| Revision as of 16:54, 3 October 2016 view sourceRagathy (talk | contribs)3 edits →SRI RAGATHY: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:03, 12 January 2025 view source Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,305,076 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Main Page/Archive 208) (botTag: ReplacedNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Short description|Wikimedia project page for Main Page discussion}} | |||
| <!-- | |||
| {{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed|{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}}}}<!-- | |||
| Please start |
Please start new discussions at the bottom of this talk page using the "NEW SECTION" tab, or use the "EDIT" link beside the section heading to add to it. The section edit link and "New section" tab are important, so please use them. | ||
| ⚫ | -->{{Talk:Main Page/HelpBox}} | ||
| {{#ifeq:{{PROTECTIONLEVEL:edit}}|autoconfirmed|{{pp-vandalism}}}} | |||
| -->{{Talk:Main Page/HelpBox}}{{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| {{Annual readership|title=the Main Page}} | |||
| {{Talk:Main Page/Archives}} | |||
| ⚫ | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |archiveheader = {{aan}} | |archiveheader = {{aan}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 200k | |maxarchivesize = 200k | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 208 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = |
|minthreadsleft = 1 | ||
| |algo = old(3d) | |algo = old(3d) | ||
| |archive = Talk:Main Page/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Talk:Main Page/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{MPH alert}} | |||
| ⚫ | {{Talk:Main Page/ |
||
| {{Centralized discussion}} | |||
| {{bots|deny=SineBot}} <!-- disable SineBot on this page to make reverts easier per discussion 20/02/2013 |
{{bots|deny=SineBot}} <!-- disable SineBot on this page to make reverts easier per discussion 20/02/2013 ] --> | ||
| ] | |||
| __TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| {{clear}} | |||
| =Main Page error reports= | = Main Page error reports = | ||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Main Page/Errors}} | {{Misplaced Pages:Main Page/Errors}} | ||
| <!-- --------------- | |||
| Please do not write anything here. | |||
| Please go to Misplaced Pages:Main Page/Errors to place an error report. | |||
| To discuss the contents of the Main Page, please start a new discussion using the "New section" button above, or use the "" link beside a heading to add to an existing section. | |||
| --------------- --> | |||
| =General discussion= | = General discussion = | ||
| {{Shortcut|T:MP|WT:MP}} | {{Shortcut|T:MP|WT:MP}} | ||
| <!-- --------------- | <!-- --------------- | ||
| Please |
Please *start* a new discussion at the bottom of this talk page (e.g. using the "New section" button above), or use the "" link beside a heading to add to an existing section. | ||
| ---------------- --> | |||
| == Jose Fernandez more important than Arnold Palmer? == | |||
| Absolute JOKE Jose Fernandez is on the front page and Arnold Palmer is not. Fernandez' death was tragic, but how many people knew about him outside of Miami other than hard-core MLB fans (which I am)? Say the name Arnold Palmer, and the vast majority of Americans and Canadians, not to mention many around the world, would instantly recognize what sport he played and what he accomplished, even though the last major he played was in 1994, and his last PGA Tour victory was in 1973 (two years before Tiger Woods was born). I would have no problem whatosever with Fernandez on the front page of the Spanish-language Misplaced Pages. But he shouldn't trump Arnie here. ] (]) 18:02, 28 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Regarding the first 2, I suspect a ] at work. That is, AP's mastery of the game was many years ago, so has been forgotten, while JF's major accomplishments are fresh in out minds. ] (]) 18:09, 28 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{ping|DavidSteinle}} It's not an importance issue. Per an RFC earlier this year, any person who dies and has an article is deemed notable enough to be posted to recent deaths. However, in the case of Arnold Palmer, the article is not up to par (forgive the pun) and has been the ]. If Palmer's article is improved (mainly referencing issues) within a week of his death, then it will be posted under the recent deaths section. {{ping|StuRat}} That might be part of the issue, but more than likely it's because Palmer's article is older and a bigger target for vandalism than Fernández's. Palmer's article was created on September 7, 2002, whereas Fernández's was created from a redirect on March 9, 2013. ~ ] (]) 18:23, 28 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Arnold Palmer hasn't been posted to the main page because his article is in atrocious condition. That's all.--] (]) 18:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Who is Arnold Palmer? ] (]) 09:15, 29 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::He has been added to recent deaths now. ] (]) 10:38, 29 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Pyst == | |||
| Someone obviously thinks this is a neat pun (though I believe "pissed" in that sense is purely an Americanism), but I don't think this really merits a mention. The Pyst article is not a great one, and relates to a 10-year-old video game. The Game Revolution page doesn't even mention Pyst, and the Pyst page only mentions it in passing. One review. Ten years ago. And does "pissed" on the front page really communicate the professional impression that Misplaced Pages is striving for? ] (]) 10:48, 30 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Couldn't agree more. Thought I was somehow on Uncyclopedia for a minute. --] (]) 15:16, 30 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::] is the best venue for this. ] (]) 18:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::However, the people involved in the selection of items for the main page and the language used there will tell you that Misplaced Pages is uncensored and that you should have been participating in the process sooner. Thou shalt not criticize the maintainers of the main page.--<span style="background:#C2C2C2">]]] </span> 18:50, 30 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::It's a bit of a push to suggest that the DYK project comprises "maintainers of the main page"... ] (]) 18:51, 30 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I thought it was a bit ] too, but the anon spoils his/her argument by making totally irrelevant points. Game is 10 years old- irrelevant. DYK is for new articles, not new stories, it is not In the News. Review is 10 years old- irrelevant. If notable then, is notable now. Not mentioned in Game Revolution- irrelevant. Review could be more notable for this article than that one. ] (]) 19:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Indeed, the main problem was the use of the word "pissed" in Misplaced Pages's voice (as opposed to a quotation), which was patently unacceptable and downright embarrassing. | |||
| :::::Astonishingly, ]'s original hook avoided this issue, despite containing similar wordplay (and required only minor tweaking). I'm baffled as to why it was replaced. | |||
| :::::I've switched to that hook, per the promoter's notation that it would be "the fall-back option" "if the no-fun police knocking". (Yeah, let's throw in an insult for good measure.) —] 19:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I've made a note of this at the DYK project. Nothing will come of it but it's important to record these failings, particularly if they fall outside the WP:ERRORS zone. ] (]) 21:19, 30 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| Misplaced Pages is quickly skydiving towards lack of credibility with postings such as these. ] (]) 22:58, 30 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::Not really, we could post dozens of these and we'd still be lightyears ahead of Google, Twitter, Yahoo and Facebook. No need to worry. --] (]) 01:29, 1 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :::None of the above pretend to be encyclopaedias. ] (]) 18:54, 1 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::::A 'what is becoming of the Misplaced Pages Main Page discussion' was about due :) | |||
| This probably applies to most encyclopedias. ] (]) 09:59, 2 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Current DYK image's license problem == | |||
| Currently, the DYK portion of the main page is using ]. Despite passing through ] and ] claiming during the review, the source website makes no mentioning that the image is licensed under CC-BY-4.0. We should pull the image off the main page as an interim measure until its copyright status is cleared up. (And I can't tag the file on Commons because it's currently protected). ]] 21:40, 2 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :There seems to be a CC license on the website's copyright page. Did you not notice, or is there a problem with its application? ] (]) 22:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == On this day... == | |||
| Today is the first day of the Jewish year. Worth mentioning, isn't it? ] (]) | |||
| :It was mentioned, on ]. The confusion is due to differences in calendars and timekeeping. Under the ] days begin at sunset. Under the ], which evolved from ], days begin at ]. To deal with the difference, Misplaced Pages is simply following the common practice of listing events on the Hebrew calendar on the date the begin under the Gregorian calendar. --'']'' <sup>]</sup> 10:41, 3 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ::But today will still be the first day of the Jewish year until sunset (although I'm not sure which sunset would apply for front page purposes - only where UTC is used?) I realise there may have to be an easy compromise to avoid having to set up special timers for such events. I'm guessing that "common practice" probably represents just such a compromise. ] (]) 11:15, 3 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :: Understandable, although there is a point to the comment above. Thanks. ] (]) | |||
| :::We used to list it on two dates: the Gregorian day that includes the beginning of the Jewish day, then the actual day itself, but it didn't seem particularly fair that Jewish holidays got to be listed twice due to a quirk in the calendar, whereas secular holidays and those of other religions only got to be shown once. I suppose I can take it up with the folks at ] to see which day they would prefer Jewish holidays to be shown on. <span style="font-family:Verdana; ">—''']''' <small>{]}</small></span> 16:01, 3 October 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == SRI RAGATHY == | |||
| hi , friends : | |||
| i am RAGUPATHY or SRI RAGATHY | |||
| naan konsam suya nalam kondavan. rommba matravangalukku podu nalam pesuven. | |||
| naan en vazhikkayil en ishdam pola 29 year 2016 vazhindu vandu ullen. en ennangal ellam mele irukku anal en thagudi low va irukku. | |||
| EDUCATIONAL DAILLS; | |||
| FIRST STANDARD to THREE STANDARD varai thirunilai village padithen. | |||
| FOUR STANDARD to FIVE STANDARD varai anindanallur village padithen. | |||
| FITTER course sri balaji i.t.i gummidipoondi padithen. ----- 2004 to 2006 | |||
| SIX STANDARD to TEN STANDARD varai vadagarai (redhills) chennai-52 padithen. -DRE-- 2004 | |||
| +1 STANDARD to +2 STANDARD varai arani village 601101 padithen. ---- 2008 to 2010 | |||
| B.COM DGREE SRI THEAGARAYA COLLAGE CHENNAI - 21 PADITHEN. ------ 2010 TO 2013 | |||
| M.B.A DGREE MADRAS UNIVERSITY (IDE) CHENNAI -5 padithen. ---------2014 to 2016 | |||
Revision as of 16:03, 12 January 2025
Wikimedia project page for Main Page discussion| ↓↓Skip header |
| Welcome! This page is for discussing the contents of the English Misplaced Pages's Main Page. For general questions unrelated to the Main Page, please visit the Teahouse or check the links below. To add content to an article, edit that article's page. Irrelevant posts on this page may be removed. Click here to report errors on the Main Page. If you have a question related to the Main Page, please search the talk page archives first to check if it has previously been addressed: For questions about using and contributing to the English Misplaced Pages:
|
 | Editing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled due to vandalism. See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account. |
| Archives: Sections of this page older than three days are automatically relocated to the newest archive. |
|---|
|
001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 021 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 036 037 038 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 056 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 074 075 076 077 078 079 080 081 082 083 084 085 086 087 088 089 090 091 092 093 094 095 096 097 098 099 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 |
Centralized discussion
- Refining the administrator elections process
- Blocks for promotional activity outside of mainspace
- Voluntary RfAs after resignation
Main Page error reports
Wikimedia project page for Main Page error reporting Shortcuts | National variations of the English language have been extensively discussed previously:
|
To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.
Main Page toolbox- Protected pages
- Commons media protection
- Associated
- It is currently 09:56 UTC.
- Purge the Main Page
- Purge this page
- Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
- Offer a correction if possible.
- References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
- Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 09:56 on 14 January 2025) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
- Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
- Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
- No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
- Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
- Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.
Errors in the summary of the featured article
Please do not remove this invisible timestamp. See WT:ERRORS and WP:SUBSCRIBE. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Today's FA
Tomorrow's FA
Day-after-tomorrow's FA
Errors with "In the news"
- The wildfires death toll has risen to 25. The main page currently says 24. ―Panamitsu (talk) 04:26, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Panamitsu: There's no need to request the updating of such numbers (the number 24 wasn't incorrect, only outdated, as it was absolutely correctwhen posted). Administrators will update them without these requests. In this case, the the update was done just over an hour after your request, although the admin who did it probably didn't see your comment here. Animal lover |666| 09:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Errors in "Did you know ..."
Current DYK
- ... that of the 156 Conestoga wagons (pictured) brought to the Braddock Expedition of the French and Indian War, only one remained intact by the campaign's end? That's not what the article seems to say. "Only a few wagons of the Braddock Expedition ultimately remained, and they were returned to their original owners when the vehicles arrived at Wills Creek in Pennsylvania." and "In total, 156 wagons are thought to have been employed for the disastrous Braddock Expedition, the only wagon to survive intact being that of William Douglas." meaning that only one wagon survives until now, but multiple survived the expedition (or else they couldn't have been sent back to their owners surely). Fram (talk) 09:06, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Also, surely it should be 'employed by' or 'taken on' the expedition 'during' the war, not 'brought to ... of'. Modest Genius 13:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- A rewording does not seem to be in the scope of Errors. The definition of "brought" is "take or go with (someone or something) to a place." which seems close enough to "taken on". SL93 (talk) 02:16, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging nominator PrimalMustelid. SL93 (talk) 18:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Also, surely it should be 'employed by' or 'taken on' the expedition 'during' the war, not 'brought to ... of'. Modest Genius 13:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, but that is not what the source says. It says (I quote):
- The number of Pennsylvania wagons that arrived back at Wills Creek has not been definitely established. For the service of their wagons, 30 owners received payment for a period greater than the 51 days, but of these, only 10 were paid for services beyond what appears to be July 20. Only the wagon of William Douglas, out of 146 wagons involved, seems to have survived the campaign intact. Inasmuch as the other owners were reimbursed for loss of their wagons, it is likely that those few that arrived back at Fort Cumberland were so badly damaged as to render them unserviceable, and therefore not worth driving back to eastern Pennsylvania.
- In short, the writer is talking about the situation at the end of the campaign, where only the one appears to have survived the campaign in serviceable condition, the others being too damaged to be worth retaining.
- Please note that I am about to log off so will not be able to respond further today. Gatoclass (talk) 18:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- So am I expected to emend the hook and/or article, or has the situation resolved itself? PrimalMustelid (talk) 18:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Can someone please pull or correct this? What's the purpose of this page? Fram (talk) 09:44, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Next DYK
Next-but-one DYK
Errors in "On this day"
Today's OTD
Tomorrow's OTD
Day-after-tomorrow's OTD
Errors in the summary of the featured list
Next Monday's FL
(January 20)
"45 men have served in 46 presidencies". That's true now, but that text will still display on inauguration day. The extra presidency refers to President Grover Cleveland, but Trump is about to enter the same status. So the number of men won't change, but the number of presidencies will. Despite Martin Luther King day, 46 will be wrong after noon Eastern Time or 1700 UTC, January 20. Art LaPella (talk) 07:22, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- If someone remembers, this can be amended in real time on the day... — Amakuru (talk) 07:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC)