Misplaced Pages

Template talk:Los Angeles Angels roster navbox: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:41, 3 August 2007 edit201.67.128.170 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 04:08, 4 August 2007 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits Players to include in table: ReplyNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:


* And if we change it to the ]? I think your (and mine too) problems will be solved. ] 01:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC) * And if we change it to the ]? I think your (and mine too) problems will be solved. ] 01:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

::There is a bit of precedence for having two separate templates: one for the 25 man roster and one for the 40 man roster. For example, ] and ] are set up that way. Actually, very few teams have two templates. If there is consensus to merge it, I'll merge it. -- ] 04:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:08, 4 August 2007

Players to include in table

It didn't see very clear to me exactly which players to include in the table or not, so I decided to be bold and change it so that only the managers, players on the active roster, and players on the 15-day DL are listed. -- Gogo Dodo 23:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

There is a bit of precedence for having two separate templates: one for the 25 man roster and one for the 40 man roster. For example, Chicago White Sox and New York Yankees are set up that way. Actually, very few teams have two templates. If there is consensus to merge it, I'll merge it. -- Gogo Dodo 04:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)