Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 22:30, 24 July 2007

Archives and sandboxes

• * Articles
• * Awards received
• * Dreadstar's Archives
• * Dreadstar's Sandboxes

Syzygy Darklock

I wanted to let you know why I'm reverting your change, since you explained your reason for the change so well. I agree it might seem redundant to mention the the word "fictional" so many times, but that is the standard that the Comic Book Project uses. I believe the reason behind it is to help stress that the subject is fictional. Too many articles portray their fictional subject as a real person, leading to confusion to the casual reader (just check out the majority of the Star Wars character articles).

BTW, I gather by your screen name that you might be a Dreadstar fan. Do you happen to have any knowledge of what issue Syzygy was first introduced? I tried hunting for that info on the internet, but came up snake eyes. Thanks for your help! Konczewski 13:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, it is a bit redundant. I may move towards not using fictional in the first sentence of the article (after all, aren't just about all comic book characters fictional?) and save it for the heading. I just like that phrase, "Fictional character biography." Oh, I made some changes on the Vanth Dreadstar article. Let me know what you think. Konczewski 18:49, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

To be honest, I haven't read much of the discussion. I just looked at some sample Feature Articles and Good Articles and did what they did. Konczewski 19:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Batman and Plastic Man are both good examples. They use the redundant phrasing, but they can probably get away with it because the articles are so long. Konczewski 19:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I don't want to be responsible for a Wikideath. Please change it if you like. Thanks for the pleasant conversation. Konczewski 20:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

The Price (graphic novel)

Pretty good. I made a few changes, nothing that affects the body of work. I'm not sure need the See also section if you have wikilinks within the body of the article. Do you have publication dates? That should be a section, and should cover both the original appearance and the date of the trade paperback. And I think you can use the comic book title infobox at the top; I checked some other graphic novel entries, and that's what they do. Konczewski 00:57, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Impressive work, but I do have a few comments. The summary probably needs to be shorter, not longer; I wouldn't be surprised if some dilligent Wikipedian doesn't slap a "over long summary" tag on it soon. Second, yes, that is a run on sentence. It should be split into two; one about the b/w vs color, and a second about the plot summary. Lastly, it really needs a section on publication history. All that would be is details on the original Epic Illustrated run (issue nos. and dates) and then info on the graphic novel publication. That's probably the best place to mention the details on when it was in b/w and when it was in color. On the "See Also" section--are Willow and Dreadstar in this story? From your summary it sounds like a Syzygy standalone story. That should be made explicit in the article, probably in the intro paragraph.

I encourage you to consider improving the "Metamorphosis Odyssey" article, but it definitely needs to get away from the "fannish" tone I see currently, and should really include issue citations.

A Wikipedian I've found useful to consult is User:Tenebrae; he's very active in the comics project, and probably wouldn't mind giving your articles the once over. If I can help with anything else, please let me know. Konczewski 01:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

3RR

There are no hard and fast rules. A year is certainly too long. In your specific axample, the editor who is acting against the version approved by consensus and mediation would probably be viewed as disruptive, particularly if it can be demonstrated that they are knowingly reverting to a deprecated version. If it was clear from the page history that the editor is aware that they are reverting to a version from a few days ago, then I personally would count that as a revert. DrKiernan 07:11, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Wilson

I reverted Wilson because frankly he probably belongs on a list of American illustrators. I've never heard of him and he isn't well known as an American painter or sculptor. I'm leaving him there for now. Why do you have him being born in 1928? Modernist 22:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Check out 1919 or 1918 Modernist 22:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Check this list out: List of illustrators, he might belong there. Modernist 22:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I stand corrected, we'll let him be on both lists. You know he sounds like he is well known in certain circles, thats interesting to me...Thanks, Modernist 23:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

It would benefit from an example or two of his work, under fair use, or better still if GFDL release could be obtained. Tyrenius 23:16, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

You know I am truly amazed that the director of the Met and people at the Smithsonian told you all that about Wilson. Very impressive. Modernist 23:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I see you have a new name, actually I like it better then the old name. I googled Wilson, he seems to be a solid Oklahoma Cowboy artist. I like hearing about new people, I might've missed. Modernist 00:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you, and glad I could help. :-) SlimVirgin 02:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the excellent work on What the Bleep page. 61.68.149.210 07:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Gahhh

Actually I (initially) screwed up the post on his talkpage pretty badly, referring to the report below his and saying another editor had filed it - it's late/early where I am so I'm tired. I am not an administrator right now, but after having to wait several days to get a response to a 3RR report I filed I'm thinking there needs to be someone who actively deals with the backlog so maybe I'll self-nominate. Regards, Perspicacite 10:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Miss New Jersey's Outstanding Teen

Just to let you know that I've dealt with this situation: the content belonged in the Miss America's Outstanding Teen state pageants article and I have moved it there. Btw the pageant is associated with Miss New Jersey and not Miss New Jersey USA. I have prodded the NJ Outstanding Teen article because it is no longer needed, and explained this to the article's author. PageantUpdater 02:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Hey thanks for addressing that merge! I knew it should probably go elsewhere...and just took the queue for the destination from the teen page. I'm a pageant-newbie, so excuse my misdirection on that puppy! Thanks much! Dreadstar † 02:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Would it be better to redirect Miss New Jersey's Outstanding Teen, rather than deleting it? Dreadstar † 02:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Good idea. Will do so myself. In fact, it may be worth redirecting the rest of them as well. Good teamwork sorting this one out... hadn't thought of redirecting :) Btw the State Pageants article itself is up for afd but judging from the discussion it's fairly likely to be kept... should be closing in the next couple of days. PageantUpdater 02:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Excellent! Misplaced Pages at it's best! Two editors working together as a team to make things better! I'll take a look a the AfD, and perhaps weigh in. Anytime you need help with anything, I'm always glad to assist a positive editor like yourself! Nice meeting you! Dreadstar † 02:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Fantastic!

"Holy cannoli"? I actually laughed out loud when I read that! Haven't heard that phrase in years...I love it! You have a great sense of humor. I put in for an admin coach and saw that you edited the page, so out of curiosity I thought I'd drop by and check out your user pages. Lovely pictures and wonderful attitude. If you ever have a coachee slot available...I'd love to. It was the Holy Cannoli that got me...thanks for the smile! Dreadstar † 09:05, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I'll be your coach, no problem! I have 2 coachees right now, but they're pretty much inactive, so I'm open for another. Create a coaching page and we can get started. :) --Fang Aili 17:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Skeptic

"Content of the article must be in relation to the movie itself, so essentially, we need to find sources that mention the movie itself - which your link to eskeptic does! Excellent! Not sure if that site is a reliable source, but you're definitely on the right track! -Dreadstar-"

Pardon me for chuckling but if Micheal Shermer's page isn't a reliable source, I don't know what would be. You could always ask our boss ;) I imagine they've met. Prepare to be entertained. Kevinpedia 19:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

BTW- I haven't requested permission to use that content. How do I do that. E-mail them and then does wiki need a verification its been ok'd? Kevinpedia 19:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Excellent question! I would suggest reading WP:FIVE, WP:RS and WP:CITE and the main articles they link to. We want to avoid copyright violations and plagiarism, by using only acceptable portions of other works. Read over Misplaced Pages:Copyrights for information on images and other copyrighted items. There is a process for contacting a copyright holder and getting permission for use in Wikipeda.

Let me know if you need more info or assistance! I'm always happy to help out! Dreadstar † 20:14, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks! --Nealparr 02:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Your note

You're welcome, and thank you. :-) SlimVirgin 19:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Bleep

Thanks for the nod of approval on my edit - I noticed there seems to have been a lot of recent controversy over at that article. I just finished watching the extended "Quantum Edition", and wanted to add a few things, but I also don't want to stir the pot... maybe I'll hold off for a bit. Cheers.--Jackbirdsong 08:26, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD link

okay, thanks, i guess i understand tnow? Smith Jones

Dear Dreadstar!

Smile a little, smile a little, all along the road; Every life must have its burden, every heart its load. Why sit down in gloom and darkness with your grief to sup? As you drink Fate's bitter tonic, smile across the cup. Smile upon the troubled pilgrims whom you pass and meet; Frowns are thorns, and smiles are blossoms, oft for weary feet. Do not make the way seem harder by a sullen face; Smile a little, smile a little, brighten up the place. Smile upon your undone labour; not for one who grieves O'er his task waits wealth or glory; he who smiles achieves. Though you meet with loss and sorrow in the passing years, Smile a little, smile a little... even through your tears! Ella Wheeler Wilcox Have a beautiful day, dear friend! ;) Love Phaedriel 10:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Well done

HI, Dreadstar. Really appreciate the work you did in making the What the Bleep article more neutral. Thanks for your dedication to Misplaced Pages. TimidGuy 11:41, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For expert Bleep OR removal, effective editing, and gracious collaboration with opposing editors. TimidGuy 21:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Why thank you, kind sir! This kind of compliment really makes the effort even more worthwhile!! – Dreadstar † 21:29, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Dreadstar! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. 22:30, 24 July 2007 (UTC)