| Revision as of 16:57, 4 June 2007 view sourceTobias Conradi (talk | contribs)37,615 edits '''This user thinks Misplaced Pages should be more tranparent with respect to admin actions. All users should be allowed to have lists of annotated admin actions, e.g. listings of admin right abuses.'''← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:46, 7 June 2007 view source Tobias Conradi (talk | contribs)37,615 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <small>The orginal version of this page contained admin right abuse listing and was deleted. The deletion is not shown in the deletion log.</small> | |||
| ⚫ | '''This user thinks Misplaced Pages should be more tranparent with respect to admin actions. All users should be allowed to have |
||
| ⚫ | '''This user thinks Misplaced Pages should be more tranparent with respect to admin actions. All users should be allowed to have annotated listings of admin actions, e.g. listings of admin right abuses.''' | ||
| Unfortunatly the ArbCom ruled that "Tobias Conradi is prohibited from maintaining laundry lists of grievances." and referring here to a simple listing of annotated diffs. ] | |||
| ] | |||
| So User:Tobias Conradi is denied the right to collect evidences of admin right abuses. | |||
| It reminds me on people committing crime and when the victim wants to change things by making the crime public he is additionally abused by being censored. | |||
| http://transparency.org | http://transparency.org | ||
| If someone wants to discuss the matter ] | |||
| ;deleted | |||
| *13:15, 6 June 2007 JzG (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Tobias Conradi/2007-05 ArbCom pro censorship ruling" (fol de rol) | |||
| *13:15, 6 June 2007 JzG (Talk | contribs) deleted "User talk:Tobias Conradi/2007-05 ArbCom pro censorship ruling" (fol de rol) ) | |||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
Revision as of 19:46, 7 June 2007
The orginal version of this page contained admin right abuse listing and was deleted. The deletion is not shown in the deletion log.
This user thinks Misplaced Pages should be more tranparent with respect to admin actions. All users should be allowed to have annotated listings of admin actions, e.g. listings of admin right abuses.
Unfortunatly the ArbCom ruled that "Tobias Conradi is prohibited from maintaining laundry lists of grievances." and referring here to a simple listing of annotated diffs. User_talk:Tobias Conradi/RfA
So User:Tobias Conradi is denied the right to collect evidences of admin right abuses.
It reminds me on people committing crime and when the victim wants to change things by making the crime public he is additionally abused by being censored.
If someone wants to discuss the matter User_talk:Tobias_Conradi/2007-05_ArbCom_pro_censorship_ruling
- deleted
- 13:15, 6 June 2007 JzG (Talk | contribs) deleted "User:Tobias Conradi/2007-05 ArbCom pro censorship ruling" (fol de rol)
- 13:15, 6 June 2007 JzG (Talk | contribs) deleted "User talk:Tobias Conradi/2007-05 ArbCom pro censorship ruling" (fol de rol) )
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Tobias Conradi
This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.
- Tobias Conradi may be blocked up to an hour by any administrator for any personal attack or violation of civility.
- Tobias Conradi is limited to one revert per week on any article. This includes moves.
- Tobias Conradi is prohibited from maintaining laundry lists of grievances.
- Should Tobias Conradi violate any ban or prohibition imposed by this decision, he may be blocked by any administrator for up to one hour. Blocks need not be logged.
For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 08:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Seems creating lists with admin right abuses is regarded as maintaining "laundry lists of grievances". This results in an ArbCom decision: Keep admin actions intransparent! Tobias Conradi (Talk) 18:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- "Tobias Conradi is limited to one revert per week on any article. This includes moves."
- does anybody know why?