| Revision as of 04:05, 13 May 2007 edit206.124.144.3 (talk) Explanation of New Source← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:45, 13 May 2007 edit undoJeandré du Toit (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers18,684 edits Notability.Next edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| I added Phil Johnson's blog ''Circle of Pneuma'' as a source for this article. Phil Johnson is the author of several books in this field including ''Jesus and the gods of the New Age'' Clifford & Johnson, Victor Books 2003 and ''Riding the Rollercoaster: How the Risen Christ Empowers Life'' Clifford & Johnson, Strand 1998. Therefore the blog ''Circle of Pneuma'' is considered a reliable and usable source according to Misplaced Pages policy ] ] 04:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC) | I added Phil Johnson's blog ''Circle of Pneuma'' as a source for this article. Phil Johnson is the author of several books in this field including ''Jesus and the gods of the New Age'' Clifford & Johnson, Victor Books 2003 and ''Riding the Rollercoaster: How the Risen Christ Empowers Life'' Clifford & Johnson, Strand 1998. Therefore the blog ''Circle of Pneuma'' is considered a reliable and usable source according to Misplaced Pages policy ] ] 04:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Notability.== | |||
| I think a reliable secondary source dealing with only Matrixism (instead of just listing it as an example of a weird new religion) would satisfy WP's notability requirements - which are exceptionally low. A blog post is not a reliable source. -- ], 2007-05-13]08:45z | |||
Revision as of 08:45, 13 May 2007
I added Phil Johnson's blog Circle of Pneuma as a source for this article. Phil Johnson is the author of several books in this field including Jesus and the gods of the New Age Clifford & Johnson, Victor Books 2003 and Riding the Rollercoaster: How the Risen Christ Empowers Life Clifford & Johnson, Strand 1998. Therefore the blog Circle of Pneuma is considered a reliable and usable source according to Misplaced Pages policy WP:SPS 206.124.144.3 04:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Notability.
I think a reliable secondary source dealing with only Matrixism (instead of just listing it as an example of a weird new religion) would satisfy WP's notability requirements - which are exceptionally low. A blog post is not a reliable source. -- Jeandré, 2007-05-13t08:45z