| Revision as of 00:12, 12 July 2007 editAntelan (talk | contribs)4,688 edits Between us← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:21, 19 July 2007 edit undoDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 edits allopathic medicine and afd.Next edit → | ||
| Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
| OsteopathicFreak, I want to apologize for jumping to conclusions about many of your edits. I'm involved in the ArbCom proceedings regarding ], which have left me doubting the intentions of people who make contentious edits. (Not to imply that you make any more contentious edits than any of the rest of us - I just came across your new articles before they were able to mature.) I failed to ], stemming in part from my frustration during the ArbCom with regards to editors who refuse to be willing to have an open and productive discussion. Because I failed to assume good faith, I apologize. I do want to let you know that, at the very least, I brought the AfD sincerely (believing that its salvageable material could fit into an allo or osteo article), but after combing over it (and seeing your improvements, too) I agree that it will end up being a long and useful article in itself. Regards, <font color="red">]</font><font color="blue">]</font> <sup><font color="darkred">]</font></sup> 00:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC) | OsteopathicFreak, I want to apologize for jumping to conclusions about many of your edits. I'm involved in the ArbCom proceedings regarding ], which have left me doubting the intentions of people who make contentious edits. (Not to imply that you make any more contentious edits than any of the rest of us - I just came across your new articles before they were able to mature.) I failed to ], stemming in part from my frustration during the ArbCom with regards to editors who refuse to be willing to have an open and productive discussion. Because I failed to assume good faith, I apologize. I do want to let you know that, at the very least, I brought the AfD sincerely (believing that its salvageable material could fit into an allo or osteo article), but after combing over it (and seeing your improvements, too) I agree that it will end up being a long and useful article in itself. Regards, <font color="red">]</font><font color="blue">]</font> <sup><font color="darkred">]</font></sup> 00:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==allopathic medicine== | |||
| I have reverted to the version passed at AfD. The version you had before that would not have passed afd. It's that simple. Do not change back again. I suggest you put the remainder of the other content into an article by its own, if you think it will be acceptable. ''']''' (]) 05:21, 19 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:21, 19 July 2007
LGBT WikiProject newsletter
| The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter - SPECIAL ELECTION EDITION | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
forgot the project welcome
 Hi, Hopping, welcome to WikiProject LGBT Studies! We are a growing community of Misplaced Pages editors dedicated to identifying, categorizing, and improving articles of interest to the LGBT community. Some points that may be helpful:
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! |
Hopefully this helps you get acquainted with the project. You may also want WP:ARCHIVE info, since I'm flooding your page (I'll stop now =) ··coelacan 04:28, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
Category:Sexual Orientation and medicine
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Sexual Orientation and medicine, by Joie de Vivre, another Misplaced Pages user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Sexual Orientation and medicine fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Sexual Orientation and medicine, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Category:Sexual Orientation and medicine itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:59, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
National Coalition for LGBT Health
A tag has been placed on National Coalition for LGBT Health, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Misplaced Pages:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 20:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Whitman-Walker Clinic
A tag has been placed on Whitman-Walker Clinic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Misplaced Pages:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 20:30, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with National Coalition for LGBT Health. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ~EnviroboyContribs - 20:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
| The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Delivered on 16:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC). SatyrBot 16:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
James W. Holsinger
Hi - that's not how you move pages. You've lost the edit history so it looks like you wrote the entire article from scratch. I've repaired it.
We need to discuss on the talk page whether we should move it or not - and then move it using the tab so that the edit history is kept. Secretlondon 20:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:IMG 0945.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:IMG 0945.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. 08:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Category:Medical schools in California
I am currently going through Category:Medical education and found that you recently created Category:Medical schools in California. Do you think this is really necessary? No other states have a category for their medical schools. Most medical school articles are in Category:Schools of medicine in the United States and "Universities and colleges in (state)". If you don't mind, I would like to either delete the category - or at least remove it from Category:Schools of medicine in the United States. All of the US medical schools should be directly in that category. --Scott Alter 21:11, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Allopathic/Osteopathic medicine
With the changes you made, the Allopathic medicine article is now getting to be really about the medicine, more than the term itself - so I don't mind "Allopathic medicine" as the title. I just wanted the allopathic articles to parallel the osteopathic articles. After going through the Osteopathy article, it seems to describe osteopathic medicine just as well as it does non-US osteopathy. Do you think it would be good to rename "Osteopathy" to "Osteopathic medicine"? (The old "Osteopathic medicine" is now "Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine".) With Osteopathy renamed to Osteopathic medicine, all of the articles will actually be accurately described by the titles.
I think a comparison between the various types of medicine is needed, but it should probably have its own article. I don't think the comparison should be solely on the allopathic or osteopathic page. Maybe something like "Comparison of types of medicine"? Also, I'm sure that people from non-physician camps (naturopathic, homeopathic, etc.) would want some representation too. With a comparison/list page, all types of medicine can be added. --Scott Alter 02:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
{{Omed-stub}}
Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Misplaced Pages:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Misplaced Pages, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 01:51, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Visceral manipulation
Hi OsteopathicFreak, please note that your recent creation, Visceral manipulation, has been flagged by me for speedy deletion. It will soon be deleted by an administrator.
- If you believe you can salvage the article, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag. Instead, you can add a {{hangon}} tag at the top of the page after the {{db-nocontent}} tag in order to alert administrators who may be about to delete it!
- You can contact me about this by posting a comment on my talk page. I will reply as soon as is physically possible.
Thanks! The post in front was made by Popexvi 21:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hello again. Avoid this issue by completing articles before creating. The post in front was made by Popexvi 21:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
Balanced ligamentous tension
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Balanced ligamentous tension, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
similar problems Please check other articles to make sure they have some real content. DGG (talk) 04:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/History of the relationship of osteopathic and allopathic medicine in the United States
Since you are the creator of this article, I'm posting here to let you know that I'm nominating History of the relationship of osteopathic and allopathic medicine in the United States for deletion - here. Antelan 20:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
| The LGBT studies WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||
Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC).
Between us
OsteopathicFreak, I want to apologize for jumping to conclusions about many of your edits. I'm involved in the ArbCom proceedings regarding Parapsychology, which have left me doubting the intentions of people who make contentious edits. (Not to imply that you make any more contentious edits than any of the rest of us - I just came across your new articles before they were able to mature.) I failed to WP:AGF, stemming in part from my frustration during the ArbCom with regards to editors who refuse to be willing to have an open and productive discussion. Because I failed to assume good faith, I apologize. I do want to let you know that, at the very least, I brought the AfD sincerely (believing that its salvageable material could fit into an allo or osteo article), but after combing over it (and seeing your improvements, too) I agree that it will end up being a long and useful article in itself. Regards, Antelan 00:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
allopathic medicine
I have reverted to the version passed at AfD. The version you had before that would not have passed afd. It's that simple. Do not change back again. I suggest you put the remainder of the other content into an article by its own, if you think it will be acceptable. DGG (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2007 (UTC)