| Revision as of 20:07, 18 June 2007 editMark Kim (talk | contribs)4,886 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:37, 19 June 2007 edit undoCrossmr (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers18,925 edits CivilityNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| :On an unrelated note: no one needs your permission to watch your talk page, since you don't own it.--] (]) 15:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC) | :On an unrelated note: no one needs your permission to watch your talk page, since you don't own it.--] (]) 15:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Civility == | |||
| In the future please refrain from referring to editors as "untrusted". An editor is by no means considered untrustworthy just because they don't have an account. A minor change such as that didn't warrant such a negative labeling. .--] 14:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:37, 19 June 2007
| This is Mark Kim's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
I prefer clean comments. Please don't watch this page as I consider that to be harassment. The additional rules I have is no name calling and no "wiki-bullying". Thanks.
As of June 17, 2007, heated discussions are no longer archived.
Page last archived by — Mark Kim (U * T/R * CTD) 13:21, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
Notification AN/I
You should be aware that Crossmr (talk · contribs) has requested administrative intervention regarding your past incivility:
You're a valuable contributor usually, but it appears that you're often provoked by others. I was reading what people have said to you people said to you and some of the comments were very upsetting. However, it is very, very important to stay civil in the face of such behaviour. Your opponents can use it against you to ignore and dismiss your arguments.
Regarding this AN/I request that Crossmr posted, don't worry too much about it. You won't be banned or indefinitely blocked just from this, though continuing on this road will lead to more trouble and eventually an indefinite block. Just focus on your future behavior and you'll be fine. –Gunslinger47 18:26, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
- Can you provide any diffs of the comments you find upsetting? I was reviewing this case on AN/I and the diffs provided there by Crossmr only show Mark is very easily provoked. Maybe you would like to tell your side of the story at AN/I.
- On an unrelated note: no one needs your permission to watch your talk page, since you don't own it.--Atlan (talk) 15:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Civility
In the future please refrain from referring to editors as "untrusted". An editor is by no means considered untrustworthy just because they don't have an account. A minor change such as that didn't warrant such a negative labeling. .--Crossmr 14:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)