Misplaced Pages

Prime-counting function: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →
Revision as of 23:26, 6 July 2007 editMichael Hardy (talk | contribs)Administrators210,293 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 23:27, 6 July 2007 edit undoMichael Hardy (talk | contribs)Administrators210,293 editsm moved Prime counting function to Prime-counting function over redirectNext edit →
(No difference)

Revision as of 23:27, 6 July 2007

In mathematics, the prime counting function is the function counting the number of prime numbers less than or equal to some real number x. It is denoted by π ( x ) {\displaystyle \scriptstyle \pi (x)} (this does not refer to the number π).

The 60 first values of π(n)

History

Of great interest in number theory is the growth rate of the prime counting function. It was conjectured in the end of the 18th century by Gauss and by Legendre to be approximately

x / ln ( x ) , {\displaystyle x/\operatorname {ln} (x),\,}

in the sense that

lim x + π ( x ) x / ln ( x ) = 1. {\displaystyle \lim _{x\rightarrow +\infty }{\frac {\pi (x)}{x/\operatorname {ln} (x)}}=1.\,}

This statement is the prime number theorem. An equivalent statement is

lim x + π ( x ) / li ( x ) = 1 , {\displaystyle \lim _{x\rightarrow +\infty }\pi (x)/\operatorname {li} (x)=1,\,}

where li is the logarithmic integral function. This was first proved around 1896 by Hadamard and by de la Vallée Poussin (independently), using properties of the Riemann zeta function introduced by Riemann in 1859.

More precise estimates of π ( x ) {\displaystyle \pi (x)} are now known; for example

π ( x ) = li ( x ) + O ( x exp ( ln ( x ) 15 ) ) , {\displaystyle \pi (x)=\operatorname {li} (x)+O\left(x\exp \left(-{\frac {\sqrt {\ln(x)}}{15}}\right)\right),}

where the O is big O notation. Proofs of the prime number theorem not using the zeta function or complex analysis were found around 1948 by Atle Selberg and by Paul Erdős (for the most part independently).

Another conjecture about the growth rate for prime series involving the prime number theorem is

G ( n , x ) = p x p n π ( x n + 1 ) . {\displaystyle G(n,x)=\sum _{p}^{x}p^{n}\sim \pi (x^{n+1}).}

Table of π(x), x / ln x, and Li(x)

The table shows how the three functions π(x), x / ln x and Li(x) compare at powers of 10.

x π(x) π(x) − x / ln x Li(x) − π(x) x / π(x)
10 4 −0.3 2.2 2.500
10 25 3.3 5.1 4.000
10 168 23 10 5.952
10 1,229 143 17 8.137
10 9,592 906 38 10.425
10 78,498 6,116 130 12.740
10 664,579 44,158 339 15.047
10 5,761,455 332,774 754 17.357
10 50,847,534 2,592,592 1,701 19.667
10 455,052,511 20,758,029 3,104 21.975
10 4,118,054,813 169,923,159 11,588 24.283
10 37,607,912,018 1,416,705,193 38,263 26.590
10 346,065,536,839 11,992,858,452 108,971 28.896
10 3,204,941,750,802 102,838,308,636 314,890 31.202
10 29,844,570,422,669 891,604,962,452 1,052,619 33.507
10 279,238,341,033,925 7,804,289,844,393 3,214,632 35.812
10 2,623,557,157,654,233 68,883,734,693,281 7,956,589 38.116
10 24,739,954,287,740,860 612,483,070,893,536 21,949,555 40.420
10 234,057,667,276,344,607 5,481,624,169,369,960 99,877,775 42.725
10 2,220,819,602,560,918,840 49,347,193,044,659,701 222,744,644 45.028
10 21,127,269,486,018,731,928 446,579,871,578,168,707 597,394,254 47.332
10 201,467,286,689,315,906,290 4,060,704,006,019,620,994 1,932,355,208 49.636
10 1,925,320,391,606,803,968,923 37,083,513,766,578,631,309 7,250,186,216 51.939

The π(x) column is sequence A006880 in OEIS; x / ln x is sequence A057835; and Li(x) is sequence A057752. The value for π(10) is by T. O. e Silva.

Algorithms for evaluating π(x)

A simple way to find π ( x ) {\displaystyle \pi (x)} , if x {\displaystyle x} is not too large, is to use the sieve of Eratosthenes to produce the primes less than or equal to x {\displaystyle x} and then to count them.

A more elaborate way of finding π ( x ) {\displaystyle \pi (x)} is due to Legendre: given x {\displaystyle x} , if p 1 {\displaystyle p_{1}} p 2 {\displaystyle p_{2}} , …,  p k {\displaystyle p_{k}} are distinct prime numbers, then the number of integers less than or equal to x {\displaystyle x} which are divisible by no p i {\displaystyle p_{i}} is

x i x p i + i < j x p i p j i < j < k x p i p j p k + , {\displaystyle \lfloor x\rfloor -\sum _{i}\left\lfloor {\frac {x}{p_{i}}}\right\rfloor +\sum _{i<j}\left\lfloor {\frac {x}{p_{i}p_{j}}}\right\rfloor -\sum _{i<j<k}\left\lfloor {\frac {x}{p_{i}p_{j}p_{k}}}\right\rfloor +\cdots ,}

(where {\displaystyle \lfloor \cdot \rfloor } denotes the floor function). This number is therefore equal to

π ( x ) π ( x ) + 1 {\displaystyle \pi (x)-\pi \left({\sqrt {x}}\right)+1\,}

when the numbers p 1 , p 2 , , p k {\displaystyle p_{1},p_{2},\dots ,p_{k}} are the prime numbers less than or equal to the square root of x {\displaystyle x} .

In a series of articles published between 1870 and 1885, Ernst Meissel described (and used) a practical combinatorial way of evaluating π ( x ) {\displaystyle \pi (x)} . Let p 1 {\displaystyle p_{1}} p 2 {\displaystyle p_{2}} , …,  p n {\displaystyle p_{n}} be the first n {\displaystyle n} primes and denote by Φ ( m , n ) {\displaystyle \Phi (m,n)} the number of natural numbers not greater than m {\displaystyle m} which are divisible by no p i {\displaystyle p_{i}} . Then

Φ ( m , n ) = Φ ( m , n 1 ) Φ ( [ m p n ] , n 1 ) , {\displaystyle \Phi (m,n)=\Phi (m,n-1)-\Phi \left(\left,n-1\right),\,}

Given a natural number m {\displaystyle m} , if n = π ( m 3 ) {\displaystyle n=\pi \left({\sqrt{m}}\right)} and if μ = π ( m ) n {\displaystyle \mu =\pi \left({\sqrt {m}}\right)-n} , then

π ( m ) = Φ ( m , n ) + n ( μ + 1 ) + μ 2 μ 2 1 k = 1 μ π ( m p n + k ) . {\displaystyle \pi (m)=\Phi (m,n)+n(\mu +1)+{\frac {\mu ^{2}-\mu }{2}}-1-\sum _{k=1}^{\mu }\pi \left({\frac {m}{p_{n+k}}}\right).\,}

Using this approach, Meissel computed π ( x ) {\displaystyle \pi (x)} , for x {\displaystyle x} equal to 5×10, 10, 10, and 10.

In 1959, Derrick Henry Lehmer extended and simplified Meissel's method. Define, for real m {\displaystyle m} and for natural numbers n {\displaystyle n} , and k {\displaystyle k} , P k ( m , n ) {\displaystyle P_{k}(m,n)} as the number of numbers not greater than m with exactly k prime factors, all greater than p n {\displaystyle p_{n}} . Furthermore, set P 0 ( m , n ) = 1 {\displaystyle P_{0}(m,n)=1} . Then

Φ ( m , n ) = k = 0 + P k ( m , n ) , {\displaystyle \Phi (m,n)=\sum _{k=0}^{+\infty }P_{k}(m,n),\,}

where the sum actually has only finitely many nonzero terms. Let y {\displaystyle y} denote an integer such that m 3 y m {\displaystyle {\sqrt{m}}\leq y\leq {\sqrt {m}}} , and set n = π ( y ) {\displaystyle n=\pi (y)} . Then P 1 ( m , n ) = π ( m ) n {\displaystyle P_{1}(m,n)=\pi (m)-n} and P k ( m , n ) = 0 {\displaystyle P_{k}(m,n)=0} when k {\displaystyle k}  ≥ 3. Therefore

π ( m ) = Φ ( m , n ) + n 1 P 2 ( m , n ) . {\displaystyle \pi (m)=\Phi (m,n)+n-1-P_{2}(m,n).}

The computation of P 2 ( m , n ) {\displaystyle P_{2}(m,n)} can be obtained this way:

P 2 ( m , n ) = y < p m ( π ( m p ) π ( p ) + 1 ) . {\displaystyle P_{2}(m,n)=\sum _{y<p\leq {\sqrt {m}}}\left(\pi \left({\frac {m}{p}}\right)-\pi (p)+1\right).\,}

On the other hand, the computation of Φ ( m , n ) {\displaystyle \Phi (m,n)} can be done using the following rules:

  1. Φ ( m , 0 ) = m ; {\displaystyle \Phi (m,0)=\lfloor m\rfloor ;\,}
  2. Φ ( m , b ) = Φ ( m , b 1 ) Φ ( m p b , b 1 ) . {\displaystyle \Phi (m,b)=\Phi (m,b-1)-\Phi \left({\frac {m}{p_{b}}},b-1\right).\,}

Using his method and an IBM 701, Lehmer was able to compute π ( 10 10 ) {\displaystyle \pi \left(10^{10}\right)} .

Chinese mathematician Hwang Cheng, in a conference about prime number functions at the University of Bordeaux used the following identities:

e ( a 1 ) Θ f ( x ) = f ( a x ) , {\displaystyle e^{(a-1)\Theta }f(x)=f(ax),\,}
J ( x ) = n = 1 π ( x 1 / n ) n , {\displaystyle J(x)=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {\pi (x^{1/n})}{n}},}

and setting x = e t {\displaystyle x=e^{t}} , Laplace-transforming both sides and applying a geometric sum on e n Θ {\displaystyle e^{n\Theta }} got the expression

1 2 π i c i c + i g ( s ) t s d s = π ( t ) , {\displaystyle {\frac {1}{2{\pi }i}}\int _{c-i\infty }^{c+i\infty }g(s)t^{s}\,ds=\pi (t),}
ln ζ ( s ) s = ( 1 e Θ ( s ) ) 1 g ( s ) {\displaystyle {\frac {\ln \zeta (s)}{s}}=(1-e^{\Theta (s)})^{-1}g(s)}
Θ ( s ) = s d d s . {\displaystyle \Theta (s)=s{\frac {d}{ds}}.}

Other prime counting functions

Other prime counting functions are also used because they are more convenient to work with. One is Riemann's prime counting function, usually denoted as Π 0 ( x ) {\displaystyle \Pi _{0}(x)} . This has jumps of 1/n for prime powers p, with it taking a value half-way between the two sides at discontinuities. That added detail is because then it may be defined by an inverse Mellin transform. Formally, we may define Π 0 ( x ) {\displaystyle \Pi _{0}(x)} by

Π 0 ( x ) = 1 2 ( p n < x 1 n   + p n x 1 n ) {\displaystyle \Pi _{0}(x)={\frac {1}{2}}{\bigg (}\sum _{p^{n}<x}{\frac {1}{n}}\ +\sum _{p^{n}\leq x}{\frac {1}{n}}{\bigg )}}

where p is a prime.

We may also write

Π 0 ( x ) = 2 x Λ ( n ) ln n 1 2 Λ ( x ) ln x = n = 1 1 n π 0 ( x 1 / n ) {\displaystyle \Pi _{0}(x)=\sum _{2}^{x}{\frac {\Lambda (n)}{\ln n}}-{\frac {1}{2}}{\frac {\Lambda (x)}{\ln x}}=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {1}{n}}\pi _{0}(x^{1/n})}

where Λ(n) is the von Mangoldt function and

π 0 ( x ) = π ( x 0 ) + π ( x + 0 ) 2 . {\displaystyle \pi _{0}(x)={\frac {\pi (x-0)+\pi (x+0)}{2}}.}

Möbius inversion formula then gives

π 0 ( x ) = n = 1 μ ( n ) n Π 0 ( x 1 / n ) = 1 d u M ( u ) Π 0 ( x 1 / u ) u 1 {\displaystyle \pi _{0}(x)=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {\mu (n)}{n}}\Pi _{0}(x^{1/n})=\int _{1}^{\infty }duM'(u)\Pi _{0}(x^{1/u})u^{-1}}

where M(u) is the Mertens function.

Knowing the relationship between log of the Riemann zeta function and the von Mangoldt function Λ {\displaystyle \Lambda } , and using the Perron formula we have

ln ζ ( s ) = s 0 Π 0 ( x ) x s + 1 d x {\displaystyle \ln \zeta (s)=s\int _{0}^{\infty }\Pi _{0}(x)x^{-s+1}\,dx}

The Chebyshev function weights primes or prime powers p by ln(p):

θ ( x ) = p x ln p {\displaystyle \theta (x)=\sum _{p\leq x}\ln p}
ψ ( x ) = p n x ln p = n = 1 θ ( x 1 / n ) = n x Λ ( n ) . {\displaystyle \psi (x)=\sum _{p^{n}\leq x}\ln p=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }\theta (x^{1/n})=\sum _{n\leq x}\Lambda (n).}

Formulas for prime counting functions

These come in two kinds, arithmetic formulas and analytic formulas. The latter are what allow us to prove the prime number theorem. They stem from the work of Riemann and von Mangoldt, and are generally known as explicit formulas.

We have the following expression for ψ:

ψ 0 ( x ) = x ρ x ρ ρ ln 2 π 1 2 ln ( 1 x 2 ) {\displaystyle \psi _{0}(x)=x-\sum _{\rho }{\frac {x^{\rho }}{\rho }}-\ln 2\pi -{\frac {1}{2}}\ln(1-x^{-2})}

where ψ 0 ( x ) = ψ ( x 0 ) + ψ ( x + 0 ) 2 {\displaystyle \psi _{0}(x)={\frac {\psi (x-0)+\psi (x+0)}{2}}}

Here ρ are the zeros of the Riemann zeta function in the critical strip, where the real part of ρ is between zero and one. The formula is valid for values of x greater than one, which is the region of interest. The sum over the roots is conditionally convergent, and should be taken in order of increasing absolute value of the imaginary part. Note that the same sum over the trivial roots gives the last subtrahend in the formula.

For Π 0 ( x ) {\displaystyle \Pi _{0}(x)} we have a more complicated formula

Π 0 ( x ) = li ( x ) ρ li ( x ρ ) ln 2 + x d t t ( t 2 1 ) ln t {\displaystyle \Pi _{0}(x)=\operatorname {li} (x)-\sum _{\rho }\operatorname {li} (x^{\rho })-\ln 2+\int _{x}^{\infty }{\frac {dt}{t(t^{2}-1)\ln t}}}

Again, the formula is valid for x > 1, while ρ are the nontrivial zeros of the zeta function ordered according to their absolute value, and, again, the latter integral, taken with minus sign, is just the same sum, but over the trivial zeros. The first term li(x) is the usual logarithmic integral function; the expression li ( x ρ ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {li} (x^{\rho })} in the second term should be considered as Ei ( ρ ln x ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {Ei} (\rho \ln x)} , where Ei is the analytic continuation of the exponential integral function from positive reals to the complex plane with branch cut along the negative reals.

Thus, Möbius inversion formula gives us

π 0 ( x ) = R ( x ) ρ R ( x ρ ) 1 ln x + 1 π arctan π ln x {\displaystyle \pi _{0}(x)=\operatorname {R} (x)-\sum _{\rho }\operatorname {R} (x^{\rho })-{\frac {1}{\ln x}}+{\frac {1}{\pi }}\arctan {\frac {\pi }{\ln x}}}

valid for x > 1, where

R ( x ) = n = 1 μ ( n ) n li ( x 1 / n ) = 1 + k = 1 ( ln x ) k k ! k ζ ( k + 1 ) {\displaystyle \operatorname {R} (x)=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {\mu (n)}{n}}\operatorname {li} (x^{1/n})=1+\sum _{k=1}^{\infty }{\frac {(\ln x)^{k}}{k!k\zeta (k+1)}}}

is so-called Riemann's R-function. The latter series for it is known as Gram series and converges for all positive x.

Delta function (red line) on log scale

The sum over non-trivial zeta zeros in the formula for π 0 ( x ) {\displaystyle \pi _{0}(x)} describes the fluctuations of π 0 ( x ) {\displaystyle \pi _{0}(x)} , while remaining terms give the "smooth" part of prime counting function. The amplitude of the "noisy" part is heuristically about x / ln x {\displaystyle {\sqrt {x}}/\ln x} , so the fluctuations of the distribution of primes can be represented with the Delta function:

Delta ( x ) = ( π 0 ( x ) R ( x ) + 1 ln x 1 π arctan π ln x ) ln x x {\displaystyle \operatorname {Delta} (x)={\bigg (}\pi _{0}(x)-\operatorname {R} (x)+{\frac {1}{\ln x}}-{\frac {1}{\pi }}\arctan {\frac {\pi }{\ln x}}{\bigg )}{\frac {\ln x}{\sqrt {x}}}}


An extensive table of the values of Delta(x), based on the results of Tomás Oliveira e Silva, is available.

Inequalities

Here are some useful inequalities for π(x).

π ( x ) > x log x {\displaystyle \pi (x)>{\frac {x}{\log x}}} for x ≥ 17.
π ( x ) < 1.25506 x log x {\displaystyle \pi (x)<1.25506{\frac {x}{\log x}}} for x > 1.
x log x + 2 < π ( x ) < x log x 4 {\displaystyle {\frac {x}{\log x+2}}<\pi (x)<{\frac {x}{\log x-4}}} for x ≥ 55.

Here are some inequalities for the n prime, pn.

n   ln n + n ln ln n n < p n < n ln n + n ln ln n {\displaystyle n\ \ln n+n\ln \ln n-n<p_{n}<n\ln n+n\ln \ln n} for n ≥ 6.

The left inequality holds for n ≥ 1 and the right inequality holds for n ≥ 6.

An approximation for the n prime number is

p n = n ln n + n ln ln n n + n ln ln n 2 n ln n + O ( n ( ln ln n ) 2 ( ln n ) 2 ) . {\displaystyle p_{n}=n\ln n+n\ln \ln n-n+{\frac {n\ln \ln n-2n}{\ln n}}+O\left({\frac {n(\ln \ln n)^{2}}{(\ln n)^{2}}}\right).}

The Riemann hypothesis

The Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to a much tighter bound on the error in the estimate for π ( x ) {\displaystyle \pi (x)} , and hence to a more regular distribution of prime numbers,

π ( x ) = li ( x ) + O ( x log x ) . {\displaystyle \pi (x)=\operatorname {li} (x)+O({\sqrt {x}}\log {x}).}

Relation to prime sums

if we had a sum of a function over all primes : p f ( x ) {\displaystyle \sum _{p}f(x)} and we wish to accelerate its convergence we can write it as:

n = 1 ( 1 ) n ( π ( n ) π ( n 1 ) + 1 ) f ( n ) = 2 f ( 2 ) p f ( x ) + n = 1 ( 1 ) n f ( n ) {\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }(-1)^{n}(\pi (n)-\pi (n-1)+1)f(n)=2f(2)-\sum _{p}f(x)+\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }(-1)^{n}f(n)}

for the series on the left we could apply Euler transform for alternating series, providing that f(n)>f(n+1) and that the 2 series converges, it also relates an alternating series to its prime sum counterpart, the main task of using this is that we can give a good approximation using only a few values of the prime number counting function.

References

  • Bach, Eric (1996). Algorithmic Number Theory. MIT Press. pp. volume 1 page 234 section 8.8. ISBN 0-262-02405-5. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Dickson, Leonard Eugene (2005). History of the Theory of Numbers I: Divisibility and Primality. Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-44232-2.
  • Ireland, Kenneth (1998). A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory (Second edition ed.). Springer. ISBN 0-387-97329-X. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Hwang H. Cheng Prime Magic conference given at the University of Bordeaux (France) at year 2001 Démarches de la Géométrie et des Nombres de l'Université du Bordeaux
  • Titchmarsh, E. C. The Theory of Functions, 2nd ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1960.
Categories:
Prime-counting function: Difference between revisions Add topic