Misplaced Pages

Carter Page

Good addition to PPNA on the Carter page. Are you satisfied with it's pov as a compromise edition? Jiffypopmetaltop 22:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 20th, 2007.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 9th, 2007.

Special note to spamlist users: Apologies for the formatting issues in previous issues. This only recently became a problem due to a change in HTML Tidy; however, I am to blame on this issue. Sorry, and all messages from this one forward should be fine (I hope!) -Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Personal attack warning

It has been pointed out to me that you have violated Misplaced Pages policies on WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL, especially with this edit . Please refrain from posting any more personal attacks. Doing so could cause you to be blocked. Best, --Alabamaboy 17:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey, "Andyvphil," I'm off my block (so to speak), and I just wanted you to know that "Alabamaboy" issued that reprimand without my consent. I had made this complaint to "Jehochman" in My Talk page: Lastly, how is it that others are free to insult me (including calling me "shit for brains"), to demonstrably misrepresent and outright lie about things I posted, to threaten me with "Loss of Privacy", to make hostile edits and redactions, and to basically attack and be uncivil to me as all heck and not be called on it? Is there a secret handshake I'm missing or such?

Of course that was not responded to (Misplaced Pages seems to have an awful lot of people who only make statements and never answer), and only the naughty word got anybody's attention, but I defended you with a later comment that went at least he, alone of all the right wingers and despite numerous insults on his part, actually was genuinely curious about my links regarding the true state of 70's office tech and showing issues with the forgery claims. All the others have insulted me pretty regularly -- their only difference is that they've so far avoided using naughty words, and have shown no interest or curiousity whatsoever about anything not supportive of the forgery charges.

And it's true -- the others were sniping maliciously out of what appears now to have been a political agenda (connections to LGF at least) and had no desire whatsoever to discuss anything -- just block & suppress. Although things got acrimonious between us, you were indeed the only one actually curious and actually "discussing" things in some manner.

I wasn't entirely idle during my block, so some stuff is already happening, but I made it quite clear that you were likely the only straight shooter of the bunch (not that you ever quite hit your target...) FYI. Callmebc 17:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

WP:NPA

Unfounded, bizarre accusations like this will be considered as personal attacks and will be removed. Please refrain from attacking the author rather than discussing content. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 16:18, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

My attempts to discuss JOG's behavior with him have been deleted from his user talk. I now think that it is reasonable to begin a request for arbitration and I am interested to know if you wish to participate. I believe that there is sufficient evidence and precedence () for action to be taken. I plan to request that he be blocked from editing pet food recall-related articles and that his administrator privileges be reviewed. Let me know if you are interested in helping. Jfwambaugh 14:13, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 16th, 2007.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

restored 1

(3) -- well, the current version isn't a bad compromise; having only just gotten this alleged "majority view" out of the lead, keeping A&M somewhere near the top isn't bad. I don't feel this is criticism per se. I don't like the idea of leading off with a quote farm -- sooner or later someone will want to alphabetize them and then find a white supremacist baby killer named "Aaron Aarvark" etc. and it'll just get messy. (2) eh... there's been edit warring over this before -- does a rebuttable to Tutu belong immmediately after Tutu or in the criticism section? -- I do prefer the latter but you'll just have to fight your own battle here. -- Kendrick7 22:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

See my comment about criticism section on talk page.--Urthogie 22:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

The paragraphs of A&M that were sent to the bottom of the article in Other Views was everything following the first paragraph there, which any number of pro-Israeli editors didn't like. I have no idea why. I restored it in part or in whole several times. -- Kendrick7 01:42, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Protected page

There's a bot that does that, as far as I know. Regardless, the issues don't seem to have been worked on on the Talk: page; a specific individual seems to edit Misplaced Pages solely for the purpose of edit-warring on this and 3 other articles. He doesn't appear to like to use the Talk: pages, but he regularly agitates to have pages unprotected so that he can start edit-warring again. As a result, I don't think the parties are ready for unprotection. Jayjg 23:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 23rd, 2007.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:24, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

RfAR Notice regarding the Killian Documents dispute

Hi. You have been included as a party in a request for arbitration involving the Killian memos dispute. FYI. -BC aka Callmebc 00:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

straw poll

Hey Andy. Please share your thoughts at Talk:Allegations_of_Israeli_apartheid#A_quick_straw_poll. Thanks, --Urthogie 14:38, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

frontpagemag

Is there a chance the problem is somewhere on your end? http://www.frontpagemag.com/ works fine from my connection. -Will Beback · † · 04:28, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Sometimes procrastination is a good thing when writing an encyclopedia. I often find that that if I wait long enough to add a fact it either gets added by someone else or turns out to be wrong. Either way my work is done for me. Cheers, -Will Beback · † · 07:57, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Arab sources for apartheid accusation

I noticed your comments on the Allegations of Israeli apartheid talk page and thought I might direct you to potential sources at the Hafrada (Separation) page that make that claim. Specifically, there is a Palestinian reverend in Jerusalem named Naim Ateek who heads the ecumenical organization Sabeel, and a former Yale professor, Mazin B. Qumsiyeh, who both claim that Israel's policies vis-a-vis the Palestinians amount to apartheid. Tiamut 13:03, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

I copied above to Allegations of Israeli apartheid talk page. Andyvphil 13:36, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for April 30th, 2007.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:06, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

"Political Forgery"

I'm still not getting involved with the Killian page (aside from reverting what Deaniack vandal did) until some lingering other issues are dealt with, but "Political Forgery" has as much business being there as "Government Hoax" does on the moon landing and you know it. But I'll bring it up on the discussion page like a good doobie when I get back to business. -BC aka Callmebc 23:17, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

PS: -BC aka Callmebc 01:18, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 7th, 2007.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 14th, 2007.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:55, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Palestine

Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:11, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:20, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:23, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on John Stossel. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Croctotheface 23:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

John Stossel

Please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 23:41, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 20:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Do not insert personal attacks again. You want to discuss it, I will discuss the matter with you here. I have no wish to have an adversarial relationship with you, but you simply can't attack other users and then restore those attacks when they are removed. Barring the restoration of your attacks, I am open to exploring whatever may resolve this issue. Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 21:04, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

If you are unwilling to continue our discussion, that is fine, but linking to your personal attacks are just as inappropriate as restoring them was. Why play these little games? What possible point is there? Attacks are inappropriate and prohibited, period. Gamaliel (Orwellian Cyber hell master) 02:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)