Misplaced Pages

:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser | IP check Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:30, 1 May 2007 view sourceLuk (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators44,791 edits ===Bobabobabo=== archived, rm 1 older than 7 days← Previous edit Revision as of 08:03, 2 May 2007 view source Luk (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators44,791 edits archiving ===Billy Ego/Regulations===Next edit →
Line 174: Line 174:
*{{user|Dyubong}} *{{user|Dyubong}}
:]·] 05:41, 1 May 2007 (UTC) :]·] 05:41, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

===Billy Ego/Regulations===
*{{checkuser|Billy Ego}}
*{{checkuser|Regulations}}
*{{checkuser|Hardrack}}
*{{checkuser|Truent}}
*{{checkuser|Regulation237}}
*{{checkuser|Monster Army}}
*{{checkuser|No Joke}}
*{{checkuser|Area of trust}}
*{{checkuser|Green man from space}}
*{{checkuser|Plant a tree}}
*{{checkuser|Necker}}
*{{checkuser|Wapmonsi}}
*{{checkuser|Wamonspop}}
''Since initial report here'':
*{{checkuser|Reg238}}

See ] above; sock puppets were identified and blocked, but Truent, Regulation237, Wapmonsi, and Wamonspop showed up. User has threatened further ban evasion and claims to have other sockpuppet accounts (, , ). Anything to be gained by checking and/or blocking the underlying IP or proxies? ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 21:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

{{confirmed}}; I'm not seeing an easy IP block that doesn't involve a lot of collateral. ]·] 04:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:03, 2 May 2007

Checkuser pages
Requests: UnlistedIP checkOn hold
Archives: MainOlderIP checksUnsorted
Clerk pages
Clerk OverviewNoticeboardProcedures
Shortcut
This page can be quickly accessed through:
WP:RFCU/IP/A

Requests for IP check

This page lists requests to identify and block the IP addresses behind attack and vandal accounts that were previously listed at Requests for checkuser/IP check. After the account has been reported as blocked or declined by the checkusers, the report is moved here for seven days (most recent sections at the bottom), after which it is deleted. Because there is no attempt to establish a relationship with a puppetmaster account, no separate archive is kept, other than the page history.


Vintagekits

There is an afd at which is me IRL. The first two editors have initiated this and have frequently commented. The last four editors have each made one contribution ONLY namely to delete the article. My question is - are any of the four the same as either of the first two or each other? I am sure the first two are not the same person. - Kittybrewster (talk) 16:33, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Coeur-sang has only one edit, and that's to the AFD. --kingboyk 18:46, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

  •  Inconclusive Note that this would normally not have been sufficient to get a checkuser; you didn't give nearly enough reasoning why there might be a suspicion. However, after finding one user had voted twice, I'd investigated this AFD in detail already. There doesn't seem to be any more obvious sockpuppeting, although some users are either new or returned from considerable absence, suggesting that canvassing for votes has been going on. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 21:12, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


Ararat arev

Another coordinated attack on Turkey by Ararat arev (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki). CMummert · talk 18:55, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Comment List above is hardly complete. Several more can be found here and here, but maybe the above will be sufficient for CheckUser to work with. – Riana 19:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Comment Discussion of community ban is here. Seraphimblade 19:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
I was checking and blocking these as they came in. I think the IP blocks are all current, but notify me if it starts up again. Dmcdevit·t 06:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 Delisted as apparently resolved, for now. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Hinomaru

Persistent vandal with a long history of sockpuppet usages (here is the list of his 124 sockpuppet accounts for reference). A checkuser request had been made and completed two weeks ago (see ), but the vandal has returned with other IPs. Kariteh 13:18, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

 IP blocked. Dmcdevit·t 09:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)


Holger the Dane

  • Code letter: G

There has been allot POV pushing in the Scaninavian articles. Seems like this are very much like the same. I am also quite sure that the user have more acounts than just these two.

Thank you for your time and concern into looking into this matter

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Comanche cph (talkcontribs)

Note that this request was made by User:Comanche cph who is no doubt the same person as Arigato1 against whom two recent RFCUs were filed. If this is indeed the same user, that will mean that this user is - yet again - trying to circumvent a block. Valentinian 15:04, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 Clerk note: See Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Holger_the_Dane. – Luna Santin (talk) 23:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
 Delisted per decline of related subpage request. – Luna Santin (talk) 04:21, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Bobabobabo

User evading ban using open proxies. Search and destroy for any other accounts as well as the open proxy.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:23, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

 IP blocked, other accounts:

Dmcdevit·t 05:41, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Billy Ego/Regulations

Since initial report here:

See Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Regulations above; sock puppets were identified and blocked, but Truent, Regulation237, Wapmonsi, and Wamonspop showed up. User has threatened further ban evasion and claims to have other sockpuppet accounts (, , ). Anything to be gained by checking and/or blocking the underlying IP or proxies? MastCell 21:31, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

 Confirmed; I'm not seeing an easy IP block that doesn't involve a lot of collateral. Dmcdevit·t 04:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Category: