Revision as of 04:19, 21 May 2007 editJuJube (talk | contribs)44,091 edits →You're an Admin!: (dab link. also, i'm not suggesting you cheated, just some humor ;)← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:47, 21 May 2007 edit undoDuke53 (talk | contribs)4,075 edits →Duke53: comm.Next edit → | ||
Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
The IP address in question has made ''no'' useful contributions to the encyclopedia, and has in fact been entirely a nuisance. While Duke's response was a violation of ], I just can't bring myself to care. He was being taunted by a troll and vandal, and the only downside of Duke's comments is that the troll might enjoy that he's gotten a rise out of Duke. ](]) 02:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC) | The IP address in question has made ''no'' useful contributions to the encyclopedia, and has in fact been entirely a nuisance. While Duke's response was a violation of ], I just can't bring myself to care. He was being taunted by a troll and vandal, and the only downside of Duke's comments is that the troll might enjoy that he's gotten a rise out of Duke. ](]) 02:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
::I just noticed this exchange (and your 'reporting' of it) .... why would you care about an edit I made on my own talk page? Are you stalking me? Get a life, 'admin'. <font face="raphael" color="green">] | <sup>]</sup></font> 04:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
== happy == | == happy == |
Revision as of 04:47, 21 May 2007
Archives |
*blushes*
Thank you very much for the barnstar and your guidance. Your kind words are very much appreciated.-Malkinann 02:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Edit summary here
- Yes... soon the article will be fat enough to EAT! ^_^ JuJube 02:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Re: Checkuser
Hm. The check was responded to by Mackensen (one of the CUs), and it sounded to me like he was saying the other accounts came from a school he didn't feel entirely comfortable blocking (probably too much collateral damage?). But I could be misreading that. Either way, I don't think I've noticed too many problems, recently, so maaaaybe we're in the clear. – Luna Santin (talk) 18:44, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
"-tachi"
I didn't miss the Seiya one; I just didn't like the "and company" option. For some of the titles, one really needs to have seen the episode to get the nuance of the title, and I haven't seen that one. I would guess it's a Three Lights background story, and I would change it accordingly, if I knoew the plot contents. MSJapan 19:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
images
What do you mean about "We are not going to use episode screens, period"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zatchbellfan (talk • contribs) 18:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC).
O.k, I'm not being rude but are you telling me I have to reupload the "R" images again? Zatchbellfan
El Viaje Misterioso de Nuestro Jomer (The Mysterious Voyage of Homer)
Thank you for your review of the article. I have implemented your suggestions and it is ready for another look. Reduce tags have been added to the images, but it could take a while before they are reduced. -- Scorpion 04:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
SM NA anime alterations
Do you know of a reference for a list of alterations were made to the NA version of the anime? I know what they are myself, having seen both versions, but I cannot find a decent list. MSJapan 18:11, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
"no one can understand japanese not even japanese guys can understand it"
its true babe asl?? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Halth goals (talk • contribs) 17:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC).
- Amazing. --Masamage ♫ 21:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
The senshi's Profiles
I was just thinking you could add the senshi's birthstones on their bio pages on[REDACTED] and Wikimoon. Like for example, Ami's birthstone is a Sapphire. It's just a suggestion. Think about it and let me know. Neptunekh 20:53, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Inform GA
The copyrighted images were used fairly, in my opinion. I suggest you read the tag on the image's page, which states that in the absence of a free alternative, these images are allowed to be used. Furthermore, I suggest you don't nominate the article if you believe that these "instant fail" criteria have been breached by the article. Thanks. ~ G1ggy! Reply 06:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Images that do not include both a fair use tag and a detailed fair use rationale will be deleted! (from here)
- I'd have thought that if it did indeed break the fair use policy, it would be deleted, as per the policy. Thus, I had no reason to oppose it, on the basis that all of the article's other editors didn't oppose it.
- I apologise for my hostility, I will try to be more co-operative in the future. ~ G1ggy! Reply 07:02, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- As far as I can see, there IS a fair use tag on the image. It is tagged with Template:Non-free software screenshot, which is listed here. ~ G1ggy! Reply 07:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Everything mentioned by those dot points is found in the banner anyway. Oh, and sorry for the late reply, I was on holiday. ~ G1ggy! Reply 08:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- So do you want to take the GA back? ~ G1ggy! Reply 00:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- That's good news. So the GA stays? On an unrelated note, is that the IP that asked you to nominate the article? ~ G1ggy! Reply | Powderfinger! 00:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- So do you want to take the GA back? ~ G1ggy! Reply 00:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Everything mentioned by those dot points is found in the banner anyway. Oh, and sorry for the late reply, I was on holiday. ~ G1ggy! Reply 08:31, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- As far as I can see, there IS a fair use tag on the image. It is tagged with Template:Non-free software screenshot, which is listed here. ~ G1ggy! Reply 07:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Moonlight Knight
lol don't worry about it at all. by the way, I'm very impressed by all your work and stuff, very nice. Please Keep up the good work =) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silent Trik (talk • contribs)
hi
The Builder Award | ||
Its for you because im sure the world would be in chaos without you Can't we hate our allies and love our enemies 20:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC) |
- Uh, thanks? --Masamage ♫ 20:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
YW :} Can't we hate our allies and love our enemies 21:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Um, it appears this guy is going around to random people and giving them awards... confusing to say the least. His contribs show he's given the same thing to a lot of people, with no specific reason. CASCADIA/Trail 21:56, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- I noticed. Strange, but harmless for the moment. Probably somebody's sockpuppet. --Masamage ♫ 23:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
I reported User:Mr strike my leg stop i dont like fly for his recent edits like the one above. Please follow this link to add your thoughts on this incident. --Knowpedia 04:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Ami Mizuno
- I removed the sentence that talked about Ami's feeling towards boys (the one the anonymous changed to refer to Mercurius and Greg). I think it's kind of speculatory to talk about that. Just letting you know I wasn't reverting your change. :) JuJube 04:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
sorry
I'm so sorry I should not have used[REDACTED] I just messed everything up Dark spikey 19:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
What about being admin?
Duke53
While I agree that this edit doesn't represent the most temperate response, the editor in question (41.240.70.151 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)) was edit warring to insert a racist slur into a couple of different articles – using a variety of deceptive edit summaries – more than thirty times.
I can understand that Duke53 may well have been irked by this behaviour, and been goaded to impoliteness by the sheer gall of the troll who left an NPA warning on his page. (The troll also left 3RR warnings for another editor who reverted the vandalism.)
The IP address in question has made no useful contributions to the encyclopedia, and has in fact been entirely a nuisance. While Duke's response was a violation of WP:NPA, I just can't bring myself to care. He was being taunted by a troll and vandal, and the only downside of Duke's comments is that the troll might enjoy that he's gotten a rise out of Duke. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 02:28, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- I just noticed this exchange (and your 'reporting' of it) .... why would you care about an edit I made on my own talk page? Are you stalking me? Get a life, 'admin'. Duke53 | 04:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
happy
♥Eternal Pink-Ready to fight for love and grace♥ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Editing pages
I am in the middle of shifting the Human agency page. I discussed this with philosophy project people and put a notice on the page months ago. My talk on the Human agency page was just to let people know what is happening while I do it. Anarchia 00:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sigh, Thanks for the educational info... Anarchia 00:10, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help. I will ask you fo rhelp next time I want to do something radical. Should I change back all the links I edited? I really don't have time right now - I need to give a lecture in about half an hour!Anarchia 00:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
That IP troll is blocked 24h.
See ANI, and you're welcome. :) MSJapan 20:46, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
You're an Admin!
It is my pleasure to inform you that you are now an admin. Congratulations. You can feel free to do everything you're supposed to do and nothing you're not supposed to do. If you haven't already, now is the time look through the Misplaced Pages:Administrators' how-to guide and Misplaced Pages:Administrators' reading list. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or at the Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard. Best wishes and good luck, -- Cecropia 19:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, congratulations! – Luna Santin (talk) 19:57, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Yay heres some cookies to celebrate :P ♥Eternal Pink-Ready to fight for love and grace♥ 21:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulation, Masamage! «Snowolf » 21:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations, Masamage. Not only did you get the position, you got it unopposed, which speaks well to your behavior as a Wikipedian. Good job! :) Here, the Chort, have a trophy... JuJube 04:18, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Re: plot hole
Ack. X_x My mistake XD. Thanks for setting me straight. By the way, congrats on the adminship! -- RattleMan 00:14, 21 May 2007 (UTC)