| Revision as of 23:37, 5 February 2007 editBenBurch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,364 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 20:57, 20 May 2007 edit undoTdl1060 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,141 edits removing from to-do list, specified immigration bills |
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
|
|wikify= |
|
|wikify= |
|
|merge= |
|
|merge= |
|
|
|cleanup=Inconsistent citation style. Fix dead links in citations. --] 16:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC) |
|
|cleanup= |
|
|
|expand= |
|
|expand= |
|
|disambiguation= |
|
|disambiguation= |
|
|stubs= |
|
|stubs= |
|
|update= |
|
|update= |
|
|
|npov= |
|
|npov=Education ''In the 1990s, according to the Daily Herald, Roskam supported three different state legislative plans to ban books from schools: one to ban the textbook series "impressions" from Arlington Heights schools...'' IMHO 'ban books' is POV. I'd like to change it to 'remove certain books'. Plus, the reader shouldn't have to go and research "Impressions" to find out what the objectionable content was.- ] 22:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|verify= |
|
|verify=Immigration ''Roskam supports the House bill on immigration reform.'' Which house bill? What does that bill propose? Is that the one with the 700 mile fence? That line tells the reader next to nothing, and I'm not even sure it refers to the postions described later in the paragraph. I'll try to expand and describe these two claims tonight. - ] 22:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|other= |
|
|other= |
|
}} |
|
}} |
