Misplaced Pages

User talk:HJ Mitchell: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:51, 7 June 2010 editHJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,932 edits →Qassim Afzal: done← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:24, 14 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,305,781 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:HJ Mitchell/Archive 138) (bot 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Administrator topicon}}{{oversight topicon}}
{{User:HJ Mitchell/header}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}
|maxarchivesize = 70K |maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 9 |counter = 138
|minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadsleft = 1
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(2d) |algo = old(150h)
|archive = User talk:HJ Mitchell/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:HJ Mitchell/Archive %(counter)d
}}{{bots|deny=SineBot}}
}}
<!-- ******New messages go AT THE BOTTOM. Please don't edit above this line. Thank you.****** -->
<div style="padding: 5px; background: #008080; border: 1px solid #006633">
{{-}}
<center>
== IPBE request ==
<font color= "coral">'''Hello there and welcome to HJ's talk page. If you're here because I left a message on your talk page, please reply there and leave <nowiki>{{</nowiki>]|"''Your Username''"|"''Name of the section''"}} in a new section here but ''please'' leave a time stamp (<nowiki>~~~~~</nowiki>) so the bot can archive it!, I will endeavour to do the same for you unless you request otherwise, you're here to point me to a discussion elsewhere, or I know you're watching this page but I have been known to forget, so you might want to check back if you don't receive a timely response! If you have a question, ask me. If I know the answer, I'll tell you, if I don't, I'll find out, then we'll have both learned something! Above all, whatever I did, please know that I meant it in ] and please ].'''</font>
</center>
</div>
{| class="Talk-Notice"
|-
|<center>]</center>
|<center><font color="red">'''Admins: If you feel I have erred in one of my admin actions, just correct it. I won't consider it wheel warring if you leave me a note explaining what you did and why!'''</font></center>
|}
{{WP:TPS/banner|75}}
<center>'''A list of archives of this talk page may be viewed by ]. Those in Roman numerals come first chronologically'''</center>


My current IP range (]) was blocked by you last year. This is preventing me from moving pages, despite having moved pages until as recently as yesterday, and I haven't changed my connection since then. It seems that my IP was reassigned. Can you please grant me ] so that I can continue my regular editing activities? Thanks! <span class="nowrap">&#8212;''']'''</span> <sup class="nowrap">(] • {]•]})</sup> 14:32, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
== An Award! ==


:@] I see ] despite the block but it's probably not doing much at this point so I've made it anon-only. You shouldn't have any more problems. ] &#124; ] 16:41, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
<br>
::Thanks! <span class="nowrap">&#8212;''']'''</span> <sup class="nowrap">(] • {]•]})</sup> 05:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
{{User:QwerpQwertus/The Puzzle Piece Award}}
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #ffcc99;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | You've been rewarded the ] - ]! <small><small> ~ ]</small></small> <small><small>---------------------</small></small> ]
|}


== War memorials in Surrey ==
== ] ==


Hi {{ping|HJ Mitchell}} Hope you are well and Happy New Year! {{u|Murgatroyd49}} and I have been thinking about the ] page, and whether it would be appropriate to split out the war memorials into their own list. There are currently over 70 war memorials listed on the page, but I think that there are at least another 50 (quite possibly another 100 more). A split would give us the opportunity to include indoor memorials – I know of about a dozen villages that don't have an outdoor monument but that do have a plaques inside their churches, for example.<br>
The protection of the page on the version advocated by some does not accord to the requested consensus by the same protection. Neither does it encourage those users to be more constructive. The request for edit was not even requesting the deletion of the claim. It was a request to input that the issue is being discussed. What were the bases for rejection considering this? ] (]) 04:28, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
We agree that if we are to go ahead, it would be worth rethinking the way that we format the list and considering what information should be displayed for each memorial. We have been playing around with some possible layouts at ]. We think it is worth exploring these options before formally proposing the split. Would you be able to drop by and let us know what you think please? We have started a discussion at ]. There is also the question of breaking up the table by grouping the memorials into different categories by design/appearance.<br>
:I declined it because {{tl|editprotected}} is only for uncontroversial requests or those that have consensus because ] is a lot more difficult when only admins can edit the page. The protection expires tomorrow anyway, so you can make the edit yourself. Sorry, 16:18, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
I have half an eye on a potential Featured List nomination in the very far future, so I am keen to make sure that any formatting and categorisation decisions we take now would not prevent a successful nomination.
::Understood. But I thought marking that the sentence (for which the edit-wars started and the page was protected) is disputed and link it to the discussion is an uncontraversial change, because it just projected the reality :). Regards, ] (]) 12:41, 2 June 2010 (UTC) ] (]) 12:42, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
:::Pst... can you keep an eye on the article? it is again becoming a battle-ground :(. ] (]) 21:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC) Thanks and best wishes ] (]) 12:27, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
::::I'll add it to my watchlist. Anything in particular I should be looking for or just the usual edit warring? ] &#124; ] 21:12, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
:::::The edit warring in general. There's an editor that doesn't want to edit after discussions and compromise and he jumped into it just at once after the block on the article was lifted. He did the same thing on ] Article. I remember the ] speaks of this type of behavior. There's also a big Arbitration case against a large group of editors conducting their actions on Misplaced Pages and harassing people in real life now taking place in Ru.WP ] where the editors involved in these and other articles in En.WP are participating. Don't know if it's relevant. ] (]) 13:34, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
::::::Hmm, well if anybody specifically is edit warring or generally causing trouble or making a nuisance of themselves on en.wiki, I might be able to do something, but unfortunately what happens on ru.wiki will have to be dealt with by the admins there. I'm keeping an eye on things there, though, don't worry. ] &#124; ] 13:46, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
:::::::Yes, they do have to deal with that themselves, but if the editors are conspiring and agreeing on every move (on en.wiki too) it should be brought up here too, right? Maybe I should file an Arbitration on en.wiki soon oo. Thanks for watching! ] (]) 19:53, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
::::::::I did some poking around and it looks like it's already subject to discretionary sanctions from a previous arbitration case, so if there's anyone being particularly disruptive, I can take action as an uninvolved admin. ] &#124; ] 19:55, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Grandmaster, Brandmeister and Parishan are the most active. But they have calmed down due to these activities now. I think they're busy with the case at the moment.


== ''The Bugle'': Issue 225, January 2025 ==
From their conversations it is obvious they have a connection to the Azeri media and press as well and they are putting recruiting announcements on them periodically calling for edit-warring in Misplaced Pages. As a result there's now this whole thing taking place. I have invited the attention of Admins to it on ANI once or twice.


{| style="width: 100%;"
So now we have a group of 26 members under arbitratin. And these are yet the ones that could have been spotted. Also it's a closed circle, in a way, and I wonder how many miscellaneous editors we have of this type. ] (]) 07:59, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |

{|
== ] ==
| ]

| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>
Hello ], could you post a copy of a recently deleted article to my sub-page? Yes, there is always one lone voice out there never satisfied :-). The article ] was recently deleted through consensus at a AFD, as shown by the previous supplied link. I believe, in the near future, we will be able to bring this piece up to the standards required under notability guidelines. Thanks for your help. Regards. <font face="Times New Roman">] <sup>]</sup></font> 18:26, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
:Certainly, give me a moment. ] &#124; ] 18:28, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
* Project news: '']''
:May I help you? ] (]) 22:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
* Articles: '']''
::Thanks appreciate the quick respone....and of course....all help is welcome....This is Misplaced Pages :-). <font face="Times New Roman">] <sup>]</sup></font> 02:02, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
* Book review: '']''

* Op-ed: '']''
== IP Vandal ==
</div>

|-
Thank you for blocking ] ] ] ] ]. He is quite persistent. Can you do more please? Eg semi protect ]. ] ] 14:08, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
|}
:I'm not sure that's such a great idea considering he's not causing that much disruption and there are constructive IP edits to that article (it's actually on my watchlist and I've not seen very much of this guy). I can give you rollback if you like to make reverting him easier, but for now I think we should go with ]. ] &#124; ] 14:16, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
|}
::I have rollback thank you. I don't know how to slap him with an "only warning" sticker. Whenever I see your name I think ] of ] fame. ] ] 14:25, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">
:::Not according to my checks (yes, I stalk everyone who posts here!). You have autoreviewer, but not rollback. I can rectify that in three clicks if you want. As to "only warnings", if he's just IP hopping, there's probably not much point. If he get really annoying, I'll plat whack-a-mole with a series of short blocks. ] &#124; ] 14:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
''The Bugle'' is published by the ]. To receive it on your talk page, please ] or sign up ].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from ]. Your editors, ] (]) and ] (]) 07:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
::::Oh. Then yes please. ] ] 14:37, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
</div>
:::::Done. Just remember, vandalism only, no edit warring, etc etc. :) ] &#124; ] 14:39, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=1266423875 -->

== IRC ==

Please pop in #wikinews. Need to talk with you. --] <sup>]</sup> 16:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

== Akkadian Empire ==

Thank you for your assistance on this.] (]) 16:49, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

== ] ==

Please be more careful when deleting image files featured (or will be featured) on Main Page. This cropped image has been uploaded to English Misplaced Pages only, so you shouldn't use the <nowiki>{{C-uploaded}}</nowiki> tag, nor should you delete it, since it is likely to be used for OTD next year as well. --] (]) 16:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
:Fair enough, but surely it makes more sense to restore it next year if it's used. ] &#124; ] 17:05, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
::Because? It doesn't do any harm to leave it without deleting it, but it certainly does harm if we forget to restore it next year. --] (]) 17:15, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

== Sesame Street ==

Sorry about that. Just another *facepalm* moment. Perhaps I should get a bit more sleep. :)<span style="font-family:Calibri">] <small>(] &#124; ])</small></span> 17:27, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
:No worries! Looks like there ''is'' vandalism there but not recently enough for protection to do much good. ] &#124; ] 17:29, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
::I'll keep an eye on it. <span style="font-family:Calibri">] <small>(] &#124; ])</small></span> 17:37, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hi HJ, just checking in. Was there something else that needed to be done that I missed before you go over the article for GA review? Since last I wrote you, the overlinks were removed and most of the unreliable sources were replaced. There's only one {{tl|fv}} tag left, and I honestly can't find any source for it (Canon Singapore). I've asked for help on the talk page, but little to no response. So we can either leave it or remove it, let me know what you think. Or maybe it won't affect the GA at all. – <i><font color="#104FFF">Ker</font><font color="#187FFF">αun</font><font color="#18AFFF">oςc</font><font color="#18DFFF">op</font><font color="#18FFFF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">]</font></sub></i> 18:38, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
:I'll have a look in a bit. Obviously it would be nice if we could find a proper source, but if there isn't one available and the information attached to the tag isn't essential, I'd suggest removing it- I can't pass the GAN until it's resolved :(. Anyway, I'll be over there in a bit to take a look. ] &#124; ] 18:52, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

::Oh! Had I known it would stall the GA, I would've removed the info. I'll do so now. – <i><font color="#104FFF">Ker</font><font color="#187FFF">αun</font><font color="#18AFFF">oςc</font><font color="#18DFFF">op</font><font color="#18FFFF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">]</font></sub></i> 22:42, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

::Okay, info was removed. Although I've no doubt it was added in good faith a long time ago, I spent quite a bit of time, several days ago, looking for a reference, including Google's news archives, and was not able to dig up any information that supported the phrase tagged {{tl|fv}}, so it's now removed. I don't see any other tags, AL doesn't seem to have any hidden categories that make me nervous, several people have trimmed the lede down, and the article has actually remained stable for the most part in the last couple of days; so the article should be 100% ready for your review. Thanks! – <i><font color="#104FFF">Ker</font><font color="#187FFF">αun</font><font color="#18AFFF">oςc</font><font color="#18DFFF">op</font><font color="#18FFFF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">]</font></sub></i> 22:51, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
:::Excellent. I'll take my admin hat off and put my GA reviewer hat on :). ] &#124; ] 22:57, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hi HJ Mitchell, would you mind having a look at ]? In my opinion the recent change doesn't make sense and breaks numerous existing uses of the template.

Regards, ] (]) 19:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
:Replied at ]. ] &#124; ] 19:10, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
::Thanks for the quick reaction!
::Regards, ] (]) 19:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

== Wikinews - Turkey bans Google ==

i edited and developed the article regarding your comments. i hope you have time to re-check the article.

--] (]) 19:51, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

== Your opinion ==

{{tb|White Shadows#Request to nominate for adminship.}}
Just asking for your honest POV on this. Thanks.--] <sup>]</sup> 20:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

== Thank you! ==

]HJ Mitchell - Thank for your participation and support in my RfA.

I can honestly say that your comments and your trust in me are greatly appreciated.

Please let me know if you ever have any suggestions for me as an editor, or comments based on my admin actions.

Thank you! ] 23:10, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

== support ==

The last option that you mentioned in the RFC lacks your support/oppose. Although I AGF, it appears to be a joke. Perhaps you could add your support to it? ] (]) 23:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

== Mail? ==

Thanks for the user block re ] and the unblock at ]. Thought you may have been going for an early night 'today' (but you're back!). I have had a ''late'' night myself. Did you get my mail? Cuppa? {{notice|image=Face-smile.svg|
<center><big>'''Someone has poured you ].'''</big></center>|small=yes}}

] '''(])''' <sup>]</sup> 00:38, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:Hmm, mail. I haven't seen it- another reason you should get an account- then you can email me via WP's system (and I can confirm you and generally make editing ''so'' much easier for you)! I'll check all my various email addresses in case it got lost somewhere! As to the SMH, you're welcome. It had been protected for a while, so I thought unprotection was worth a try. I'm always on around this time- 00:00UTC is switchover time on the Main Page so someone has to check that the TFA is move protected, check the balance of the columns, make sure all the images are protected and have their licensing info! It's not that easy being an admin! Thanks for the cuppa, though (you got anything stronger...?) ] &#124; ] 00:51, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

::How about this, ] some in the tea and It'll help you nod off! Which I need to do a little of even though it is morning! Ah Johhny Walker, I miss him! Have not seen him around recently! <sigh>. I'll have to check that e-mail address, it was the one you gave me in May when you wanted to vent something about the 'peanut gallery', I think it was. Or ping me on my one, I haven't used that ''exact'' one since December '09 but I mailed myself to check so apparently it is still working. --] '''(])''' <sup>]</sup>-01:13, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:::Hmm, getting closer! ;) In that case, I've probably got it, I'll have to more closely examine the contents of my inbox in the morning (it's currently full of "I tried to advertise on WP and you deleted it" type crap!). While I'm thinking about it, why don't you set up an account, use it for a little while and if you don't think much to it, you can just go back to being 220.101....? ] &#124; ] 01:31, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
← Waddaya want, Black Label? or how about some:] '''<big>?</big>''' Account? Hmm,...thinking. --] '''(])''' <sup>]</sup>-02:10, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:Hmm, I've got a 15 year old bottle of single malt knocking around somewhere, but it's a bit late to be cracking open expensive whisky now! ] &#124; ] 02:16, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
::Yeh, Keep the cheap(er) stuff for 'sleep enhancement' {{;)}}. Tis' late so I'll let you go for now. By the way ] ''certainly'' ain't God, cause I think God works ''for'' Jimbo! ] --] '''(])''' <sup>]</sup>-02:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:::Don't get me wrong, I've no problem with the guy, but the way some people talk about him, if you didn't know better, you'd think they were talking about some mystical deity. As far as I'm concerned, he's just another editor for all intents and purposes. Let me know what conclusion you come to about an account, but for now, I need sleep ;). Even admins need to sleep! Sometimes. ] &#124; ] 02:32, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

== Re: Yet another ban proposal ==

That was not the most drama-reducing proposal, and probably didn't help a whole lot...

I'm not quite at the "that's troutable" level on this, but it would help if admins didn't do things that increase drama.

Thanks. ] (]) 01:08, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:Alas, you're probably right. Not that I have anything at al against those three editors but I'm just so sick of seeing them carry on such pathetic arguments in any forum they can find! Ah well, I probably just need sleep! ] &#124; ] 01:31, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

== ] ==

I found your closure of this AfD as keep, without any explanation of your rationale, surprising. Purely numerically there were three editors for delete and three for keep, but two of the keep rationales were based simply on ] so should carry little weight. Whilst it's a judgment call, I certainly don't see a "keep" result there; I appreciate that you did, but its not so obvious it needed no explanation. The AfD also cited ] which itself cites two other AfDs - all of which are near-identical and resulted in delete and again, your reasoning for coming to a different conclusion would have been appreciated. ] (]) 08:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:Frankly all the arguments made in that AfD were pretty weak. Personally, if I'd opined, I would have gone woith a delete !vote, but analysing the discussion as it is, nobody had commented in over a week so, after the nom, we have, in order:
*]
*"Jut not encyclopaedic"
*The only !voter to actually provide a rationale for their opinion
*"Just not encyclopaedic"
*and finally, another othercrap argument
:Given that the only strong, or even valid, argument besides the nomination was a keep !vote, I closed it as keep, but you may consider this leave to re-nominate in a few weeks when hopefully the discussion will attract more participation. ] &#124; ] 16:34, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

== Ever reviewed a GA? ==

(pretend it's an ad) Well now you can by reviewing <!-- my --> the article ]! Just follow the Good Article Criteria and tell me of any issues! But wait there's more, act now and you'll get a free.....well I've got nothing just please review this thing for me. I need this for the WikiCup as Casliber is catching up to me and this article has been awaiting a GA review since mid May.--] <sup>]</sup> 16:41, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:PS: Can you please delete the redirected page ] so I can move my sandbox article ] to that page? Thanks.--] <sup>]</sup> 16:51, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
::OK, I'll have a look later on (and yes, about 50 in response to the title!) ;). You sure you've got the right link there, that's not a redirect... ] &#124; ] 16:53, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:::I think you meant IX'''''B''''', so that's where I've stuck it (I didn't leave redirect behind, but I figured you'd only have me delete it under U1 later). ] &#124; ] 16:57, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
::::Thanks I did mean IXB :) As for the review, go for it!--] <sup>]</sup> 17:01, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

== Thanks! ==

. Dare I reveal my ignorance by asking what happens next? Obviously, I have a slight agenda here, in that I'm really asking "will the userfication happen", rather than "talk me through the nitty-gritty of processes that I should already know about"...!

Cheers, ]<sup>]</sup> 18:59, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:I've no issue with userfication as long as the creator is aware that WP isn't a web host and it may be MfD'd if it just sits there indefinitely. As for the nitty-gritty, if the article hadn't been deleted, I'd just move it to an appropriate place, unticking the "leave a redirect behind" box that admins get. Since it's been deleted, I'll restore it first, then do exactly the same. ] &#124; ] 19:05, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
::No worries. I can move to their userspace if you let me know when I can. If I'd been on the ball I'd have done that prior to posting at ANI... Regardless, I'll let them know about what's required. Ta! 19:07, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:::But you can't move without a redirect (yet!) so you would have had to have tagged the redirect for speedy, meanwhile the AfD says it was deleted but it's a bluelink. Basically, it's esier if you're an admin! I've stuck it at ]. ] &#124; ] 19:10, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
::::Thanks! I've volunteered myself for any further questions. I'm a Linux person, so I see the motivation, but I'm not convinced it's a Linux distribution that meets ] yet. ]<sup>]</sup> 19:17, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

== Qassim Afzal ==

I have serious concerns about your ]. In particular:
* (which had most sources, but not all) doesn't look like a "local newspaper". Neither , for example.
* Even if they were, I have never heard consensus that local news are not considered RS.
* The fact that other sources don't verify "basic biographic information" seems irrelevant in face of ] and similar guidelines -we can simply avoid to give such information and stick to what is effectively in sources (if I am wrong, please link the appropriate guideline).
In the light of above (and of your "reluctance" mentioned in the close statement), can I hope in a reconsideration of the close? Thanks! --]] 20:25, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
::Well, if you genuinely have "serious concerns", then I suggest you raise them at ], but if you're just expressing a strongly held opinion, I'll take it as that. As I recall, neither of the sources above were in the article (but I'll check the deleted content in a minute). Local news sources can be RS, but they don't do a lot for establishing notability- for example, coverage in the '']'' would do less for notability than coverage in, say, '']'' (just example). My reluctance in closing it that way was that I felt it could have gone the other way if a few more people had made strong keep arguments and actually improved the article and its sourcing. ] &#124; ] 20:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:::I was thinking about DRV from the start, in fact. :) About "improving the article", well, it's not the status of the article that counts, but the subject itself (]). In fact, there is the opposite problem: people (including myself) are often wary of touching AfD'ed articles because they feel their work would be wasted if it closes as delete anyway. So, better to bring the arguments and sources before and then waiting a decision. --]] 23:15, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
::::Well I have to say that, in borderline cases, a few edits to improve the sourcing can make all the difference. If you'd like, I can userfy it for you to work on and you can move it back into the mainspace after it's been sourced and there's been a reasonable "grace period" since the AfD... ] &#124; ] 23:21, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:::::Good idea, please do! How much time would you advice to wait (in any case it won't be less than a month due to real life stuff)? --]] 14:46, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
::::::A month seems reasonable. I'll sort that out for you now. ] &#124; ] 14:48, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
:::::::It's now at ]. ] &#124; ] 14:51, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

== ] ==

Hello! Please note that when cropping an image for the main page, it should be uploaded under a different filename (with "cropped" appended) to preserve the original file's appearance within articles. (Instead of the {{tl|c-uploaded}} tag, the {{tl|m-cropped}} template is used). Thank you! —] 20:27, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:Indeed. I forgot when I was cropping that file- I was in a hurry! ] &#124; ] 20:46, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

== Talkback ==

{{Talkback|Shirik|I appreciate the thought}} ] <small>(])</small> 22:32, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

== To present/onward ==

I finally got around to starting a discussion about the date range issue, and I'm curious as to what the responses will be. If you're interested in chiming in or simply following along, the discussion is at ] – <i><font color="#104FFF">Ker</font><font color="#187FFF">αun</font><font color="#18AFFF">oςc</font><font color="#18DFFF">op</font><font color="#18FFFF">ia<sup>◁</sup></font><sub><font color="#5E1FFF">]</font></sub></i> 23:02, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
:I'm equally curious, but I don;t have much to add, so I'm just watching. :) ] &#124; ] 23:22, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

== Friendly heads up. ==

So I guess 4chan is mad at you or something. Heads up, you'll probably be getting a lot of spam. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:20, 6 June 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Re:In case you're not watching it ==

{{talkback|MC10|In case you're not watching it|ts=00:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)}} <span class="plainlinks">—'''<font color="#9370DB">]</font> <small><font color="#4169E1">(]•]•]•)</font></small>'''</span> 00:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

{{talkback|MC10|In case you're not watching it|ts=00:51, 7 June 2010 (UTC)}} <span class="plainlinks">—'''<font color="#9370DB">]</font> <small><font color="#4169E1">(]•]•]•)</font></small>'''</span> 00:51, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

== ] ==

re: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=MediaWiki%3ARobots.txt&action=historysubmit&diff=365898941&oldid=353973694

You need to close the source tag, too; the /pre is still at the bottom ;) ] 03:24, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

:Sorry- you know I'm useless with markup! ;) Is better? ] &#124; ] 03:27, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

:: Ya. Tags should be balanced. The same rule applies to some templates, too; see (scroll to the end of the diff past a lot of miscellaneous nits). This pair of templates should travel as a pair. The core issue with all the stuff re markup and colors is that most users have no clue about markup. But some are just full of opinion, anyway. They need to see ]. Cheers, ] 03:45, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
:::Hey, it's the same with being an admin- plenty of armchair generals with no appreciation for the difficulties of the job! That's Misplaced Pages (and life in general) for you. ] &#124; ] 13:04, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

== Custom welcome page spread by Diego Grez onto ~1000 user pages ==

Hi Mitchell,

RE:Diego Grez

I'm not sure that this custom welcome page spread by Diego Grez onto ~1000 user pages is such a good idea. It's really unorthodox. And it also spreads following images:
* Potential privacy/privacy of a minor issues: ] ~ 1000 pages
* Likely without permission: ] ~1000 pages
* ...

I've also seen IP users finding this welcome page downright offensive. Please consider replacing it with a regular welcome page.

--] (]) 05:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
:Erm, dDiego hasn't edited a user talk page besides mine and his (and one to Xeno's) since early January... ] &#124; ] 12:49, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

== Harassment again at my page ==


== Protect User Page ==
Hello Mitch, as you told me before and I understand that you could help to semi-protect my talk page (could use the indef-SPP right now, thanks!), but what about ? Looks awfully like JA or his clone operating under an , which is their usual MO. Anyway, I'm kind of indifferent to their nonsensical behaviour these days, meaning that I'm mildly irritated but I'm not angry at a mentally disturbed soul. Regards. --] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup> 09:29, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
:I've semi'd your talk page for another 6 months. I wouldn't worry too much- they seem to have new-found fascination with me after I used RevDel on the edit summaries from the latest round of Grawp page moves. Just ignore them and they'll get bored. Eventually. ] &#124; ] 12:56, 7 June 2010 (UTC)


How should Misplaced Pages defend the frenish page? Thanks in advance for the answer. Thank you. (] (]) 18:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
::*Many thanks for the little help. Going through the records, I must say that I've noticed about the current trend of disturbances (leading to the various RevDels all over WP) that has been going on for the last 2 weeks, their particular interest seems to be focused on the several Admins and editors who had crossed their path, you being one of them. But like you've mentioned, they will get bored by it, eventually. --] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup> 13:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)


== HighKing == == Help ==


How can I get Barnisteys on Misplaced Pages? How to upload a picture in Misplaced Pages? Thanks. (] (]) 18:32, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Perhaps you could also delete all his unfounded accusations. By the way, I posted NO personal information about him; I made a point of not doing so by leaving out vital elements. I tried to keep the whole issue confidential but he ws having none of it. ] (]) 13:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
:In the interests of fairness, and because HK obviously feels strongly about it, I should point out that you've only done half a job - two revisions of minor edits remain, therefore keeping the whole text. However, please pay attention to the background here, and also note that I HAVE NOT OUTED HIM, NOR DID I INTEND TO. I have not divulged ANY information that could lead anyone to his identity. He insisted on noting the fact that I'd sent him an email which he descibed as threatening. Not to put too finer point on it, he was asking for it to some extent. Maybe you could remove a whole string of related revisions, then we might get back on the stright and narrow. ] (]) 13:54, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
::Those two revisions shouldn't contain the information because the first had been deleted, but I've deleted them just in case. You posted an IP address and a location- regardless of your intent, that kind of information, unless specifically given by the subject, is private and has no place being posted on one of the most visible noticeboards on the wiki. As for the rest, I've no interest in what's going on between you and HK and that belongs on ANI, not here. ] &#124; ] 14:14, 7 June 2010 (UTC)


== click year ahead == == Block evasion by IP ==


Hi, it is regarding blocked IP. They have resumed with their caste-POV changes to the ] using . Similar diff examples - and . Have a look. Thanks. - ] (]) 18:32, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
You are obviously a few 'click years' ahead of me in wikipedia. You make an edit, at... 13:22 (Deletion log)‎... I cannot fathom its effect but hope you can answer for the simple reason that I am somehow linked to that edit and I try to understand what happens in wikipedia now and then. Thanks! ] (]) 14:19, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
:Do you have a ] or a page name so I know which action you're referring to? I had a look through my deletion log and couldn't find anything in my last 200 deletions with that timestamp, but if it was in the deletion log it was either a revision deletion (which removes an edit or an edit summary from the page history) or a page deletion (what it says- first it's there, then it's not). hope that helps. ] &#124; ] 14:26, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:24, 14 January 2025

Hello and welcome to my talk page! If you have a question, ask me. If I know the answer, I'll tell you; if I don't, I'll find out (or one of my talk-page stalkers might know!), then we'll both have learnt something!
Admins: If one of my admin actions is clearly a mistake or is actively harming the encyclopaedia, please reverse it. Don't wait for me if I'm not around or the case is obvious.
A list of archives of this talk page is here. Those in Roman numerals come first chronologically
This talk page is archived regularly by a bot so I can focus on the freshest discussions. If your thread was archived but you had more to say, feel free to rescue it from the archive.

IPBE request

My current IP range (Special:Contribs/223.177.0.0/16) was blocked by you last year. This is preventing me from moving pages, despite having moved pages until as recently as yesterday, and I haven't changed my connection since then. It seems that my IP was reassigned. Can you please grant me WP:IPBE so that I can continue my regular editing activities? Thanks! —CX Zoom 14:32, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

@CX Zoom I see the spam persists despite the block but it's probably not doing much at this point so I've made it anon-only. You shouldn't have any more problems. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:41, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks! —CX Zoom 05:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

War memorials in Surrey

Hi @HJ Mitchell: Hope you are well and Happy New Year! Murgatroyd49 and I have been thinking about the List of public art in Surrey page, and whether it would be appropriate to split out the war memorials into their own list. There are currently over 70 war memorials listed on the page, but I think that there are at least another 50 (quite possibly another 100 more). A split would give us the opportunity to include indoor memorials – I know of about a dozen villages that don't have an outdoor monument but that do have a plaques inside their churches, for example.
We agree that if we are to go ahead, it would be worth rethinking the way that we format the list and considering what information should be displayed for each memorial. We have been playing around with some possible layouts at User:Murgatroyd49/sandbox3. We think it is worth exploring these options before formally proposing the split. Would you be able to drop by and let us know what you think please? We have started a discussion at User talk:Murgatroyd49/sandbox3. There is also the question of breaking up the table by grouping the memorials into different categories by design/appearance.
I have half an eye on a potential Featured List nomination in the very far future, so I am keen to make sure that any formatting and categorisation decisions we take now would not prevent a successful nomination. Thanks and best wishes Mertbiol (talk) 12:27, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 225, January 2025

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Protect User Page

How should Misplaced Pages defend the frenish page? Thanks in advance for the answer. Thank you. (Abduvaitov Sherzod 80 (talk) 18:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Help

How can I get Barnisteys on Misplaced Pages? How to upload a picture in Misplaced Pages? Thanks. (Abduvaitov Sherzod 80 (talk) 18:32, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Block evasion by IP

Hi, it is regarding this blocked IP. They have resumed with their caste-POV changes to the WP:COMMONNAME using this news IP. Similar diff examples - and . Have a look. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:32, 13 January 2025 (UTC)