Revision as of 05:53, 21 May 2007 view sourceDominic (talk | contribs)Administrators29,558 edits →Use the talk page: comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:53, 22 May 2007 view source Ghirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,657 edits TroublemakersNext edit → | ||
Line 295: | Line 295: | ||
:::::::::: Please use English, the use of strange language to insult the opponent is the wrong way to prove your point.--] 22:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC) | :::::::::: Please use English, the use of strange language to insult the opponent is the wrong way to prove your point.--] 22:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Kuban, since that ], it appears to me that Andriy has restricted his edits to the article's talk page, and you have continued edit warring, but with Hillock now. I think you both need to stop that, and I'll go ask him to stop now. You've been here for a while, and should be using talk pages and mediation, not just reverting repeatedly. Please try that instead. ]·] 05:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | :Kuban, since that ], it appears to me that Andriy has restricted his edits to the article's talk page, and you have continued edit warring, but with Hillock now. I think you both need to stop that, and I'll go ask him to stop now. You've been here for a while, and should be using talk pages and mediation, not just reverting repeatedly. Please try that instead. ]·] 05:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Troublemakers == | |||
--]<sup>]</sup> 08:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:53, 22 May 2007
2005: All
2006: Winter, spring, summer, autumn.Heading
(just to guide people on where to begin writing, hope no one minds me leaving the warm new year greetings)
Metro stations
As far as I remember, I promised to never touch spelling of metro stations until WP:CYR comes through, unless vandalism is involved. I still stand by that (even though WP:CYR is stagnant), but thought I'd ask you this. As you might have probably noticed, I am currently putting Russian geographic names in order, creating redirects and dab pages when necessary. So far my scope was limited to names of inhabited localities, districts, and federal subjects (which, mind you, is quite a handful already), with an occasional river or mountain thrown in. I am wondering if you'd mind me incorporating names of Russian metro stations into the mix. Many of them have quite generic names, shared by other geographic entities. Adding them to dab pages would make them a tad easier to find, which is a definite plus. The downside for you, I assume, is that I rely on WP:RUS heavily, because spelling consistency in such an enormous project is an absolute must, and there is nothing better that WP:RUS available at this point of time. So, if that's going to be a problem, then just ignore my offer—I'm planning to resume working on WP:CYR eventually (even if that means after the hell freezes over), and there is no urgency in this for me. On the other side, if you agree, I'd appreciate a list (or a link to a list) of all Russian metro stations by city, as well as a blank check (or an indulgence :)) for moving/renaming articles to make them fit into existing scheme. Let me know what you think. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Go for it, I have completely backed off from my earlier convictions, and now I am a supporter of only -y, -ye and other points, just leave the double ee, like Novogireevo, as they are, as for everything else...no problem with changes. I can help if you want... --Kuban Cossack 20:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, I much appreciate it. The question I have is whether the station lists in Misplaced Pages are complete as to be sufficient for this project. I guess Moscow is, but what about other cities? If anything is missing, can you help me locate full lists? I also think that former names of renamed stations could be included as well—would you have that information? I don't think I'll need help with boring routine stuff (you seem to be one of very few people who could write actual content in that area, so your time would be better spent there), but I might bug you every now and then if I encounter problematic cases. Again, thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- I give you ru:Станции-тёзки метро, for disambigs...actually in my opinion it be best that we move everything to ...-skaya ("cityname" Metro)--Kuban Cossack 20:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Good, that'll be useful, although my intention is to not only disambiguate between the stations with the same name, but also between the stations and other entities with the same name. As for "-skaya", I was under impression that's how all stations are already done. Are there ones which are done differently? I wouldn't add disambiguators to the names unless it's necessary, because that's what most naming conventions (with the notable exception of US cities) recommend.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Pfff, well the majority of Metro stations outside Moscow Metro have identical tyozkas elsewhere, and it can go up to a half of the stations. So we just started in Category:Kiev Metro stations, Category:Kharkiv Metro stations, Category:Kryvyi Rih Metrotram with that standard... and elsewhere that's how all of the templates are written...--Kuban Cossack 20:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- An abundance of identical names doesn't really scare me; see Oktyabrsky to see what I mean :) Anyway, just wanted to clarify that I intend to limit my activities with Russian stations only. It's kind of hard to do them together with Ukrainian/etc. because it is difficult to organize the workflow efficiently due to different romanization standards of other Slavic languages. Differences in adjective genders are going to keep me busy enough as it is :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 21:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Pfff, well the majority of Metro stations outside Moscow Metro have identical tyozkas elsewhere, and it can go up to a half of the stations. So we just started in Category:Kiev Metro stations, Category:Kharkiv Metro stations, Category:Kryvyi Rih Metrotram with that standard... and elsewhere that's how all of the templates are written...--Kuban Cossack 20:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Good, that'll be useful, although my intention is to not only disambiguate between the stations with the same name, but also between the stations and other entities with the same name. As for "-skaya", I was under impression that's how all stations are already done. Are there ones which are done differently? I wouldn't add disambiguators to the names unless it's necessary, because that's what most naming conventions (with the notable exception of US cities) recommend.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
"That will not due..."
Since you have a "professional level" of English, please tell me what's that supposed to mean... Camptown 21:08, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- This will not do... it is a case when one thinks to write one thing in an edit summary, then changes his mind... and in the end it ends up like a mix of everything... --Kuban Cossack 21:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Photos of Metro stations
Hi, Kuban. I have found that people are forbidden to photograph stations of Saint Petersburg Metro. See my experience on Image talk:Vostok.jpg. Do you know if it is the case with other Metros? It would probably make the images of the stations to be irreplaceable.
С Рождеством! Alex Bakharev 06:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Казачество
Здоровеньки. Английский знаю, но пишу по-русски, поскольку хотелось бы обсудить с вами казачество по-русски, прежде чем здесь присоединяться к дискуссии. Напишите, пожалуйста, какой у вас ник на русской Википедии (дайте ссылку), чтобы я смог задать вопросы там или, если хотите здесь, дайте знать. С уважением, theUg 01:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Metros of the former Soviet Union
See the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Metros of the former Soviet Union proposal here. —dima/s-ko/ 23:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Here is the temporary project page. What do you think? —dima/s-ko/ 01:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry that I didn't answer earlier, as I am busy right now. But good work on the article scheme for the wikiproject! Looks like it will turn out alright without any objections and with its support. —dima/s-ko/ 04:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, I'll try and see who I can get from uk wiki. BTW, take a look at User:DDima/Template, I have created it for an easy metro line navigation template, just include the parameters and have a ready made template! What do you think? —dima/s-ko/ 01:28, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry that I didn't answer earlier, as I am busy right now. But good work on the article scheme for the wikiproject! Looks like it will turn out alright without any objections and with its support. —dima/s-ko/ 04:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Do you think that we should incorporate our wikiproject template into the Trains WikiProject template, so all that we have to do is write {{TrainsWikiProject|class=|subway=yes|metroFSU=yes}}, and so it says at the bottom of the template: This article is mantained by WikiProject Metros of the former Soviet Union. but still has all of the needed cats.. or that we are descendants of the Trains WikiProject? —dima/s-ko/ 17:26, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Better continue the discussion on the project talk page...--Kuban Cossack 14:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Here is the temporary project page. What do you think? —dima/s-ko/ 01:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
Minsk Metro
Hi there! May I ask you why the names of the lines and the stations of the Minsk Metro have been romanized from Russian and not from Belarusian? Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well first of all most places use Russian names over Belarusian, Urbanrail.net, whilst romanising Kharkov and Kiev Metro use Ukrainian translits...however Minsk they give in Russian... Moreover unlike Ukraine which officially tries to eradicate Russian from its society, Belarus allows it to thrive and develop...--Kuban Cossack 18:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- BTW join our wikiproject and lobby others to join...--Kuban Cossack 18:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explanation. The reason I asked is that I needed to know this in order to handle disambiguation pages properly. In this case, would it make sense to move (existing) Avtozavodskaya Line to Avtozavodskaya Line (Minsk Metro) to avoid collision with (yet unwritten) Avtozavodskaya Line (Nizhny Novgorod Metro)? If you were to use Belarusian names, the moves would have to be done in a different manner.
- As for joining the project, I'm afraid I must decline. I hardly know anything about metro, except that it exists in some cities and that I have some limited experience riding it :) My interest in this is merely in paving the road for others by fixing the system of Russian names/disambiguation pages/redirects so that one entity may easily be distinguished from another entity of the same name, and that entities of similar (but not identical) names are properly interlinked and cross-referenced. I do, however, promise that if I see an interested individual, I will let him/her know about the Metro project. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 18:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
This doesn't seem good to me. Even the PA for each station in the Minsk metro is officially bi-lingual, Belarusian on departure, Russian on arrival (or is it other way round?). Personally, I'm pro having the Belarusian-Russian parity in names w/r to the Minsk metro, however, some language must come out as primary here, too. What's there against the Belarusian in that role, clearly marked as such, then? :) Yury Tarasievich 18:42, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Take it up on the Talk:Minsk Metro, I will respond there in a few hours...got my hands full right now...--Kuban Cossack 18:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Your recent request for checkuser
You recently compiled and listed a case at request for checkuser. A checkuser or clerk has asked that you list the code letter which matches with the violations of policy, which is listed at the top of the request for checkuser page. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for checkusers, and is essential for your case to be processed in a timely manner. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is here. Thanks for your co-operation. Daniel.Bryant 20:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC), checkuser clerk.
Could you join discussion of Russian sources on Stomakhin
Hello Alex!
Could you join the discussion of sources on russophobe Boris Stomakhin here http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Boris_Stomakhin#quote_.22Death_to_Russia.22? Please join. Thank you. Vlad fedorov 06:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Nizhny
Because I am going through stations (all stations, in all cities) one by one in alphabetical order, and it takes time (I only started "C" last week). I will fix all NN-metro stations (so there won't by any randomly left out), if you only give me time. If you don't want to wait, or don't want my help with this, I'll gladly apply my time in areas outside of metro (I only volunteered to help because you had no objections a few days ago). Now, can I revert NN-metro, or should I leave all metro-related issues alone for the time being?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- I did not mind you moving stations into disambigs, but what you are doing is changing the whole naming format. For example if some have (Nizhny Novgorod Metro), then why not let others have that for consistency? Same with all of the others. Like I said, my ultimate achival is to have all Moscow Metro stations retitled to -skaya (Moscow Metro). --Kuban Cossack 13:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Because this is not how naming conventions in Misplaced Pages work. We do not pre-disambiguate names. Hence, "Burnakskaya" is sufficient, because there is nothing else by this name; "Burevestnik (Metro)" is sufficient, because there is no other metro station by this name (but there is something else); and "Akademicheskaya (Saint Petersburg Metro)" is necessary because there is a station by this name in Moscow as well. Plus, speaking of consistency, if you pre-disambiguate NN, but not Moscow/St. Petersburg/etc., then where is that said consistency? We don't even have articles for NN/Kazan/etc., so fixing the names early is not only easy, but will ultimately save time later. In case you haven't noticed, I don't just "move the stations to disambigs"; I make a very good effort to make sure all the backlinks point where they should, all redirects work as intended, all disambiguation pages are properly formatted. Not to mention some disambiguation-unrelated cleanup I just can't resist not to take care of. Then come you and with one sweep of a revert undo most of the work, wreaking havoc in all the dependencies.
- Anyway, like I said, if you don't want my help, just let me know. I have plenty of other things to do besides metro.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Which is why I want to move all of the articles in the Moscow and Piter Metros to this standard. I agree there is yet to be consistency, but with redirects and disambigs it will work (see my hidden comment in the first respose)!--Kuban Cossack 14:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- One thing is I still don't understand is why would you want to move a vast number of articles which perfectly comply with Misplaced Pages naming conventions to a naming scheme that is both redundant and non-standard. If you are worried about things to be difficult to find, that's the very reason why I volunteered to help and interlink everything properly. It does take a while, but if you just be patient, all metro stations will fit the grand scheme of things flawlessly.
- The only other major area of Misplaced Pages that is currently using pre-disambiguation is the U.S. cities, but even that is a) because the articles were originally uploaded by a bot; b) it was long ago when naming conventions did not yet develop; c) it is traditional for the U.S. cities to be called with the state disambiguator attached; d) even with all that in mind the necessity of the pre-disambiguation naming scheme is constantly being a subject of hot debates. FSU Metros, on the other hand a) are, for the most part, already named properly; b) do comply with the naming conventions; and c) have stations which are not usually called "a station of Fooysk Metro", but just "a station". Just look at the two sides: doesn't it seem to you that if you proceed with your Moscow (and other metros) moving plan, it'd just be nothing more than "мартышкин труд". I offered to help you because I know how to fix existing (not very numerous) inconsistencies with the stations' names, have vast experience in this kind of work, and believe that it would free your time to actually write content (great job with the Kazan Metro, by the way). From your statements above, however, you seem more interested in wasting time on moving stations around istead of doing something that few other people can do (i.e., write about them).
- Either way, have it your way. Just don't count on my help if you are going to do something that is completely useless, non-compliant with the guidelines, and cannot be interlinked well with other areas of Misplaced Pages. I can return to ignoring metro-related articles just as easily as I've been ignoring them for the past year or so (was romanization the problem then? Who cares now...)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Which is why I want to move all of the articles in the Moscow and Piter Metros to this standard. I agree there is yet to be consistency, but with redirects and disambigs it will work (see my hidden comment in the first respose)!--Kuban Cossack 14:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
By the way, now that the SOVMETRO project is up and running, I think raising the question of naming conventions on the project talk page for everyone to comment would be the best course of action. What would you say?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:27, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well raise it there, and I will answer there.--Kuban Cossack 23:33, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Pridnestrovian Black Sea Cossacks
Hi, could you explain to me (or direct me somewhere this is covered) how these Cossacks relate to the historical Black Sea Cossack Host? I'm involved in editing of several Transnistria-related articles and am looking to learn more about the Cossacks living there. --Illythr 15:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Изображение с ук-вики
Я могу загрузить изображение в commons, но у него качество не очень хорошее, так как я фотографировал на мобильный телефон.--Ahonc (Talk) 16:46, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
Я загрузил 2 фото:
Offer to take pictures
Please take a look at User talk:Asmadeus#Kiev Photo Requests and add your suggestions. --Irpen 01:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Did you know
On 16 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Volga Hydroelectric Station, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
Help
Hey could I get your assistance on the icon page please. At least for consensus? Thanks LoveMonkey 23:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
death camps
Hi. Both death-camps.org and deathcamps.org links are being blacklisted and deleted due to copyright concerns and complaints to the Foundation. I'm one of several people going around disabling these links on a rush basis. I did not touch your archive, but you will want to disable those links before you make any other edits to it. --A. B. 00:02, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
grozny
privjet comrade. just wondering why you have undid my revisions. I am a bureaucrat on the Chechen Misplaced Pages, and the common name now for Grozny is Джохар-ГIала (see Джохар-ГIала. Thanks. :) --Ice201 04:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Grozny 2
I'm afraid I'm not much of an expert when it comes to non-Russian names. However, I do have a few ideas on how to settle this, but I'll need to run a few checks first. I'll do this first thing tomorrow when I get to Misplaced Pages. Meanwhile, please do not revert-war. Both of you are now well beyond the three revert limit. I'm not going to block either of you because you seem to have a discussion going, but don't be surprised if someone else will.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 23:32, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Astana Metro
hey, i started, check out Astana Metro.. first contribution to the SOVMETRO --Ice201 01:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Largest in Europe
See the map, speaks for itself...--Kuban Cossack 10:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)- Read my reply on DDima's talk page. — Alex 10:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- And please, no need to be aggressive. At least three users agree that the guy who proposed the WikiProject phrased everything correctly. — Alex 10:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Ruswelcome
Hi there! When you use {{Ruswelcome}}, please don't forget to substitute it, so things like this don't happen. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:53, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry about that!.--Kuban Cossack 14:59, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
Христосъ Воскресе!
Ура! :) --Irpen
WikiProject
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Ukraine :-) — Alex 04:48, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Russian language in Ukraine
It is very hard to see any digits on your new map. Could you correct it? Please make the digits larger, white color may be better. Russianname 16:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC) Данные по Киеву и Севастополю вообще нечитаемые.Russianname 09:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Terek cossacks
Привет! Кое-что я нашёл и поправил. Alaexis 16:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Arguments
Please do not pounce on the new user so aggressively. Whatever you think of his views, he is polite and considerate (unlike some here), uses talk page instead of running revert wars (unlike some here) and gives suggestions in good faith. This is something totally unlike the sweet pair of editors who run around with endless edit wars and verbal offenses. Civil and willing to contribute and discuss users are always a benefit for the project, unlike trolls and agenda-pushers. Let's make an effort so that they stick around and make contributions. Every person (and every nation) has sensitive spots. Let's avoid touching raw nerves. Regards, --Irpen 09:21, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Chechnya
Russian Territorial integrity is POV because there used to be an independent Republic in Chechnya. Using the sentence "Russians restored their control over the area" is a neutral way, used by historians when describing wars. It simply describes facts without suggesting that one side was the good one. Al-Bargit 14:58, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- The words I insist on using are the most neutral ones. It doesn't matter whether Chechens want independence or not. If you want to discuss military history, it's best to focus on who controlled the area. "Restoring territorial integrity" implies that Russians had the right to control the area, which is POV. In 1900 Lithuania was also part of Russia, now it is independent. If Russia invaded Lithuania now, would you call it "aggresion" or "restoring integrity"? The UN recognized independent Lithuania, but not Chechnya. Were they neutral? I don't think... Al-Bargit 15:36, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
- Have a look at the disambiguation page Ichkeria. It is under attack. The version I keep restoring is by Cdamama (talk · contribs), an Iranian... --Pan Gerwazy 10:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Answer
I'd advise you to return the fact tags. Finding evidence for those statements is possible but not very easy so the fact tags is the best solution there. I'll try to find something to support the statement about southern and eastern Ukrainians. I'm kind of busy now so it'll take some time. Alaexis 19:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Your messages at User talk:Irpen
Next time, feel free to make the announcement at WikiProject Ukraine, everybody will be on the lookout then. :-) — Alex 01:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well are you prepared to take part in disputes and in keeping a leash on some of the trollish elements (two users in particular) in the Ukrainian wiki community of the English wikipedia? --Kuban Cossack 12:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, why not? That's why I told you to leave it on the WikiProject page. — Alex 22:34, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well thank you I shall do so in the future. --Kuban Cossack 22:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sure, why not? That's why I told you to leave it on the WikiProject page. — Alex 22:34, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Image:Gromovb.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gromovb.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Misplaced Pages articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add
{{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 16:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- I looked on the image and I afraid that in the current mood over the fair use pictures it would not survive. The subject is alive, reasonably public, he is not doing something in particular, so we cannot claim the photograph to be a historic image. The photo is not a part of a Promotional package that PR people sometime send to publishers: it is way to low resolution for the polygraphy. Maybe we can contact the attaman and ask for the permissions? This is for a good cause: article about his host and probably about him. He does not plan to sell his pictures, does he? There is some uncertainty about people misusing the photo but AFAIK personality rights are still hold with the GFDL or CC photos, so why not? Alex Bakharev 13:52, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
bronze soldier
Please read WP:USERPAGE and WP:NOT#SOAPBOX. Don't use your user page for polemic, and don't call anyone "fascist pigs" except perhaps the characters of Animal Farm. Thanks, ··coelacan 07:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- First, please extend the same rationale to Image:Chechens ribbon.png and then lecture me on what is appropriate...--Kuban Cossack 12:05, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- I second the exhortation of coelacan. Having disruptive content on your user page may get you blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Sandstein 08:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Would you mind taking a look at this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/Decossackization
It's clearly not the whole story, it's only reference is the Black Book of Communism, and in general, it needs an active and respected editor to revise it.
Thank you.
Hey!
Thought you might find this interesting: . — Alex 07:54, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- http://vagon.metro.ru/passenger/81-7021.html numbers 364, 365, 366, 367, 368 in depot "Obolon'", according to . — Alex 09:29, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Nice trains, although I prefer the austere 81-717/714... they are too symbolic. Right now I have my hands full but in a week's time I will be back...hopefully. --Kuban Cossack 22:52, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- BTW, see this.. a new proposal to start a reconstruction on the above-ground section of the Sviatoshynsko-Brovarska Line. —dima/talk/ 01:54, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Out of question when did you found out? If you had registered onto forum.mymetro.ru , like I am constantly nagging you to, you would have known that the day it was published...Which was quite awhile ago... --Kuban Cossack 15:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- BTW, see this.. a new proposal to start a reconstruction on the above-ground section of the Sviatoshynsko-Brovarska Line. —dima/talk/ 01:54, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Nice trains, although I prefer the austere 81-717/714... they are too symbolic. Right now I have my hands full but in a week's time I will be back...hopefully. --Kuban Cossack 22:52, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Russian-Circassian War
Have you seen this newly promoted FA? It describes "most of the interior of the current territory of Krasnodar Krai" as Circassia. --Ghirla 20:57, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes I know about it, there are even a few medals that lived on from those days that rest in my ... ammm... third cousin's house... I myself am trying to push Kuban Cossacks into FA status so help me and I help you. --Kuban Cossack 22:51, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
9 мая
Привет Тoвáриш!
Пoздpaвляю 9-oгo Мая денъ Пoбeди!
On behalf of all the fighting men and women who took part in the Великая Отечественная война, a salute to ridding Europe from tyranny and oppression and bringing out the most patriotic of spirits amongst people. A small republic as that of the Armenian SSR, contributed to no less than 500,000 men of which half tragically did not return but were memorialized in their efforts from Stalingrad to Berlin including but definitely not limited to the Sassuntsi-Davit Tank Division, the Soviet 89th "Tamanyan" Division and no less than four Armenian Marshals of the Soviet Union including Hamazasp Babadjanyan, Ivan Isakov, Sergei Khudyakov.
We Armenians now have a second reason to celebrate May 9, marking our anniversary of the liberation of Shushi, now in its 15th year.
I hope you enjoy the treat that will greet millions on the main page on May 9, bringing pride to both our nations (no peeking :)). Warmest regards, --MarshallBagramyan 04:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you, pal! Congrats to you too!--Kober 08:22, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
HELP
Hello, my name is Max. Half-Russian Half-Jewish from Israel You dont know me, but i have done the current 8-people Russian people photo and the article Russians in Ukraine. I have also made a photo for Ashkenazi Jews: http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Ashfamo2.JPG
But two people there claimed "its sexist" because it has no wimen, but i judged by contribution not by sex. So they tried to get my picture of by saying there's no licence (But there is) and other lies, and had an edit war against me. Those two now bring many friends there to support there. The root of this war has nothing to do with sexism actually, i just once said to Homo Sapiens he's not the boss so he started this war with many people he has driven their against me. I'm new and have no friends here yet, so i cant bring more people to the Edit-War (I tried to stop it), so i started looking for people who i think will be objective there. I found only three people: Kazak, Murenin C, Lucius 1976, Kuban Kazak, and you four i ask for help (Youre the only intelegent wikipedians i found). There bringing people against me and i'm alone. Now the page is prptected but not for long. The argument is down on the page i will give you, in the "Which Collage?". Please help. heres the link: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Ashkenazi_Jews#Which_collage.3F
M.V.E.i. 16:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
P.S. I think this may interest you, join a greeting: http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Russians#Happy_9th_May
Спасибо
File:Georgian ribbon2.jpg Поздравляю! Alaexis 10:45, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
V-E Day
Happy V-E Day, my friend! -- Aivazovsky 11:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
May 9
¡Feliz Día de la victoria!
Rakela 20:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. Happy Victory day to you and your family. Grandmaster 05:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Please stop edit warring.
Every my edit in Russian language in Ukraine is explained in the comments. If you do not agree, please use tha talk page. Why do you revert without explanation? --AndriyK 19:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Please come to the Ethnic Russians in Ukrain talk page
There are some changes that we aouldn't like to do without hearing you first. M.V.E.i. 19:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Revert war
I was very disappointed when in your revert warring over imperialist terminology along with it you also erased my work on another paragraph. This is counterproductive if not uncivil. Please refrain from destroying other people's work without discussing. Reverting whole articles at whim is not helpful in reaching concensus on certain issues in the text. Let's work issue by issue with mutual respect. So far, I have been observing lack of one from your part. Hope this changes and soon. --Hillock65 20:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- It is you who needs to refrain from revert warring. This is a controversial topic and pushing Ukrainian nationalist sentiment into it does not help. For the sake of consensus one has to make compromises, let's accept on issues and then edit accordingly. For example Little Russian langauge which I can say is not the same as Ukrainian by definition. --Kuban Cossack 20:50, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Also if you are going to recruit supporters, please don't recruit trolls and vandals ref. Recruit User:Tufkaa, User:Faustian or User:Riurik they will most likely support you, but in the process dramatically enrich the article in such a case that it will be mutually acceptable. --Kuban Cossack 21:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- What nationalist agenda am I pushing, by asking you to be respectful and use terminology acceptable in Encyclopedia Brittanica? I notice from your uncivil and baseless accusations that dialogue with you is probably impossible. You are exhibiting extremely bad faith and are obviously itching for confrontation. That will not happen, I am cutting all contacts with you and am looking for other people to mediate. I will no longer respond to your messages and please refrain from posting your threats on my talk page as I will be considering this a form of harassment. --Hillock65 21:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- Harassment? WP:HAR states contrary. I just simply asked you to calm down, also do tell me at what point did I threaten you. If you formal WP:DR process to begin go for it, I will participate, but don't make baseless accusations. Also do keep mind that there is a WP:POINT policy in wikipedia, and you stated your point for the dislike of the term Little Russian many times. (Once is enough btw.) So fine, have it your way but you pulled out of the dispute first not me, remember that. --Kuban Cossack 21:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
- What nationalist agenda am I pushing, by asking you to be respectful and use terminology acceptable in Encyclopedia Brittanica? I notice from your uncivil and baseless accusations that dialogue with you is probably impossible. You are exhibiting extremely bad faith and are obviously itching for confrontation. That will not happen, I am cutting all contacts with you and am looking for other people to mediate. I will no longer respond to your messages and please refrain from posting your threats on my talk page as I will be considering this a form of harassment. --Hillock65 21:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Your revert of Ukrainian language
You reverted the article Ukrainian language without explaining reasons for doing it. Could you please drop a comment on your revert on the article talk?--AndriyK 10:18, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- I would like to remind you, you were asked to explaine the reasons for your revert .--AndriyK 12:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Use the talk page
Please stop revert-warring and act in Good Faith. Otherwise I will make a formal complaint to the admin and ask for the page to be locked, use the talk page prior to doing so. Just because you think I am a bad editor (which I could not really care) that does give you the excuse to continue disruptive behaivour. There is a talk page on the article so please return to discussing. --Kuban Cossack 21:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- I would like to ask you to stop using this article as a provocation purposefully posting insulting terminology absolutely contrary to the cited sources and cite xenophobic references. Your behaviour is in no way conducive to cooperation that is necessary for this article. Please, if you cite sources don't invent things that are not there and please stop the revert war. If you cannot support your statements with sources, don't revert the text just because you don't like it.--Hillock65 21:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- I think the fact that out of your contribution in the last hour you made more than four reverts and only one talk page entry. That really is enough to summarize your behaivour in a nutshell as disruptive. If you want to discuss the article go to the talk page. But for all intents and purposes I am disappointed in you. --Kuban Cossack 21:50, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- And who is talking? How many reverts did you make? Let's see How many does that make? And that is not all. Please respect other users.--Hillock65 22:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I did make some of those reverts, but however after explaining most of them on the talk page. So please, не ищи правду в других коли в тебе ее нету. --Kuban Cossack 22:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Please use English, the use of strange language to insult the opponent is the wrong way to prove your point.--Hillock65 22:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I did make some of those reverts, but however after explaining most of them on the talk page. So please, не ищи правду в других коли в тебе ее нету. --Kuban Cossack 22:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- And who is talking? How many reverts did you make? Let's see How many does that make? And that is not all. Please respect other users.--Hillock65 22:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- I think the fact that out of your contribution in the last hour you made more than four reverts and only one talk page entry. That really is enough to summarize your behaivour in a nutshell as disruptive. If you want to discuss the article go to the talk page. But for all intents and purposes I am disappointed in you. --Kuban Cossack 21:50, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- I would like to ask you to stop using this article as a provocation purposefully posting insulting terminology absolutely contrary to the cited sources and cite xenophobic references. Your behaviour is in no way conducive to cooperation that is necessary for this article. Please, if you cite sources don't invent things that are not there and please stop the revert war. If you cannot support your statements with sources, don't revert the text just because you don't like it.--Hillock65 21:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kuban, since that discussion at my talk page, it appears to me that Andriy has restricted his edits to the article's talk page, and you have continued edit warring, but with Hillock now. I think you both need to stop that, and I'll go ask him to stop now. You've been here for a while, and should be using talk pages and mediation, not just reverting repeatedly. Please try that instead. Dmcdevit·t 05:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)