Misplaced Pages

Machairodus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:00, 3 March 2024 editFunkMonk (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers102,770 edits Undid revision 1211692559 by Ryan Schwark (talk) That species has been moved to Amphimachairodus.Tag: Undo← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:52, 12 January 2025 edit undoHemiauchenia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users60,204 editsNo edit summaryTag: Visual edit 
(39 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Extinct genus of carnivores}} {{Short description|Extinct genus of saber-toothed cats}}
{{more citations needed|date=April 2013}} {{more citations needed|date=April 2013}}
{{Automatic taxobox {{Automatic taxobox
| fossil_range = {{fossilrange|Late Miocene}}
| fossil_range = {{Fossil range|16|0.12|] to ]|ref=<ref>{{Cite web|title=PBDB|url=https://paleobiodb.org/classic/checkTaxonInfo?taxon_no=41059&is_real_user=1|access-date=2021-07-04|website=paleobiodb.org}}</ref>}}
| image = Machairodus NNHM.jpg
| image = Machairodus aphanistus - Cerro de los Batallones - Museo Arqueológico Regional CAM.JPG
| image_caption = ''M. aphanistus'' skull | image_caption = Skeleton on display at the ]
| taxon = Machairodus | taxon = Machairodus
| authority = ], 1833 | authority = ], 1833
| type_species = {{extinct}}''Machairodus aphanistus'' | type_species = {{extinct}}''Machairodus aphanistus''
| type_species_authority = Kaup, 1832 | type_species_authority = Kaup, 1832
| subdivision_ranks = Species | subdivision_ranks = Other Species
| subdivision = | subdivision = *''M. alberdiae'' {{small|Ginsburg ''et al.'', 1981}}
*''M. alberdiae'' {{small|Ginsburg ''et al.'', 1981}}
*''M. aphanistus'' {{small|], 1832}}
*''M. laskerevi'' {{small|Sotnikova, 1992}}{{sfnp|Antón|2013}} *''M. laskerevi'' {{small|Sotnikova, 1992}}{{sfnp|Antón|2013}}
*''M. robinsoni'' {{small|Kurtén, 1975}} *''M. robinsoni'' {{small|Kurtén, 1975}}
*''M. horribilis'' {{small|Schlosser, 1903}} *''M. horribilis'' {{small|Schlosser, 1903}}
*''M. lahayishupup'' {{small|Orcut, 2021}} *''M. lahayishupup'' {{small|Orcut, 2021}}
| synonyms = | synonyms =
}} }}
'''''Machairodus''''' (from {{lang-el|μαχαίρα}} {{transliteration|el|machaíra}}, 'knife' and {{lang-el|ὀδούς}} {{transliteration|el|odoús}} 'tooth')<ref>{{cite book |last1=Roberts |first1=George |title=An etymological and explanatory dictionary of the terms and language of geology |date=1839 |publisher=Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, & Longmans |location=London |page=103 |url=https://archive.org/details/anetymologicala00robegoog |access-date=31 December 2021 |language=English}}</ref> is a genus of large ] or <nowiki>''</nowiki>saber-toothed cat<nowiki>''</nowiki> that lived in ], ] and ] during the ]. It is the animal from which the subfamily Machairodontinae gets its name and has since become a ] over the years as many genera of sabertooth cat have been and are still occasionally lumped into it. '''''Machairodus''''' (from {{langx|el|μαχαίρα}} {{transliteration|el|machaíra}}, 'knife' and {{langx|el|ὀδούς}} {{transliteration|el|odoús}} 'tooth')<ref>{{cite book |last1=Roberts |first1=George |title=An etymological and explanatory dictionary of the terms and language of geology |date=1839 |publisher=Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, & Longmans |location=London |page=103 |url=https://archive.org/details/anetymologicala00robegoog |access-date=31 December 2021 |language=English}}</ref> is a genus of large ] or <nowiki>''</nowiki>saber-toothed cat<nowiki>''</nowiki> that lived in ], ] and ] during the ]. It is the animal from which the subfamily Machairodontinae gets its name. Some species of the genus reached sizes comparable to a tiger, making them ]s of the ecosystems they inhabited. It is currently usually placed as one of the most primtive members of the tribe ], and the ancestor of later members of the tribe.


==History of research== ==History of research and taxonomy==
] from 1905 depicting ''Machairodus'' with ]-like markings. ]] ] from 1905 depicting ''Machairodus'' with ]-like markings. ]]
''Machairodus'' was first named in 1832, by German Naturalist ]. Though its remains had been known since 1824, it was believed by ] that the fossils had come from a species of bear, which he called ''Ursus cultridens'' (known today as '']'') based on composite sample of teeth from different countries, species and geologic ages, leading to what would become a long series of complications. Kaup however, recognized the teeth as those of felids and promptly reclassified the existing specimens as ''Machairodus'', including ''M. cultridens'' in it. The name quickly gained acceptance and by the end of the 19th century, many species of felid or related feliform (such as ]) were lumped into the genus ''Machairodus'', including but not limited to '']'', ''Megantereon'', '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']'' among others. This would eventually turn ''Machairodus'' into something of a wastebasket taxon, which would be rectified with the discoveries of more complete skeletons of other machairodonts.{{sfnp|Antón|2013|pp=118–119}} ''Machairodus'' was first named in 1832, by German Naturalist ]. Though its remains had been known since 1824, it was believed by ] that the fossils had come from a species of bear, which he called ''Ursus cultridens'' (known today as '']'') based on composite sample of teeth from different countries, species and geologic ages, leading to what would become a long series of complications. Kaup however, recognized the teeth as those of felids and promptly reclassified the existing specimens as ''Machairodus'', including ''M. cultridens'' in it. The name quickly gained acceptance and by the end of the 19th century, many species of felid or related feliform (such as ]) were lumped into the genus ''Machairodus'', including but not limited to '']'', ''Megantereon'', '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']'' among others. This would eventually turn ''Machairodus'' into something of a wastebasket taxon, which would be rectified with the discoveries of more complete skeletons of other machairodonts.{{sfnp|Antón|2013|pp=118–119}}
Line 28: Line 26:
*''Machairodus robinsoni'' was described in 1976.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kurtén |first=B. |date=1976 |title=Fossil Carnivora from the Late Tertiary of Bled Douarah and Cherichira, Tunisia |journal=Notes du Service Géologique de Tunisie |volume=42 |pages=177–214}}</ref> It was at one point referred to the genus '']''.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Beaumont |first=G. de |date=1978 |title=Notes complementaires sur quelques fe´lide´s (Carnivores) |journal=Archives des Sciences, Gene've |volume=31 |pages=219–27}}</ref> *''Machairodus robinsoni'' was described in 1976.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kurtén |first=B. |date=1976 |title=Fossil Carnivora from the Late Tertiary of Bled Douarah and Cherichira, Tunisia |journal=Notes du Service Géologique de Tunisie |volume=42 |pages=177–214}}</ref> It was at one point referred to the genus '']''.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Beaumont |first=G. de |date=1978 |title=Notes complementaires sur quelques fe´lide´s (Carnivores) |journal=Archives des Sciences, Gene've |volume=31 |pages=219–27}}</ref>
*''Machairodus laskarevi'' was described in 1978.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Lungu |first1=A. N. |date=1978 |title=The Hipparion fauna of the middle Sarmatian of Moldavia (carnivorous mammals) |language=Russian |journal=Izd. Shtiintsa, Kishinev |pages=132}}</ref> *''Machairodus laskarevi'' was described in 1978.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Lungu |first1=A. N. |date=1978 |title=The Hipparion fauna of the middle Sarmatian of Moldavia (carnivorous mammals) |language=Russian |journal=Izd. Shtiintsa, Kishinev |pages=132}}</ref>
*''Machairodus alberdiae'' was first described in 1981,<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Ginsburg |first1=L. |last2=Morales |first2=J. |last3=Soria |first3=D. |date=1981 |title=Nuevos datos sobre los carnívoros de los Valles de Fuentidueña (Segovia) |journal=Estud Geol |volume=37 |pages=383–415 |language=Spanish}}</ref> and extensively compared and retained as valid in 2019.<ref>{{Cite journal|doi=10.1080/08912963.2017.1402894 |title=Palaeoecological implications of the sympatric distribution of two species of ''Machairodus'' (Felidae, Machairodontinae, Homotherini) in the Late Miocene of los Valles de Fuentidueña (Segovia, Spain) |date=2019 |last1=Fernández-Monescillo |first1=Marcos |last2=Antón |first2=Mauricio |last3=Salesa |first3=Manuel J. |journal=Historical Biology |volume=31 |issue=7 |pages=903–913 |s2cid=135103217 }}</ref> *''Machairodus alberdiae'' was first described in 1981,<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Ginsburg |first1=L. |last2=Morales |first2=J. |last3=Soria |first3=D. |date=1981 |title=Nuevos datos sobre los carnívoros de los Valles de Fuentidueña (Segovia) |journal=Estud Geol |volume=37 |pages=383–415 |language=Spanish}}</ref> and extensively compared and retained as valid in 2019.<ref>{{Cite journal|doi=10.1080/08912963.2017.1402894 |title=Palaeoecological implications of the sympatric distribution of two species of ''Machairodus'' (Felidae, Machairodontinae, Homotherini) in the Late Miocene of los Valles de Fuentidueña (Segovia, Spain) |date=2019 |last1=Fernández-Monescillo |first1=Marcos |last2=Antón |first2=Mauricio |last3=Salesa |first3=Manuel J. |journal=Historical Biology |volume=31 |issue=7 |pages=903–913 |bibcode=2019HBio...31..903F |s2cid=135103217 |hdl=11336/57309 |hdl-access=free }}</ref>
*''Machairodus kurteni'' was described in 1991.<ref>{{Cite journal|jstor=23735460 |title=A new species of Machairodus from the late Miocene Kalmakpai locality in eastern Kazakhstan (USSR) |last1=Sotnikova |first1=M. V. |journal=Annales Zoologici Fennici |date=1991 |volume=28 |issue=3/4 |pages=361–369 }}</ref> It was later referred to the genus ''Amphimachairodus''. *''Machairodus kurteni'' was described in 1991.<ref>{{Cite journal|jstor=23735460 |title=A new species of Machairodus from the late Miocene Kalmakpai locality in eastern Kazakhstan (USSR) |last1=Sotnikova |first1=M. V. |journal=Annales Zoologici Fennici |date=1991 |volume=28 |issue=3/4 |pages=361–369 }}</ref> It was later referred to the genus ''Amphimachairodus''.
Some of the most important fossils of ''Machairodus'' have come from the ] fossil site in Spain, which are filled caverns which predominantly carnivores became trapped within after entering probably looking for food or water, with the remains of the species ''Machairodus aphanistus'' representing roughtly 1/4 of all bones found at the Batallones-1 cavern at the site.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Domingo |first1=M. Soledad |last2=Alberdi |first2=M. Teresa |last3=Azanza |first3=Beatriz |last4=Silva |first4=Pablo G. |last5=Morales |first5=Jorge |date=2013-05-01 |editor-last=Farke |editor-first=Andrew A. |title=Origin of an Assemblage Massively Dominated by Carnivorans from the Miocene of Spain |journal=PLOS ONE |language=en |volume=8 |issue=5 |pages=e63046 |doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0063046 |doi-access=free |issn=1932-6203 |pmc=3641116 |pmid=23650542|bibcode=2013PLoSO...863046D }}</ref>


The fossil species assigned to the genus ''Machairodus'' were divided by Turner into two grades of evolutionary development, with ''M. aphanistus'' and the North American "''Nimravides''" ''catacopis'' representing the more primitive grade and ''M. coloradensis'' and ''M. giganteus'' representing the more derived grade.<ref name="Turner">{{Cite book |last=Turner |first=Alan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=66mRJSxIAfoC |title=The Big Cats and Their Fossil Relatives |date=1997 |publisher=] |others=Illustrated by Mauricio Antón |isbn=978-0-231-10228-5 |pages=233}}</ref> The characteristics of the more advanced grade include a relative elongation of the forearm and a shortening of the lumbar region of the spine to resemble that in living pantherine cats.<ref name="Turner" /> Subsequently, the more derived forms were assigned a new genus, ''Amphimachairodus'', which includes ''M. coloradensis'', ''M. kurteni'', ''M. kabir'' and ''M. giganteus''.{{sfnp|Antón|2013}} In addition, ''M. catacopsis'' was reclassified as ''N. catacopsis''.<ref name="AntónSalesa2013">{{cite journal |last1=Antón |first1=Mauricio |last2=Salesa |first2=Manuel J. |last3=Siliceo |first3=Gema |year=2013 |title=Machairodont adaptations and affinities of the Holarctic late Miocene homotherin Machairodus(Mammalia, Carnivora, Felidae): the case of Machairodus catocopis Cope, 1887 |journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology |volume=33 |issue=5 |pages=1202–1213 |bibcode=2013JVPal..33.1202A |doi=10.1080/02724634.2013.760468 |issn=0272-4634 |s2cid=86067845 |hdl=10261/93630}}</ref>
==Description==
In general ''Machairodus'' was similar in size to a modern ] or ], at {{convert|2|m|ft|abbr=in}} long and standing about {{convert|1|m|ft|abbr=in}} at the shoulder.


Modern scholarship generally classifies ''Machairodus'' as one of the most primitive members of the tribe ] (with some authors retaining the name "Machairodontini" for the group<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Jiangzuo |first1=Qigao |last2=Werdelin |first2=Lars |last3=Sanisidro |first3=Oscar |last4=Yang |first4=Rong |last5=Fu |first5=Jiao |last6=Li |first6=Shijie |last7=Wang |first7=Shiqi |last8=Deng |first8=Tao |date=2023-04-26 |title=Origin of adaptations to open environments and social behaviour in sabretoothed cats from the northeastern border of the Tibetan Plateau |journal=Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences |language=en |volume=290 |issue=1997 |doi=10.1098/rspb.2023.0019 |issn=0962-8452 |pmc=10113030 |pmid=37072045}}</ref>).<ref name="AntónSalesa2013" /> ''Machairodus'' is thought to be a ] ] that is ancestral to ''Amphimachairodus'' (which is in turn ancestral to other homotheriines like ''Homotherium'').<ref name="jiangzuo etal 2022">{{Cite journal |last1=Jiangzuo |first1=Qigao |last2=Werdelin |first2=Lars |last3=Sun |first3=Yuanlin |date=May 2022 |title=A dwarf sabertooth cat (''Felidae'': ''Machairodontinae'') from Shanxi, China, and the phylogeny of the sabertooth tribe ''Machairodontini'' |journal=Quaternary Science Reviews |language=en |volume=284 |at=Article 107517 |bibcode=2022QSRv..28407517J |doi=10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107517}}</ref>
''M. aphanistus'' from the ] late ] is known to be rather tiger-like in size and skeletal proportions, with a mass of {{convert|100|kg|lb|abbr=in}} to {{convert|240|kg|lb|abbr=in}}. It was similar to the related '']'' of ]. The skeleton also indicates that this species would have possessed good jumping abilities.<ref>{{cite book |last=Turner|first=Alan|date=1997 |title=The Big Cats and their fossil relatives |url=https://archive.org/details/bigcatstheirfoss00turn|url-access=limited|pages= |publisher=Columbia University Press |isbn=9780231102292}}</ref>


==Description==
''M. alberdiae'' was contemporary with ''M. aphanistus'' in ] fossil deposits and was smaller and more primitive in anatomical features and would not have exceeded {{convert|100|kg|lb|abbr=in}}.<ref name="Fernandez-Monesillo2017">{{cite journal|last1=Fernandez-Monescillo |first1=Marcos|last2=Anton|first2=Mauricio|last3=Salesa|first3=Manuel.J|title= Alaeoecological implications of the sympatric distribution of two species ofMachairodus (Felidae, Machairodontinae, Homotherini) in the Late Miocene of Los Valles de Fuentidueña (Segovia, Spain)|journal=Historical Biology|volume=31|issue=7|year=2017 |pages=903–913 |doi=10.1080/08912963.2017.1402894|s2cid=135103217}}</ref>
]''M. aphanistus'' from the ] late ] was tiger-like in size<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Salesa |first1=Manuel J. |last2=Hernández |first2=Bárbara |last3=Marín |first3=Pilar |last4=Siliceo |first4=Gema |last5=Martínez |first5=Irene |last6=Antón |first6=Mauricio |last7=García-Real |first7=María Isabel |last8=Pastor |first8=Juan Francisco |last9=García-Fernández |first9=Rosa Ana |date=June 2024 |title=New insights on the ecology and behavior of Machairodus aphanistus (Carnivora, Felidae, Machairodontinae) through the paleopathological study of the fossil sample from the Late Miocene (Vallesian, MN 10) of Cerro de los Batallones (Torrejón de Velasco, Madrid, Spain) |journal=Journal of Mammalian Evolution |language=en |volume=31 |issue=2 |doi=10.1007/s10914-024-09721-8 |issn=1064-7554|doi-access=free }}</ref> and skeletal proportions, with a mass of {{convert|100|kg|lb|abbr=in}} to {{convert|240|kg|lb|abbr=in}}. It was similar to the related '']'' of ]. The skeleton also indicates that this species would have possessed good jumping abilities.<ref>{{cite book |last=Turner|first=Alan|date=1997 |title=The Big Cats and their fossil relatives |url=https://archive.org/details/bigcatstheirfoss00turn|url-access=limited|pages= |publisher=Columbia University Press |isbn=9780231102292}}</ref>


''M. alberdiae'' was contemporary with ''M. aphanistus'' in ] fossil deposits and was smaller and more primitive in anatomical features and would not have exceeded {{convert|100|kg|lb|abbr=in}}.<ref name="Fernandez-Monesillo2017">{{cite journal |last1=Fernandez-Monescillo |first1=Marcos |last2=Anton |first2=Mauricio |last3=Salesa |first3=Manuel.J |year=2017 |title=Alaeoecological implications of the sympatric distribution of two species of ''Machairodus'' (Felidae, Machairodontinae, Homotherini) in the Late Miocene of Los Valles de Fuentidueña (Segovia, Spain) |journal=Historical Biology |volume=31 |issue=7 |pages=903–913 |doi=10.1080/08912963.2017.1402894 |bibcode=2019HBio...31..903F |s2cid=135103217 |hdl-access=free |hdl=11336/57309}}</ref>
''M. horribilis'' of ] is the one of largest known species of the genus, weighing around {{convert|405|kg|lb|abbr=in}}. This is comparable in size to the much later '']''.<ref>{{cite book

''M. horribilis'' of ] is one of largest known species in the genus, weighing around {{convert|405|kg|lb|abbr=in}}. This is comparable in size to the much later '']''.<ref>{{cite book
| isbn = 9780128172773 | isbn = 9780128172773
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=xK2wDwAAQBAJ | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=xK2wDwAAQBAJ
Line 49: Line 50:
}}</ref> Its ], measuring upwards of {{convert|16|in|cm}} in length, is one of the largest known skulls for any machairodont, with only a recently described ''S. populator'' skull rivaling it in size, with the latter cat outweighing ''M. horribilis'' at {{Convert|960|lb|kg|abbr=on}}.<ref name="blogs.scientificamerican.com">{{cite web |title=The Biggest Saber Cat |first=Brian |last=Switek |date=November 3, 2016 |website=Scientific American |url=https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/laelaps/the-biggest-saber-cat/ |access-date=2019-05-22}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/14/science/saber-toothed-tiger.html?referringSource=articleShare|title=They Knew Saber-Toothed Tigers Were Big. Then They Found This Skull|newspaper=The New York Times|date=14 March 2020|last1=Sokol|first1=Joshua}}</ref> }}</ref> Its ], measuring upwards of {{convert|16|in|cm}} in length, is one of the largest known skulls for any machairodont, with only a recently described ''S. populator'' skull rivaling it in size, with the latter cat outweighing ''M. horribilis'' at {{Convert|960|lb|kg|abbr=on}}.<ref name="blogs.scientificamerican.com">{{cite web |title=The Biggest Saber Cat |first=Brian |last=Switek |date=November 3, 2016 |website=Scientific American |url=https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/laelaps/the-biggest-saber-cat/ |access-date=2019-05-22}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/14/science/saber-toothed-tiger.html?referringSource=articleShare|title=They Knew Saber-Toothed Tigers Were Big. Then They Found This Skull|newspaper=The New York Times|date=14 March 2020|last1=Sokol|first1=Joshua}}</ref>


The species ''M. lahayishupup'' of ] was also quite large; fossil humerus bones measuring {{Convert|18|in|cm|abbr=on}} attributed to the species suggest that this cat was far larger than a modern lion, which has a {{Convert|13|in|cm|abbr=on}} humerus. It is estimated to have weighed between 241 and 348&nbsp;kg, with a mean weight of 277&nbsp;kg; one particularly large specimen was estimated to weigh 410&nbsp;kg. Until its discovery, no true species representative of the genus ''Machairodus'' had been described from North America, as they had been reassigned to other genera, such as ''Nimravides'' and ''Amphimachairodus''. Its presence in North America suggests that either there was a widespread population of this genus of cat throughout Africa, Eurasia and North America or simultaneous instances of independent evolution in machairodonts on multiple continents during the Miocene.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://phys.org/news/2021-05-newly-saber-toothed-cat-largest-history.html|title = Newly identified saber-toothed cat is one of largest in history}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10914-021-09540-1|doi=10.1007/s10914-021-09540-1|title=Quantitative Analyses of Feliform Humeri Reveal the Existence of a Very Large Cat in North America During the Miocene|year=2021|last1=Orcutt|first1=John D.|last2=Calede|first2=Jonathan J.M.|journal=Journal of Mammalian Evolution|volume=28|issue=3|pages=729–751|s2cid=235541255}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sci.news/paleontology/machairodus-lahayishupup-09619.html|title=Giant Saber-Toothed Cat Roamed North America during Miocene &#124; Paleontology &#124; Sci-News.com|first=Enrico de|last=Lazaro|date=4 May 2021|website=Sci.News: Breaking Science News|accessdate=18 December 2022}}</ref> The species ''M. lahayishupup'' of ] was also quite large; fossil humerus bones measuring {{Convert|18|in|cm|abbr=on}} attributed to the species suggest that this cat was far larger than a modern lion, which has a {{Convert|13|in|cm|abbr=on}} humerus. It is estimated to have weighed between 241 and 348&nbsp;kg, with a mean weight of 277&nbsp;kg; one particularly large specimen was estimated to weigh 410&nbsp;kg. Until its discovery, no true species representative of the genus ''Machairodus'' had been described from North America, as they had been reassigned to other genera, such as ''Nimravides'' and ''Amphimachairodus''. Its presence in North America suggests that either there was a widespread population of this genus of cat throughout Africa, Eurasia and North America or simultaneous instances of independent evolution in machairodonts on multiple continents during the Miocene.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://phys.org/news/2021-05-newly-saber-toothed-cat-largest-history.html|title = Newly identified saber-toothed cat is one of largest in history}}</ref><ref name="link.springer.com">{{Cite journal|url=https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10914-021-09540-1|doi=10.1007/s10914-021-09540-1|title=Quantitative Analyses of Feliform Humeri Reveal the Existence of a Very Large Cat in North America During the Miocene|year=2021|last1=Orcutt|first1=John D.|last2=Calede|first2=Jonathan J.M.|journal=Journal of Mammalian Evolution|volume=28|issue=3|pages=729–751|s2cid=235541255}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.sci.news/paleontology/machairodus-lahayishupup-09619.html|title=Giant Saber-Toothed Cat Roamed North America during Miocene &#124; Paleontology &#124; Sci-News.com|first=Enrico |last=de Lazaro|date=4 May 2021|website=Sci.News: Breaking Science News|accessdate=18 December 2022}}</ref>


Overall, the skull of ''Machairodus'' was noticeably narrow compared with the skulls of ] ] ]s, and the orbits were relatively small. The canines were long, thin and flattened from side to side but broad from front to back like the blade of a knife, as in ''Homotherium''. The front and back edges of the canines were serrated when they first grew, but these serrations were worn down in the first few years of the animal's life. However, a skull of ''M. horribilis'' was shown to be similar to extant pantherines in some cranial characters, suggesting new evidence for the diversity of killing bites even in the largest saber-toothed carnivorans, offering an additional mechanism for the mosaic evolution leading to functional and morphological diversity in sabertooth cats.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Deng|first1=Tao|last2=Zhang|first2=Yun-Xiang|date=|title=A skull of Machairodus horribilis and new evidence for gigantism as a mode of mosaic evolution in machairodonts (Felidae, Carnivora)|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309409331|journal=Vertebrata PalAsiatica|volume=54|pages=302–318|via=ResearchGate}}</ref> Overall, the skull of ''Machairodus'' was noticeably narrow compared with the skulls of ] ] ]s, and the orbits were relatively small. The canines were long, thin and flattened from side to side but broad from front to back like the blade of a knife, as in ''Homotherium''. The front and back edges of the canines were serrated when they first grew, but these serrations were worn down in the first few years of the animal's life. However, a skull of ''M. horribilis'' was shown to be similar to extant pantherines in some cranial characters, suggesting new evidence for the diversity of killing bites even in the largest saber-toothed carnivorans, offering an additional mechanism for the mosaic evolution leading to functional and morphological diversity in sabertooth cats.<ref name="researchgate.net">{{Cite journal|last1=Deng|first1=Tao|last2=Zhang|first2=Yun-Xiang|date=|title=A skull of Machairodus horribilis and new evidence for gigantism as a mode of mosaic evolution in machairodonts (Felidae, Carnivora)|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309409331|journal=Vertebrata PalAsiatica|volume=54|pages=302–318|via=ResearchGate}}</ref>
]]]
''Machairodus'' probably hunted as an ambush predator. Its legs were too short to sustain a long chase, so it most likely was a good jumper, and used its canines to cut open the throat of its prey. Its teeth were rooted to its mouth and were as delicate as those in some related genera, unlike most saber-toothed cats and nimravids of the time, which often had extremely long canines which hung out of their mouths. The fangs of ''Machairodus'', however, were able to more easily fit in its mouth comfortably while being long and effective for hunting.<ref name = "Legendre">{{Cite journal |last=Legendre |first=S. |author2=Roth, C. |title=Correlation of carnassial tooth size and body weight in recent carnivores (Mammalia) |journal=Historical Biology |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=85–98 |year=1988 |doi=10.1080/08912968809386468 }}</ref> Despite its great size, the largest example of ''Machairodus'', ''M. horribilis'' was better equipped to hunt relatively smaller prey than ''Smilodon'', as evidenced by its moderate jaw gape of 70 degrees, similar to the gape of a modern lion.<ref name="blogs.scientificamerican.com"/>

==Classification==
]]]
The fossil species assigned to the genus ''Machairodus'' were divided by Turner into two grades of evolutionary development, with ''M. aphanistus'' and the North American "''Nimravides''" ''catacopis'' representing the more primitive grade and ''M. coloradensis'' and ''M. giganteus'' representing the more derived grade.<ref name = "Turner">{{Cite book
| last = Turner | first = Alan | others = Illustrated by Mauricio Antón
| title = The Big Cats and Their Fossil Relatives | publisher = ]
| date = 1997 | pages = 233
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=66mRJSxIAfoC
| isbn = 978-0-231-10228-5 }}</ref> The characteristics of the more advanced grade include a relative elongation of the forearm and a shortening of the lumbar region of the spine to resemble that in living pantherine cats.<ref name = "Turner"/> Subsequently, the more derived forms were assigned a new genus, ''Amphimachairodus'', which includes ''M. coloradensis'', ''M. kurteni'', ''M. kabir'' and ''M. giganteus''.{{sfnp|Antón|2013}} In addition, ''M. catacopsis'' was reclassified as ''N. catacopsis''.<ref name="AntónSalesa2013">{{cite journal |last1=Antón |first1=Mauricio |last2=Salesa |first2=Manuel J. |last3=Siliceo |first3=Gema |title=Machairodont adaptations and affinities of the Holarctic late Miocene homotherin Machairodus(Mammalia, Carnivora, Felidae): the case of Machairodus catocopis Cope, 1887 |journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology |volume=33 |issue=5 |year=2013 |pages=1202–1213 |issn=0272-4634 |doi=10.1080/02724634.2013.760468 |bibcode=2013JVPal..33.1202A |hdl=10261/93630|s2cid=86067845 }}</ref>


==Paleobiology== ==Paleobiology==
] ]

Studies of ''Machairodus'' indicate that the cat relied predominantly on its neck muscles to make the killing bite applied to its victims. The cervical vertebrae show clear adaptations to making vertical motions in the neck and skull. There are also clear adaptations for precise movements, strength, and flexibility in the neck that show compatibility with the canine-shearing bite technique that machairodontine cats are believed to have performed. These adaptations are believed to have also been partial compensation in this primitive machairodont against the high percentage of canine breakages seen in the genus.<ref>{{Cite journal|url=https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-abstract/188/1/319/5581941?redirectedFrom=fulltext|doi = 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz086|title = The early evolution of the sabre-toothed felid killing bite: The significance of the cervical morphology of Machairodus aphanistus (Carnivora: Felidae: Machairodontinae)|year = 2020|last1 = Antón|first1 = Mauricio|last2 = Siliceo|first2 = Gema|last3 = Pastor|first3 = Juan Francisco|last4 = Morales|first4 = Jorge|last5 = Salesa|first5 = Manuel J.|journal = Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society|volume = 188|pages = 319–342|doi-access = free}}</ref>
=== Predatory behavior ===
''Machairodus'' probably hunted as an ambush predator. Its legs were too short to sustain a long chase, so it most likely was a good jumper. Its teeth were rooted to its mouth and were as delicate as those in some related genera, unlike most saber-toothed cats and nimravids of the time, which often had extremely long canines which hung out of their mouths. The fangs of ''Machairodus'', however, were able to more easily fit in its mouth comfortably while being long and effective for hunting.<ref name = "Legendre">{{Cite journal |last=Legendre |first=S. |author2=Roth, C. |title=Correlation of carnassial tooth size and body weight in recent carnivores (Mammalia) |journal=Historical Biology |volume=1 |issue=1 |pages=85–98 |year=1988 |doi=10.1080/08912968809386468 |bibcode=1988HBio....1...85L }}</ref> Studies of ''Machairodus'' indicate that the cat relied predominantly on its neck muscles to make the killing bite applied to its victims. The cervical vertebrae show clear adaptations to making vertical motions in the neck and skull. There are also clear adaptations for precise movements, strength, and flexibility in the neck that show compatibility with the canine-shearing bite technique that machairodontine cats are believed to have performed. These adaptations are believed to have also been partial compensation in this primitive machairodont against the high percentage of canine breakages seen in the genus.<ref>{{Cite journal|url=https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-abstract/188/1/319/5581941?redirectedFrom=fulltext|doi = 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz086|title = The early evolution of the sabre-toothed felid killing bite: The significance of the cervical morphology of Machairodus aphanistus (Carnivora: Felidae: Machairodontinae)|year = 2020|last1 = Antón|first1 = Mauricio|last2 = Siliceo|first2 = Gema|last3 = Pastor|first3 = Juan Francisco|last4 = Morales|first4 = Jorge|last5 = Salesa|first5 = Manuel J.|journal = Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society|volume = 188|pages = 319–342|doi-access = free}}</ref>

Despite its great size, the largest example of ''Machairodus'', ''M. horribilis'' was better equipped to hunt relatively smaller prey than ''Smilodon'', as evidenced by its moderate jaw gape of 70 degrees, similar to the gape of a modern lion.<ref name="blogs.scientificamerican.com"/> While ''M. lahayishupup'' may have preferred prey that typically weigh 413-1,386.3&nbsp;kg with the maximum prey size being 1.6 tonnes, although it may not have been a large prey specialist.<ref name="link.springer.com"/>

=== Pathology ===
''Machairodus aphanistus'' fossils recovered from Batallones reveal a high percentage of tooth breakages, indicating that unlike later machairodonts, due to a lack of protruding incisors ''Machairodus'' often used its sabers to subdue prey in a manner similar to modern cats; this was a more risky strategy that virtually ensured that damage to their saber teeth often occurred.{{sfnp|Antón|2013|pp=183–184}} ''M. aphanistus'' fossils from Batallones displaying palaeopathologies also include a ] displaying evidence of either a ] or ], a third metacarpal displaying signs of ], and a mandible with an abscess in the mandibular body.<ref name="ReferenceA">{{Cite journal |last1=Salesa |first1=Manuel J. |last2=Hernández |first2=Bárbara |last3=Marín |first3=Pilar |last4=Siliceo |first4=Gema |last5=Martínez |first5=Irene |last6=Antón |first6=Mauricio |last7=García-Real |first7=María Isabel |last8=Pastor |first8=Juan Francisco |last9=García-Fernández |first9=Rosa Ana |date=31 May 2024 |title=New insights on the ecology and behavior of Machairodus aphanistus (Carnivora, Felidae, Machairodontinae) through the paleopathological study of the fossil sample from the Late Miocene (Vallesian, MN 10) of Cerro de los Batallones (Torrejón de Velasco, Madrid, Spain) |journal=] |language=en |volume=31 |issue=2 |doi=10.1007/s10914-024-09721-8 |issn=1064-7554 |doi-access=free }}</ref>

=== Social behavior ===
''M. aphanistus'' shows high degree of sexual dimorphism similar to lions and leopards, with males being larger than females, suggesting an increase form of competition between males.<ref>{{Cite journal |doi=10.1671/0272-4634(2004)0242.0.CO;2|issn=0272-4634 |date=2004 |volume=24 |page=957 |title=First known complete skulls of the scimitar-toothed cat ''Machairodus aphanistus'' (Felidae, Carnivora) from the Spanish late Miocene site of Batallones-1 |last1=Anton |first1=Mauricio |last2=Salesa |first2=Manuel J. |last3=Morales |first3=Jorge |last4=Turner |first4=Alan |journal=Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology |issue=4 }}</ref> Despite this, the species may have formed coalitions consisting of two to three males and defend large areas, including smaller territories of females, as several individuals have been known to severe injuries that would've otherwise killed solitary felids. However, it’s unknown if this would also apply to other species within the genus.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>


==Paleoecology== ==Paleoecology==
''Machairodus'' seemed to prefer open woodland habitat, as evidenced by finds at ], which is of ] age. As a top predator at Batallones, it would have hunted large herbivores of the time. Such herbivores would have included horses like '']'', the hornless rhinoceros '']'', the giraffes '']'' and '']'', the deer '']'' and ''Lucentia'', the antelopes ''Paleoreas'', '']'', '']'' and '']'', the “]” ] '']'', the porcupine '']'', and the suid '']''. ''Machairodus'' would have competed for such prey with the ] '']'', fellow machairodonts '']'' and '']'', bears such as '']'' and '']'', and the small ] '']''. While ''Agriotherium'' and ''Magericyon'' would likely have been strongly competitive with ''Machairodus'' for food, ''Promegantereon'', ''Paramachairodus'' and ''Protictitherium'' likely were less potential rivals.{{sfnp|Antón|2013|p=52}} Evidence also exists indicating that ''Machairodus'' may have been prone to ] with ''Magericyon'', possibly living in slightly different habitats, with the machairodont preferring more heavily vegetated habitats while the bear-dog hunted in the more open areas. Dietary preferences may also have played a role in the coexistence between these two large predators at Batallones.<ref>{{cite web |first=Brian |last=Switek |url=http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2012/11/30/carnivorous-neighbors-how-sabercats-and-a-bear-dog-managed-to-coexist/ |title=Carnivorous Neighbors — How Sabercats and a Bear Dog Managed to Coexist |date=November 30, 2012 |work=National Geographic |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130123184134/http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2012/11/30/carnivorous-neighbors-how-sabercats-and-a-bear-dog-managed-to-coexist/ |archive-date=2013-01-23 |access-date=2019-05-22}}</ref> ''Machairodus aphanistus'' seemed to prefer open woodland habitat, as evidenced by finds at ], which is of ] age. As a top predator at Batallones, it would have hunted large herbivores of the time. Large herbivores found at the Batallones site included horses like '']'' (consumpution of ''Hipparion'' by ''Machairodus aphanistus'' is strongly supported by isotopic analysis of remains from Batallones<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Domingo |first1=M. Soledad |last2=Domingo |first2=Laura |last3=Abella |first3=Juan |last4=Valenciano |first4=Alberto |last5=Badgley |first5=Catherine |last6=Morales |first6=Jorge |date=August 2016 |title=Feeding ecology and habitat preferences of top predators from two Miocene carnivore-rich assemblages |url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0094837315000500/type/journal_article |journal=Paleobiology |language=en |volume=42 |issue=3 |pages=489–507 |doi=10.1017/pab.2015.50 |bibcode=2016Pbio...42..489D |issn=0094-8373}}</ref>), the hornless rhinoceros '']'', the giraffes '']'' and '']'', the deer '']'' and ''Lucentia'', the antelopes ''Paleoreas'', '']'', '']'' and '']'', the “]” ] '']'', the porcupine '']'', and the suid '']''. ''Machairodus'' would have competed for such prey with the ] '']'', fellow machairodonts '']'' and '']'', bears such as '']'' and '']'', and the small ] '']''. While ''Agriotherium'' and ''Magericyon'' would likely have been strongly competitive with ''Machairodus'' for food, ''Promegantereon'', ''Paramachairodus'' and ''Protictitherium'' likely were less potential rivals.{{sfnp|Antón|2013|p=52}} Evidence also exists indicating that ''Machairodus'' may have been prone to ] with ''Magericyon'', possibly living in slightly different habitats, with the machairodont preferring more heavily vegetated habitats while the bear-dog hunted in the more open areas. Dietary preferences may also have played a role in the coexistence between these two large predators at Batallones.<ref>{{cite web |first=Brian |last=Switek |url=http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2012/11/30/carnivorous-neighbors-how-sabercats-and-a-bear-dog-managed-to-coexist/ |title=Carnivorous Neighbors — How Sabercats and a Bear Dog Managed to Coexist |date=November 30, 2012 |work=National Geographic |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130123184134/http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2012/11/30/carnivorous-neighbors-how-sabercats-and-a-bear-dog-managed-to-coexist/ |archive-date=2013-01-23 |access-date=2019-05-22}}</ref>


Based on its jaw gape, the largest species, ''M. horribilis'' was probably a hunter of relatively slow-moving horses of the genus '']''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Saber-Toothed Cat Had a Huge Skull, But a Puny Bite |first=Mindy |last=Weisberger |date=November 7, 2016 |website=Live Science |url=http://www.livescience.com/56775-sabertooth-cat-bite-diversity.html |access-date=2019-05-22}}</ref> It would have also lived alongside the large pig '']''. ''Machairodus horribilis'' lived in a multitude of paleoenvironments such as open woodland and open grassland. It shared its environment with forested mammals such as primates, chalicotheres, and the deer '']''. While in open grassland, it coexisted with '']'' and giraffids, although the latter was rare.<ref name="researchgate.net"/> This species of ''Machairodus'' was probably a hunter of ''Hipparion''.<ref>{{cite web |title=Saber-Toothed Cat Had a Huge Skull, But a Puny Bite |first=Mindy |last=Weisberger |date=November 7, 2016 |website=Live Science |url=http://www.livescience.com/56775-sabertooth-cat-bite-diversity.html |access-date=2019-05-22}}</ref> It would have also lived alongside the large pig '']''.
''M. lahayishupup'' would have most likely preyed on the large animals that it lived alongside, which included ], and '']''.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/31013/20210505/sabre-toothed-cat-from-9-million-years-ago-could-take-down-prey-ten-times-its-size.htm |title= Sabre-Toothed Cat From 9 Million Years Ago Could Take Down Prey 10 Times Its Size |author= Marie Morales |work= ] |date= May 5, 2021 |accessdate= May 9, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-identify-a-giant-saber-toothed-cat-that-prowled-the-us-5-9-million-years-ago |title= Newly Identified Species of Saber-Toothed Cat Was So Big It Hunted Rhinos in America |author= David Nield |work= ] |date= 8 May 2021 |accessdate= 9 May 2021}}</ref>


''M. lahayishupup'' is found is Hemphillian rocks from ], ], ], and Ogallala Formation.<ref name="link.springer.com"/> It coexisted with other Miocene animals such as '']'', '']'', and '']''. This species would've would have most likely preyed on the large animals that it lived alongside, which included ], and '']''.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.sciencetimes.com/articles/31013/20210505/sabre-toothed-cat-from-9-million-years-ago-could-take-down-prey-ten-times-its-size.htm |title= Sabre-Toothed Cat From 9 Million Years Ago Could Take Down Prey 10 Times Its Size |author= Marie Morales |work= ] |date= May 5, 2021 |accessdate= May 9, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-identify-a-giant-saber-toothed-cat-that-prowled-the-us-5-9-million-years-ago |title= Newly Identified Species of Saber-Toothed Cat Was So Big It Hunted Rhinos in America |author= David Nield |work= ] |date= 8 May 2021 |accessdate= 9 May 2021}}</ref>
==Pathology==
''Machairodus aphanistus'' fossils recovered from Batallones reveal a high percentage of tooth breakages, indicating that unlike later machairodonts, due to a lack of protruding incisors ''Machairodus'' often used its sabers to subdue prey in a manner similar to modern cats; this was a more risky strategy that virtually ensured that damage to their saber teeth often occurred.{{sfnp|Antón|2013|pp=183–184}}


==References== ==References==
Line 83: Line 82:
{{Machairodontinae}} {{Machairodontinae}}
{{Taxonbar|from1=Q1274400|from2=Q4043537|from3=Q122231736|from4=Q106708388|from5=Q107398024}} {{Taxonbar|from1=Q1274400|from2=Q4043537|from3=Q122231736|from4=Q106708388|from5=Q107398024}}

] ]
] ]

Latest revision as of 19:52, 12 January 2025

Extinct genus of saber-toothed cats
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Machairodus" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Machairodus
Temporal range: Late Miocene PreꞒ O S D C P T J K Pg N
Skeleton on display at the National Natural History Museum of China
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Carnivora
Suborder: Feliformia
Family: Felidae
Subfamily: Machairodontinae
Tribe: Homotherini
Genus: Machairodus
Kaup, 1833
Type species
Machairodus aphanistus
Kaup, 1832
Other Species
  • M. alberdiae Ginsburg et al., 1981
  • M. laskerevi Sotnikova, 1992
  • M. robinsoni Kurtén, 1975
  • M. horribilis Schlosser, 1903
  • M. lahayishupup Orcut, 2021

Machairodus (from Greek: μαχαίρα machaíra, 'knife' and Greek: ὀδούς odoús 'tooth') is a genus of large machairodont or ''saber-toothed cat'' that lived in Africa, Eurasia and North America during the late Miocene. It is the animal from which the subfamily Machairodontinae gets its name. Some species of the genus reached sizes comparable to a tiger, making them apex predators of the ecosystems they inhabited. It is currently usually placed as one of the most primtive members of the tribe Homotherini, and the ancestor of later members of the tribe.

History of research and taxonomy

Early restoration by Lancelot Speed from 1905 depicting Machairodus with tiger-like markings.

Machairodus was first named in 1832, by German Naturalist Johann Jakob Kaup. Though its remains had been known since 1824, it was believed by Georges Cuvier that the fossils had come from a species of bear, which he called Ursus cultridens (known today as Megantereon) based on composite sample of teeth from different countries, species and geologic ages, leading to what would become a long series of complications. Kaup however, recognized the teeth as those of felids and promptly reclassified the existing specimens as Machairodus, including M. cultridens in it. The name quickly gained acceptance and by the end of the 19th century, many species of felid or related feliform (such as nimravids) were lumped into the genus Machairodus, including but not limited to Sansanosmilus, Megantereon, Paramachairodus, Amphimachairodus, Nimravides, and Homotherium among others. This would eventually turn Machairodus into something of a wastebasket taxon, which would be rectified with the discoveries of more complete skeletons of other machairodonts.

  • Machairodus irtyschensis and Machairodus ischimicus were described in 1936.
  • Machairodus robinsoni was described in 1976. It was at one point referred to the genus Miomachairodus.
  • Machairodus laskarevi was described in 1978.
  • Machairodus alberdiae was first described in 1981, and extensively compared and retained as valid in 2019.
  • Machairodus kurteni was described in 1991. It was later referred to the genus Amphimachairodus.

Some of the most important fossils of Machairodus have come from the Cerro de los Batallones fossil site in Spain, which are filled caverns which predominantly carnivores became trapped within after entering probably looking for food or water, with the remains of the species Machairodus aphanistus representing roughtly 1/4 of all bones found at the Batallones-1 cavern at the site.

The fossil species assigned to the genus Machairodus were divided by Turner into two grades of evolutionary development, with M. aphanistus and the North American "Nimravides" catacopis representing the more primitive grade and M. coloradensis and M. giganteus representing the more derived grade. The characteristics of the more advanced grade include a relative elongation of the forearm and a shortening of the lumbar region of the spine to resemble that in living pantherine cats. Subsequently, the more derived forms were assigned a new genus, Amphimachairodus, which includes M. coloradensis, M. kurteni, M. kabir and M. giganteus. In addition, M. catacopsis was reclassified as N. catacopsis.

Modern scholarship generally classifies Machairodus as one of the most primitive members of the tribe Homotherini (with some authors retaining the name "Machairodontini" for the group). Machairodus is thought to be a paraphyletic evolutionary grade that is ancestral to Amphimachairodus (which is in turn ancestral to other homotheriines like Homotherium).

Description

M. aphanistus skull

M. aphanistus from the Mediterranean late Miocene was tiger-like in size and skeletal proportions, with a mass of 100 kg (220 pounds) to 240 kg (530 pounds). It was similar to the related Nimravides of North America. The skeleton also indicates that this species would have possessed good jumping abilities.

M. alberdiae was contemporary with M. aphanistus in Cerro de los Batallones fossil deposits and was smaller and more primitive in anatomical features and would not have exceeded 100 kg (220 pounds).

M. horribilis of China is one of largest known species in the genus, weighing around 405 kg (893 pounds). This is comparable in size to the much later Smilodon populator. Its skull, measuring upwards of 16 inches (41 cm) in length, is one of the largest known skulls for any machairodont, with only a recently described S. populator skull rivaling it in size, with the latter cat outweighing M. horribilis at 960 lb (440 kg).

The species M. lahayishupup of North America was also quite large; fossil humerus bones measuring 18 in (46 cm) attributed to the species suggest that this cat was far larger than a modern lion, which has a 13 in (33 cm) humerus. It is estimated to have weighed between 241 and 348 kg, with a mean weight of 277 kg; one particularly large specimen was estimated to weigh 410 kg. Until its discovery, no true species representative of the genus Machairodus had been described from North America, as they had been reassigned to other genera, such as Nimravides and Amphimachairodus. Its presence in North America suggests that either there was a widespread population of this genus of cat throughout Africa, Eurasia and North America or simultaneous instances of independent evolution in machairodonts on multiple continents during the Miocene.

Overall, the skull of Machairodus was noticeably narrow compared with the skulls of extant pantherine cats, and the orbits were relatively small. The canines were long, thin and flattened from side to side but broad from front to back like the blade of a knife, as in Homotherium. The front and back edges of the canines were serrated when they first grew, but these serrations were worn down in the first few years of the animal's life. However, a skull of M. horribilis was shown to be similar to extant pantherines in some cranial characters, suggesting new evidence for the diversity of killing bites even in the largest saber-toothed carnivorans, offering an additional mechanism for the mosaic evolution leading to functional and morphological diversity in sabertooth cats.

M. aphanistus skeleton from Cerro de los Batallones

Paleobiology

Restoration

Predatory behavior

Machairodus probably hunted as an ambush predator. Its legs were too short to sustain a long chase, so it most likely was a good jumper. Its teeth were rooted to its mouth and were as delicate as those in some related genera, unlike most saber-toothed cats and nimravids of the time, which often had extremely long canines which hung out of their mouths. The fangs of Machairodus, however, were able to more easily fit in its mouth comfortably while being long and effective for hunting. Studies of Machairodus indicate that the cat relied predominantly on its neck muscles to make the killing bite applied to its victims. The cervical vertebrae show clear adaptations to making vertical motions in the neck and skull. There are also clear adaptations for precise movements, strength, and flexibility in the neck that show compatibility with the canine-shearing bite technique that machairodontine cats are believed to have performed. These adaptations are believed to have also been partial compensation in this primitive machairodont against the high percentage of canine breakages seen in the genus.

Despite its great size, the largest example of Machairodus, M. horribilis was better equipped to hunt relatively smaller prey than Smilodon, as evidenced by its moderate jaw gape of 70 degrees, similar to the gape of a modern lion. While M. lahayishupup may have preferred prey that typically weigh 413-1,386.3 kg with the maximum prey size being 1.6 tonnes, although it may not have been a large prey specialist.

Pathology

Machairodus aphanistus fossils recovered from Batallones reveal a high percentage of tooth breakages, indicating that unlike later machairodonts, due to a lack of protruding incisors Machairodus often used its sabers to subdue prey in a manner similar to modern cats; this was a more risky strategy that virtually ensured that damage to their saber teeth often occurred. M. aphanistus fossils from Batallones displaying palaeopathologies also include a calcaneus displaying evidence of either a tumour or osteomyelitis, a third metacarpal displaying signs of osteosclerosis, and a mandible with an abscess in the mandibular body.

Social behavior

M. aphanistus shows high degree of sexual dimorphism similar to lions and leopards, with males being larger than females, suggesting an increase form of competition between males. Despite this, the species may have formed coalitions consisting of two to three males and defend large areas, including smaller territories of females, as several individuals have been known to severe injuries that would've otherwise killed solitary felids. However, it’s unknown if this would also apply to other species within the genus.

Paleoecology

Machairodus aphanistus seemed to prefer open woodland habitat, as evidenced by finds at Cerro de los Batallones, which is of Vallesian age. As a top predator at Batallones, it would have hunted large herbivores of the time. Large herbivores found at the Batallones site included horses like Hipparion (consumpution of Hipparion by Machairodus aphanistus is strongly supported by isotopic analysis of remains from Batallones), the hornless rhinoceros Aceratherium, the giraffes Decennatherium and Birgerbohlinia, the deer Euprox and Lucentia, the antelopes Paleoreas, Tragoportax, Miotragocerus and Dorcatherium, the “gomphotheridelephantoid Tetralophodon, the porcupine Hystrix, and the suid Microstonyx. Machairodus would have competed for such prey with the Amphicyonid Magericyon, fellow machairodonts Promegantereon and Paramachairodus, bears such as Agriotherium and Indarctos, and the small hyaenid Protictitherium. While Agriotherium and Magericyon would likely have been strongly competitive with Machairodus for food, Promegantereon, Paramachairodus and Protictitherium likely were less potential rivals. Evidence also exists indicating that Machairodus may have been prone to niche partitioning with Magericyon, possibly living in slightly different habitats, with the machairodont preferring more heavily vegetated habitats while the bear-dog hunted in the more open areas. Dietary preferences may also have played a role in the coexistence between these two large predators at Batallones.

Machairodus horribilis lived in a multitude of paleoenvironments such as open woodland and open grassland. It shared its environment with forested mammals such as primates, chalicotheres, and the deer Eostyloceros. While in open grassland, it coexisted with Hipparion and giraffids, although the latter was rare. This species of Machairodus was probably a hunter of Hipparion. It would have also lived alongside the large pig Kubanochoerus.

M. lahayishupup is found is Hemphillian rocks from Chalk Hills Formation, Rattlesnake Formation, McKay Formation, and Ogallala Formation. It coexisted with other Miocene animals such as Teleoceras fossiger, Indarctos oregonensis, and Hemiauchenia vera. This species would've would have most likely preyed on the large animals that it lived alongside, which included rhinoceroses, and Hemiauchenia.

References

  1. ^ Antón (2013).
  2. Roberts, George (1839). An etymological and explanatory dictionary of the terms and language of geology. London: Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, & Longmans. p. 103. Retrieved 31 December 2021.
  3. Antón (2013), pp. 118–119.
  4. J.A. Orlov (1936). "Tertiäre Raubtiere des westlichen Siberiens. I. Machairodontinae, Trav. Inst. Paléozool". Acad. Sci. URSS (in German). 5: 111–152.
  5. Kurtén, B. (1976). "Fossil Carnivora from the Late Tertiary of Bled Douarah and Cherichira, Tunisia". Notes du Service Géologique de Tunisie. 42: 177–214.
  6. Beaumont, G. de (1978). "Notes complementaires sur quelques fe´lide´s (Carnivores)". Archives des Sciences, Gene've. 31: 219–27.
  7. Lungu, A. N. (1978). "The Hipparion fauna of the middle Sarmatian of Moldavia (carnivorous mammals)". Izd. Shtiintsa, Kishinev (in Russian): 132.
  8. Ginsburg, L.; Morales, J.; Soria, D. (1981). "Nuevos datos sobre los carnívoros de los Valles de Fuentidueña (Segovia)". Estud Geol (in Spanish). 37: 383–415.
  9. Fernández-Monescillo, Marcos; Antón, Mauricio; Salesa, Manuel J. (2019). "Palaeoecological implications of the sympatric distribution of two species of Machairodus (Felidae, Machairodontinae, Homotherini) in the Late Miocene of los Valles de Fuentidueña (Segovia, Spain)". Historical Biology. 31 (7): 903–913. Bibcode:2019HBio...31..903F. doi:10.1080/08912963.2017.1402894. hdl:11336/57309. S2CID 135103217.
  10. Sotnikova, M. V. (1991). "A new species of Machairodus from the late Miocene Kalmakpai locality in eastern Kazakhstan (USSR)". Annales Zoologici Fennici. 28 (3/4): 361–369. JSTOR 23735460.
  11. Domingo, M. Soledad; Alberdi, M. Teresa; Azanza, Beatriz; Silva, Pablo G.; Morales, Jorge (2013-05-01). Farke, Andrew A. (ed.). "Origin of an Assemblage Massively Dominated by Carnivorans from the Miocene of Spain". PLOS ONE. 8 (5): e63046. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...863046D. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063046. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 3641116. PMID 23650542.
  12. ^ Turner, Alan (1997). The Big Cats and Their Fossil Relatives. Illustrated by Mauricio Antón. Columbia University Press. p. 233. ISBN 978-0-231-10228-5.
  13. ^ Antón, Mauricio; Salesa, Manuel J.; Siliceo, Gema (2013). "Machairodont adaptations and affinities of the Holarctic late Miocene homotherin Machairodus(Mammalia, Carnivora, Felidae): the case of Machairodus catocopis Cope, 1887". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 33 (5): 1202–1213. Bibcode:2013JVPal..33.1202A. doi:10.1080/02724634.2013.760468. hdl:10261/93630. ISSN 0272-4634. S2CID 86067845.
  14. Jiangzuo, Qigao; Werdelin, Lars; Sanisidro, Oscar; Yang, Rong; Fu, Jiao; Li, Shijie; Wang, Shiqi; Deng, Tao (2023-04-26). "Origin of adaptations to open environments and social behaviour in sabretoothed cats from the northeastern border of the Tibetan Plateau". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 290 (1997). doi:10.1098/rspb.2023.0019. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 10113030. PMID 37072045.
  15. Jiangzuo, Qigao; Werdelin, Lars; Sun, Yuanlin (May 2022). "A dwarf sabertooth cat (Felidae: Machairodontinae) from Shanxi, China, and the phylogeny of the sabertooth tribe Machairodontini". Quaternary Science Reviews. 284. Article 107517. Bibcode:2022QSRv..28407517J. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2022.107517.
  16. Salesa, Manuel J.; Hernández, Bárbara; Marín, Pilar; Siliceo, Gema; Martínez, Irene; Antón, Mauricio; García-Real, María Isabel; Pastor, Juan Francisco; García-Fernández, Rosa Ana (June 2024). "New insights on the ecology and behavior of Machairodus aphanistus (Carnivora, Felidae, Machairodontinae) through the paleopathological study of the fossil sample from the Late Miocene (Vallesian, MN 10) of Cerro de los Batallones (Torrejón de Velasco, Madrid, Spain)". Journal of Mammalian Evolution. 31 (2). doi:10.1007/s10914-024-09721-8. ISSN 1064-7554.
  17. Turner, Alan (1997). The Big Cats and their fossil relatives. Columbia University Press. pp. 45. ISBN 9780231102292.
  18. Fernandez-Monescillo, Marcos; Anton, Mauricio; Salesa, Manuel.J (2017). "Alaeoecological implications of the sympatric distribution of two species of Machairodus (Felidae, Machairodontinae, Homotherini) in the Late Miocene of Los Valles de Fuentidueña (Segovia, Spain)". Historical Biology. 31 (7): 903–913. Bibcode:2019HBio...31..903F. doi:10.1080/08912963.2017.1402894. hdl:11336/57309. S2CID 135103217.
  19. Giovanni G. Bellani (2019). Felines of the World. Discoveries in Taxonomic Classification and History. Elsevier Science. p. 31. ISBN 9780128172773. Retrieved 19 September 2022.
  20. ^ Switek, Brian (November 3, 2016). "The Biggest Saber Cat". Scientific American. Retrieved 2019-05-22.
  21. Sokol, Joshua (14 March 2020). "They Knew Saber-Toothed Tigers Were Big. Then They Found This Skull". The New York Times.
  22. "Newly identified saber-toothed cat is one of largest in history".
  23. ^ Orcutt, John D.; Calede, Jonathan J.M. (2021). "Quantitative Analyses of Feliform Humeri Reveal the Existence of a Very Large Cat in North America During the Miocene". Journal of Mammalian Evolution. 28 (3): 729–751. doi:10.1007/s10914-021-09540-1. S2CID 235541255.
  24. de Lazaro, Enrico (4 May 2021). "Giant Saber-Toothed Cat Roamed North America during Miocene | Paleontology | Sci-News.com". Sci.News: Breaking Science News. Retrieved 18 December 2022.
  25. ^ Deng, Tao; Zhang, Yun-Xiang. "A skull of Machairodus horribilis and new evidence for gigantism as a mode of mosaic evolution in machairodonts (Felidae, Carnivora)". Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 54: 302–318 – via ResearchGate.
  26. Legendre, S.; Roth, C. (1988). "Correlation of carnassial tooth size and body weight in recent carnivores (Mammalia)". Historical Biology. 1 (1): 85–98. Bibcode:1988HBio....1...85L. doi:10.1080/08912968809386468.
  27. Antón, Mauricio; Siliceo, Gema; Pastor, Juan Francisco; Morales, Jorge; Salesa, Manuel J. (2020). "The early evolution of the sabre-toothed felid killing bite: The significance of the cervical morphology of Machairodus aphanistus (Carnivora: Felidae: Machairodontinae)". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 188: 319–342. doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz086.
  28. Antón (2013), pp. 183–184.
  29. ^ Salesa, Manuel J.; Hernández, Bárbara; Marín, Pilar; Siliceo, Gema; Martínez, Irene; Antón, Mauricio; García-Real, María Isabel; Pastor, Juan Francisco; García-Fernández, Rosa Ana (31 May 2024). "New insights on the ecology and behavior of Machairodus aphanistus (Carnivora, Felidae, Machairodontinae) through the paleopathological study of the fossil sample from the Late Miocene (Vallesian, MN 10) of Cerro de los Batallones (Torrejón de Velasco, Madrid, Spain)". Journal of Mammalian Evolution. 31 (2). doi:10.1007/s10914-024-09721-8. ISSN 1064-7554.
  30. Anton, Mauricio; Salesa, Manuel J.; Morales, Jorge; Turner, Alan (2004). "First known complete skulls of the scimitar-toothed cat Machairodus aphanistus (Felidae, Carnivora) from the Spanish late Miocene site of Batallones-1". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 24 (4): 957. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2004)024[0957:FKCSOT]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0272-4634.
  31. Domingo, M. Soledad; Domingo, Laura; Abella, Juan; Valenciano, Alberto; Badgley, Catherine; Morales, Jorge (August 2016). "Feeding ecology and habitat preferences of top predators from two Miocene carnivore-rich assemblages". Paleobiology. 42 (3): 489–507. Bibcode:2016Pbio...42..489D. doi:10.1017/pab.2015.50. ISSN 0094-8373.
  32. Antón (2013), p. 52.
  33. Switek, Brian (November 30, 2012). "Carnivorous Neighbors — How Sabercats and a Bear Dog Managed to Coexist". National Geographic. Archived from the original on 2013-01-23. Retrieved 2019-05-22.
  34. Weisberger, Mindy (November 7, 2016). "Saber-Toothed Cat Had a Huge Skull, But a Puny Bite". Live Science. Retrieved 2019-05-22.
  35. Marie Morales (May 5, 2021). "Sabre-Toothed Cat From 9 Million Years Ago Could Take Down Prey 10 Times Its Size". The Science Times. Retrieved May 9, 2021.
  36. David Nield (8 May 2021). "Newly Identified Species of Saber-Toothed Cat Was So Big It Hunted Rhinos in America". ScienceAlert. Retrieved 9 May 2021.
  • Antón, Mauricio (2013). Sabertooth. Bloomington, Indiana: University of Indiana Press. ISBN 9780253010421.
Machairodontinae
Homotherini Smilodon fatalis
Metailurini
Smilodontini
Incertae sedis:
Taxon identifiers
Machairodus
Machairodus aphanistus
Machairodus
Machairodus lahayishupup
Categories: