts. This isn't mentioned in the lead. It just says, she broke the record of number one debuts. You're right with the other ones, I guess. ] (]) 21:04, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::@] Place the "sixth greatest pop star of 2024" mention, in "Music records and awards", in the the third section, as it's about a specific year, and not about Grande's overall impact. ] (]) 12:13, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::@] Maybe change to "is among the fifth-highest-RIAA-certified female artists, in the lead. ] (]) 18:42, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::::@] Your recent edit was kinda unnecessary. She still received those nominations. Critic Choice Awards is still pending. And she's most likely to be nominated for SAG, BAFTA, and the Oscars. Also replacing the link with the winners wasn't necessary, when the whole point is Grande receiving a nomination. ] (]) 23:01, 6 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::::Critics Choice Awards is still there in the 2024 subsection, along with its source, just as before, though. The article about the winners lists the nominees and highlights the winner (of each category) in bold. The reason behind replacing the reference was that either way, both state Grande as a nominee. Only using the previous source might make it seem vague as to if she won it or not, while the new source confirms the outcome. |
|
|
:::::::::::::] (]) 03:30, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
:@] "Thank U, Next" was named the 61st greatest album of the 21st century so far by Rolling Stone. |
|
|
:https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-lists/best-albums-21st-century-1235177256/ariana-grande-thank-u-next-6-1235185233/ ] (]) 19:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Re-etablish "Impact" section == |
|
== Re-instate Impact section part two == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hello guys, I don't know why Ariana's Impact section was deleted and why its content was moved to the "awards and recognition" section, but I demand that the Impact section be restored, because it is obvious that Ariana already has her place within the music industry and her impact on pop culture is undeniable, so please, I call the motion to restore what was already there, please. ] (]) 12:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
Hi guys, so it's been a while but it's unfair that Ariana Grande's impact section was removed, i don't know what happened, I would re-instate but i can't do it so someone has to, because Ariana definitely has impacted the industry, last article revisions corrobored it, in fact, I helped to make it, so please, cand somebody re-instate impact section? ] (]) 23:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:@] |
|
:Agreed. The change was pointless. Can you fix this? @] Grande has made enough of an impact in the industry that she deserves her own "Impact" section and the "Achievements" section is long enough already. |
|
|
|
:I think, it would be great to re-establish the impact section soon again |
|
:Grande will most likely be placed in the top ten of the "Billboard’s Greatest Pop Stars of the 21st Century" this month. So, let's wait until then, so the section can be updated, with more content. ] (]) 20:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:Sources you can look at (Choose the ones, you think are right): |
|
::@] |
|
|
|
:https://www.udiscovermusic.com/stories/ariana-grande-redefined-pop-sweetener-thank-u/? |
|
::Oh thank u so much, please do everything to restore the Impact section. Personally i think it was unfair to remove it because Ariana certainly has impact on music industry and life overall. ] (]) 14:35, 11 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:https://www.hercampus.com/school/umkc/how-ariana-grande-made-impact-2018/ |
|
:::Hi guys, we talked about reestablishing Ariana's impact section, but it's been a month and there hasn't even been an attempt to do so, can you please make it happen? It is unfair that an artist of Ariana's level does not have it and other artists do. ] (]) 22:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:https://www.thehypemagazine.com/2024/07/why-ariana-grande-reigns-supreme-on-spotify-a-look-at-her-streaming-success/ |
|
:@] Again, can you fix this? Orginally there was a "Achievements" and "Impact" section both which are now "Awards and recognitions". Look it up and revert it. |
|
|
|
:https://www.vulture.com/2020/12/taylor-swift-evermore-folklore-surprise-explained.html |
|
:Edits: |
|
|
|
:https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/taylor-swifts-new-album-evermore-embraces-more-is-more-release-strategy-11607621727 |
|
:https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Ariana_Grande&diff=prev&oldid=1239434628 |
|
|
|
:https://www.her.ie/amp/celeb/ariana-grande-opens-up-about-the-impact-of-thank-u-next-one-year-on-487668 |
|
:https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Ariana_Grande&diff=prev&oldid=1239434825 ] (]) 14:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/music-industry-study-women-diversity-1330009/ |
|
::I'll look into it and revert it. I will just check and make sure that any new content added since the change, is not deleted. |
|
|
|
:https://www.popbuzz.com/music/artists/ariana-grande/features/thank-u-next-album-review/ |
|
::Reformatting later today. Thanks! |
|
|
|
:https://www.theguardian.com/music/2019/feb/07/thank-u-next-why-pop-stars-fell-out-of-love-with-albums-ariana-grande |
|
::] (]) 16:13, 14 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2018/08/ariana-grande-rocketed-to-the-top-sweetener-pete-davidson |
|
:::Great. Thanks! ] (]) 11:09, 15 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:https://www.vulture.com/2019/04/a-guide-to-ariana-grande-pop-stardom.html |
|
::::Hi there, so it's a perfect time to restore Impact section since the greatest pop stars 21st century article came out and we can add some of it. Thanks! |
|
|
|
:https://www.theverge.com/2019/9/6/20852568/streaming-revenue-growth-spotify-apple-music-industry-ariana-grande-drake-taylor-swift |
|
::::https://www.billboard.com/music/pop/ariana-grande-greatest-pop-stars-21st-century-1235804073/ ] (]) 20:04, 17 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/in-praise-of-ariana-grande |
|
:Great work! @] While you are it, can you finally re-establish the "Achievements" and "Impact" section? |
|
|
|
:https://www.revolt.tv/article/2018-11-05/97237/i-guess-ariana-grande-did-what-taylor-swift-couldnt |
|
:There are some good points from the new Billboard article, that showcases Grande's impact in pop music; |
|
|
|
:https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-features/ariana-grande-yes-and-eternal-sunshine-1234965716/ |
|
|
:https://www.billboard.com/music/pop/ariana-grande-thank-u-next-pop-star-8483363/ |
|
|
:https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2018/11/ariana-grande-youtube-series-dangerous-woman-diaries |
|
|
:https://www.elle.com/uk/life-and-culture/g30256467/best-pop-culture-moments-2010s-decade/ |
|
|
:https://archive.junkee.com/ariana-grande-positions-era/275792 |
|
|
:https://dailytargum.com/article/2022/11/two-years-out-pandemic-era-hit-positions-reflects-our-growth?utm_source=twitter.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=Targum_Social |
|
|
:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/10/arts/music/popcast-ariana-grande-positions.html |
|
|
:https://www.teenvogue.com/story/filipino-youth-k-pop-ariana-grande-taylor-swift-advocacy-presidential-candidate-leni-robredo |
|
|
:https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-features/ariana-grande-god-is-this-woman-77 |
|
|
:https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-features/ariana-grande-yes-and-eternal-sunshine-1234965716/ |
|
|
:most recent one: |
|
|
:https://www.billboard.com/music/pop/ariana-grande-greatest-pop-stars-21st-century-1235804073/ |
|
|
:I feel like three good stuctured sections would be sufficient. Maybe get some help from the others editors who are in here regularly. There is already section above music records and awards, to start with. ] (]) 19:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
::@] You have not replied. Like I said, I would like to get this done this month. It's really not a big deal. Three sections of Ariana Grande's impact in the pop industry. I can help you too. Are the sources helpful to you? ] (]) 23:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Some of these are solid sources. But I'd not be able to start working on it this month itself. |
|
|
:::] (]) 03:32, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
::::That's okay. I will try to put something together, you can see, if you can added. @] |
|
|
::::Maybe some editors who are often working on this article, could help too? @] @] @] @] ] (]) 19:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
{{outdent}} I'll assess these more closely later, but from a glance, that is quite a large collection of sources you've given! ] (] / ]) 20:18, 10 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
:'''UPDATE''': I think it would be best to use , , , and among the links listed. Not sure how many paragraphs one could make using those. Regardless, more citations could easily be added to expand the section once started. ] (] / ]) 01:14, 11 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Grammar == |
|
:Her influence on newer pop artists; |
|
|
:"Trace that ring from start to finish, and you’ll witness something fascinating; a young woman who managed not only to transform her pain into prosperity, but created a mold-breaking model for success. The career framework Grande built has only benefitted recent pop ingénues like Sabrina Carpenter and Tate McRae, who’ve capitalized on her streaming-focused strategies and sweetly melodic (and slyly winking) pop&B sound to rocket-launch their own music. Ariana Grande consciously changed how pop music is perceived and enjoyed by the masses, in a way a new generation of fans and artists will forever be so f–king grateful for." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A line mentions that a nutritionist working with Grande has “got her to . . .” |
|
:Billboard stating that Grande’s “thank u, next” is an album that reshaped the entire music streaming industry; |
|
|
:"Where Adele had revit album sales in 2010, Grande became proof of concept at how the streaming era could generate gargantuan pop idols in the modern music business. Curating the social media experience for her army of Arianators over the course of her career paid dividends in Grande’s modern eras, as her loyal fan base rallied to support their fave at all costs, even as they occasionally crossed the line with comments about her image and personal life. She learned from the prolificacy of her hip-hop contemporaries like Drake that more was more when it came to content creation. Putting those two skills together, Grande became the artist to beat in the streaming game. " ] (]) 12:56, 19 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Would the Impact section be well sized enough to split though? |
|
|
::And I believe much of that will be converted into prose, to avoid too many quotes. |
|
|
::] (]) 17:21, 19 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Probably, if we add the Billboard article. I have some similar articles/sources about Grande's impact, I can later post in here. It should be similar to the likes of ], ], ] or ]'s Impact/Legacy sections. We definitely could get it to 3-4 sections. |
|
|
:::I know this needs some time, and is not as easy, because of phrasing and adding sources, so please don't rush. I just want to make sure, you have it on your radar. ] (]) 19:33, 19 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Sounds perfect. |
|
|
::::Yes, it will take time, but will be done gradually. (Some) content about honors by publications and artists inspired/influenced is there already. |
|
|
::::The excerpts you shared from the Billboard article will be added eventually. |
|
|
::::] (]) 19:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Hi everybody. So since the Christina Aguilera's interview from Rolling Stone came out she said this about Ariana and her production skills: “i’m not the girl who sits behind a line board visually & does my own. i’m like, God bless, Ariana, i’m not that girl”. If you can add this on Impact section would be amazing, something similar what Katy Perry said. Thank you so much for your labor. |
|
|
::https://youtube/jGwkU0DC8ec?si=kVxD6HWxRvryH3FL ] (]) 10:42, 22 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grammatically, this should be “gotten her to . . .” or the sentence should be rewritten to say something like “encouraged her to . . .” ] (]) 05:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Spotify metrics in lead == |
|
|
|
:Done... - ] (]) 17:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Technically, "has got" is considered correct in British English. See https://oneminuteenglish.org/have-got-vs-have-gotten/ ] (]) 03:54, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Is there a suggested rephrasing that works well in both British and American English? ] (]) 06:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
::Considering that the article is written about an American, in American English, the British English argument holds no weight. Also, the source says "gotten". - ] (]) 15:32, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 December 2024 == |
|
Per ], her statistics being the most streamed person on Spotify etc cannot be in the lead as it goes against Misplaced Pages's content guidelines that charts pertaining to one retailer/music provider should not be used. Ergo, this is the same reason why iTunes or Amazon Music charts are not used in Misplaced Pages articles. ] (]) 14:43, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The 98 billion info should still be re-added. It's important, as it as its describes her as the most streamed artist in general, and there is no mention of Spotify or other provider in it. ] (]) 18:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::@] Please re-add the 98 billion data. Thanks. ] (]) 19:01, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Upon reviewing ], {{u|PHShanghai}}'s edit was indeed consistent with that guideline (BADCHART and ] apply to prose as well as discography charts). Unless there is a compelling reason (and consensus) to bypass a Misplaced Pages content guideline (and I don't see either here), this shouldn't be readded. ] (]) 19:16, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::In what way goes this sentence: "With over 98 billion streams globally, she is the most-streamed female act as of 2021", aginst the guideline? It's described without naming any provider like Amazon/Spotify specifically. Isn't it the reason why it was removed in the first place? @] ] (]) 20:00, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::I don't think the guideline's intention is that a single retailer chart is ok to use, just as long as you don't say ''which'' chart. That would be even worse. I think the problem is not with including a count of Spotify streams, but in the use of a Spotify chart that ranks that count against others. That's a fair point. While Spotify is a major player in streaming, it is only one platform. Its counts are not necessarily representative of streaming activity across the entire internet. Which is a bias the guideline is about avoiding. I assume the 98 billion figure is across all platforms? Where does it come from, is it sourced?--] <sup>]</sup> 21:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Yeah, those numbers are in general. It's sourced by two reliable sources. I would agree to remove the Spotify numbers, they are still in her Achievements section anyway. However, her having 98 billion streams across all streaming platforms, is a rare achievement and one of her biggest accomplishments, which should stay in the lead. Especially as it not says Spotify or any other platform specifically. @] ] (]) 22:11, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::{{ec}} I think I misunderstood Mirrored's proposal. It looks like the 98 billion figure is sourced in the article body to , which reads in part, {{tq|By age 28, she released six albums which have all gone platinum and has surpassed 98 billion streams globally – she's Spotify’s most streamed female artist of the past decade – while rapidly becoming one of the biggest pop stars of our generation with her powerhouse vocals and unmatched presence both on stage and with her fans.}} It's not clear whether the 98 billion streams is a Spotify-only figure, but Spotify is mentioned in the same sentence. |
|
|
::::::The article also doesn't say anything about being "the most streamed female act ." That's from a second source, , which says {{tq|Grande recently surpassed 90 billion streams consumed worldwide, the most ever by a female artist}}. |
|
|
::::::The way the sentence is proposed to be written, it reads like ] since there's no source that directly references both the 98 billion streams and the "most-streamed female act" part. Given the Synth issue and the fact that the two sources cite different figures, I would propose simply leaving out the figure altogether and just say that, as of 2021, she was the most-streamed female artist worldwide. ] (]) 22:14, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::First source was from April 2021, which stated that she recently surpassed 90 billion consumed streams, the most by ANY female artist. The second was from months later, November 2021, stating 98 billion. I would trust the later more, as it's the most recent. She only recently surpassed 50 billion streams on Spotify, so I doubt this comes from the platform only, especially in 2021. Those numbers are mostly from Spotify, Apple Music and YouTube. |
|
|
:::::::Just re-add the senetence with the 98 billion data as it was. There's nothing wrong with that, it's all sourced and doesn't go against guidelines. ] (]) 22:44, 15 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::Unless you provide a source that explicitly states: "'''Grande has surpassed 98 billion streams across multiple streaming platforms including Spotify, Apple Music and YouTube'''", I don't see why the data should be re-added to the lead when there's not enough sources to support it. |
|
|
::::::::Furthermore, why is this information lead-worthy and not on ] or the Achievements section instead? What does her high amount of streams contribute to the conversation regarding her commercial success; which we can use other metrics for instead, like her amount of Billboard Hot 100 number ones? Why does the content need to be included? ] (]) 08:51, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::Why you need a source that explicitly states it. It's obvious why what is meant by that. Grande has been very successful in streaming, why not mention it in the lead? There are two major sources of the 98 billion streams info. So we should ignore her streaming accomplishments all together, just because you're not satisfied with it? ] (]) 09:26, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::Because every text in every Misplaced Pages article requires a clear and reliable source, per ]. Using two vague sources to conclude something is ]. I didn't say her streaming accomplishments should be ignored; I said that her streaming accomplishments should be sourced properly '''according to the guidelines.''' ] (]) 11:41, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::::They are sourced properly. It depends, on what mean with "properly". For me, the source has been very clear. And since the three years the source has been up, no one has ever complained about it either. ] (]) 13:10, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::I look up the sources again. It 98 billion is the most recent reported number. "The most by any female artist", which makes her the most streamed female artist, AT LEAST for that time, that's why, "as of 2021". Since then, there has been no higher figure reported for any other female artist. It has no provider listed, it has TWO reliable sources. ] (]) 20:46, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::Is it okay, to at least re-add "With over 98 billion streams globally, she is the most-streamed female act as of 2021" on the lead again. I don't think it's okay to ignore her streaming success in the lead, especially when she is primarily known for that. It has its sources and doesn't mention Spotify or other streaming platforms specifically. ] (]) 08:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:@] @] @] |
|
|
:Can you take part on the discussion again? |
|
|
:60 % of Grande's success has been in streaming. I don't think, it's right to ignore it all in the lead. I would be for it, to at least re-add the 98 billion streams part again, as it has no provider like Spotify or Apple Music linked to it. I also would be open to rephrase it differently. ] (]) 18:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::I find the 98 billion streams part to have weak sourcing and overall just reads ]. (Just because it is verifiable does not mean it needs to be included). Unless there is a '''broad, strong consensus''' that she is VERY NOTABLE for having very strong streaming numbers, it should not be readded. There are other artists like Drake who have amazing streaming records, but the numbers aren't mentioned in the lead. ] (]) 15:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Dance music == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{reply to|Ben0006}}, Hiya, was just wondering what sources are there for ES being a dance album? The article page lists "pop" and "R&B" as the two main genres. Personally, as someone who's listened to the album myself, the only true "dance" songs are "bye", "yes and?", and "we can't be friends". The rest of the album seems to be her usual R&B pop mix. When I think of a dance album, what usually comes to mind is something like Charli XCX's ] or Madonna's ]. Mostly it is the same genres as most of Ariana's albums, which isn't inherently a bad thing but not really a strong enough argument to call it a "dance" album. ] (]) 11:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:No one called it a dance album. It still has dance/house influences too. That's why, "ventured into dance music". ] (]) 13:06, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Sorry! That was a copy-paste mistake. Corrected! ] (]) 20:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 November 2024 == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit extended-protected|Ariana Grande|answered=yes}} |
|
{{edit extended-protected|Ariana Grande|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Add "Right after, she was ranked as Billboard's 6th greatest pop star of 2024" right after "In October 2024, Billboard ranked Grande as the ninth-greatest pop star, out of 25 artists, of the 21st century" in the 'Awards and recognition' section. ] (]) 17:28, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
Please use a better photo. This is from her lie detector video and makes her outfit look odd due to the machine apparatus. There are plenty of “Wicked” red carpet photos to choose from. ] (]) 15:26, 17 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Not done... please format your request as "change X to Y", with sources as needed. If there is a free image that you know of that we can use, please upload it or link it. We can't just use any image off the internet without concern for ownership. - ] (]) 15:40, 17 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
:Do you have a ] to cite? - ] (]) 17:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{done}}<!-- Template:EEp --> – ] 04:11, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Image == |
|
== Newest image == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{reply to|19Arham}}, the new picture that you changed to might potentially be copyvio, as there is no indication that "Our Movie Guide" was the one who actually filmed/interviewed Ariana at the Wicked premiere, and the description says "All materials provided by EPK.TV". ] (]) 14:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
@] The images haven't been deleted yet, so what's the point of not using either of them on this article? Especially if the Met Gala one is also nominated for deletion. The ones from the Wicked press are her most recent ones and they are also used for other articles of hers. ]'s lead one is also from the Wicked press tour. ] (]) 21:08, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:The image was changed under the reasoning that the prior image was being considered for deletion. However, it was replaced with a photo that is also under consideration for deletion, so the change solved one problem by creating another. |
|
:Okay, thank you for the clarification. ] (]) 15:12, 24 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:More importantly, the prior image was decided by consensus at a pretty well-attended RfC earlier this year, which shouldn't be overturned unilaterally. ] (]) 18:47, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::You're right. But now there are several recent pictures to choose from. The discussion only took place because there was no other current picture of her to choose from. The lead image right now, is not her most recent one. It's also not that flattering anyway, with all the butterflies in her face. @] ] (]) 18:57, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
:::@] Can you reply to me? There's no reason to not a have one of the most recent images of Grande as the lead photo. So far, you're the only one to have an issue with it. ] (]) 23:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Quality is more important than how recent a photo is. And ] is much better quality than ], in my opinion. Head shots are preferred for the lead photo, so the latter would need to be cropped, which will make its poor quality even more evident. |
|
|
::::Regardless, this discussion is not really worth having because both of these photos will likely be deleted soon. If anything, we should be discussing which other photo to use afterward. From a quick glance at Commons, all of the options from the past few years are low quality screenshots from YouTube videos, unfortunately. ]''']''' 23:30, 6 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::I agree completely with the points Prefall makes here. ] (]) 06:09, 7 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 November 2024 == |
|
== Edit request - typo == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed a missing letter in the 2013-2015 Career section: |
|
{{edit extended-protected|Ariana Grande|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Add a section for "Controversies." |
|
|
To include in this section: |
|
|
Grande has been accused of ]<ref>https://www.hercampus.com/school/columbia-barnard/ariana-grande-is-white-dont-let-her-make-us-forget-it/</ref><ref>https://www.vice.com/en/article/ariana-grandes-wax-figure-is-her-minus-pretending-to-be-black/</ref>. Grande is ethnically Italian-American, and commentators have remarked upon her skin color appearing to change dramatically, altering her hair color and hairstyles, and adopting different vernacular and slang, in manners that make her appear ethnically ambiguous. <ref>https://berkeleybside.com/thank-u-next-to-racial-identity-pop-star-ariana-grandes-record-of-racebending/</ref> Grande has been accused of "Blackfishing," in which "individuals often use makeup, ] and cosmetic surgery to change their natural appearance" to look Black when they are not racially or ethnically black.<ref>https://www.newsweek.com/ariana-grande-asianfishing-controversy-explained-1656807</ref> At the 2018 Billboard Women in Music Awards, Grande also stated to fans, "thank you so much for coming to my ]," despite not being Latino or Hispanic and never having a Quinceañera. <ref>https://www.billboard.com/music/awards/ariana-grande-woman-of-the-year-women-in-music-2018-speech-video-8489109/</ref>Grande has also more recently been accused of "Asianfishing" after sharing photos of herself "her makeup seemingly imitating Asian features."<ref>https://www.newsweek.com/ariana-grande-asianfishing-controversy-explained-1656807</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, please edit as you see fit. Thank you! ] (]) 10:43, 25 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Per ], which is admittedly an essay, not an official policy, "Controversies" is not a recommended section title. Rather the title should address the specific issue at hand (such as "Allegations of cultural appropriation.") if it is determined to be ] under the ] policy. ] (]) 19:01, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
{{talk-ref}} |
|
|
:{{not done for now}}:<!-- Template:EEp --> There are a number of issues with this request. First, there currently isn't a "controversies" section in this article (nor should there necessarily be one per PianoDan's comment). If there is another part of the article that you think this material would fit within, please let us know. |
|
|
:In addition, there are sourcing issues with this content. First, there are concerns about the reliability of Newsweek (see ]), and I'm honestly not comfortable supporting its use in a ] article. There is also no consensus on whether ] is a reliable source. The Billboard article supports the statement that Grande said, "thank you so much for coming to my Quinceañera" but doesn't mention anything about controversy coming from that statement. |
|
|
:I haven't assessed the other sources, but ideally this content should be discussed before it's added to the article. ] (]) 03:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC) ] (]) 03:02, 28 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
”became 2014's eight-best-selling digital single globally” |
|
== Re-instate Impact section == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grande used to have an impact section, however for some reason it was removed and merged into a different section. I see it has been said on here already that someone planned on reinstating it, but it hasn’t been done yet. Grande has had a massive impact, whereas ], who obviously has had impact but not to the scale of Grande’s, has an impact section on her page. I would appreciate it if the impact section is reinstated, especially now with the release of Wicked and with TIA :) ] (]) 13:05, 28 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:{{ping|Olivergrandeee}} Just ] and reinstate it yourself. You don't typically need to ask permission to add content unless someone else reverts you. ] (]) 18:01, 28 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
”eight” should be “eighth” ] (]) 21:44, 28 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Done... - ] (]) 02:12, 29 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Lead image == |
|
== Pronunciation of name (7 December 2024) == |
|
|
|
|
|
The phonetic pronunciation of her name is given as {{IPAc-en|ˌ|ɑr|i|ˈ|ɑː|n|ə|_|ˈ|ɡ|r|ɑː|n|d|ei|_|b|j|ʊ|ˈ|t|ɛ|ə|r|ə}} {{Respell|AR|ee|AH|nə|_|GRAHN|day|_|byuu|TAIR|ə}}. I think there are several problems here. Most importantly, the IPAC-en pronunciation does not match the Respell. {{IPAc-en|b|j|ʊ|ˈ|t|ɛ|ə|r|ə}} would be {{Respell|byuu|TAI|əRə}}, and I don't believe that extra schwa is needed. I haven't found a video of Grande pronouncing the last part of the name, but in this interview (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lo8HesXmO8&t=168s) the interviewer pronounces it without the glide after the initial B and with a more english EH vowel as opposed to the more Spanish pronunciation: {{Respell|buu|TER|ə}}. I would note that he Spanish pronunciation would not have the glide either. Lastly her normal pronunciation of her first name is more anglicized {{IPAc-en|ˌ|ɑr|e:|ˈ|ɑː|n|ə}} {{Respell|AR|ay|AH|nə}} with the close-mid front unrounded vowel rather than the close front unrounded vowel (https://en.wikipedia.org/Close_front_unrounded_vowel). This can be heard over and over here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Skglkez7QgI (Try 1/2 or 1/4 speed.) I cannot edit the article but I think someone should fix this. ] (]) 20:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Re-instate Impact section part two == |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi guys, so it's been a while but it's unfair that Ariana Grande's impact section was removed, i don't know what happened, I would re-instate but i can't do it so someone has to, because Ariana definitely has impacted the industry, last article revisions corrobored it, in fact, I helped to make it, so please, cand somebody re-instate impact section? ] (]) 23:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The lead image is ] under copyvio concerns. From ], Wikimedia commons administrator ] said "Vogue Taiwan republishing a copyrighted video doesn't make it magically CC-BY-3.0, when it has been demonstrated that the original is copyrighted. The license is obviously incorrect, and we would be hard pressed to refuse a takedown notice if Conde Nast were to decide they want to hold that copyright." I think the image should be removed due to the reasons I've mentioned, at least until the deletion discussion has come to a consensus. ]] 13:41, 30 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Ariana Grande == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:@] Most of her recent images are nominated for deletion, which is a bummer. We have to keep one of them as the lead image until they are deleted, because the other ones are a decade old and don't represent her that well. We've had many discussions about her lead image in here, just last year. ] (]) 18:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
Parents Ava Pava Edward Butera |
|
|
Siblings Frankie Grande ] (]) 05:03, 17 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
Hi guys, so it's been a while but it's unfair that Ariana Grande's impact section was removed, i don't know what happened, I would re-instate but i can't do it so someone has to, because Ariana definitely has impacted the industry, last article revisions corrobored it, in fact, I helped to make it, so please, cand somebody re-instate impact section? 2800:BF0:60:F22:B41A:3235:9050:2EBF (talk) 23:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
A line mentions that a nutritionist working with Grande has “got her to . . .”
Grammatically, this should be “gotten her to . . .” or the sentence should be rewritten to say something like “encouraged her to . . .” CERy1 (talk) 05:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Add "Right after, she was ranked as Billboard's 6th greatest pop star of 2024" right after "In October 2024, Billboard ranked Grande as the ninth-greatest pop star, out of 25 artists, of the 21st century" in the 'Awards and recognition' section. Elapiedra (talk) 17:28, 24 December 2024 (UTC)