| Revision as of 11:01, 4 August 2007 editJoshii (talk | contribs)3,985 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 79.73.239.0 identified as vandalism to last revision by Jackrm. using TW← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:24, 4 August 2007 edit undo79.73.139.8 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| == UK's third city == | == UK's third city == | ||
| The editor in question has been IP address hopping all night prefixing any mention of Manchester with the phrase "the UK's third city". This started as an edit war the editor is having with a number of people on the article ] over a single sentence noting that some people today consider Manchester to have supplanted Birmingham as the UK's second city. ] 03:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC) | The editor in question has been IP address hopping all night prefixing any mention of Manchester with the phrase "the UK's third city". This started as an edit war the editor is having with a number of people on the article ] the UK's third city over a single sentence noting that some people today consider Manchester to have supplanted Birmingham as the UK's second city. ] 03:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :I thought he meant this, but has any concencus been agreed on this or is there any proof? It's also difficult to tell what is meant simply by ",..the UK's third city". Thanks for informing me of this, and if there is any further discussion on "UK's third city", please tell me so I can get involved. Thanks -] ] 03:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC) | :I thought he meant this, but has any concencus been agreed on this or is there any proof? It's also difficult to tell what is meant simply by ",..the UK's third city". Thanks for informing me of this, and if there is any further discussion on "UK's third city", please tell me so I can get involved. Thanks -] ] 03:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:24, 4 August 2007
| Talk Page Archive |
Re:Coheed and Cambria
I thank you for the invitation, but what I was really doing on that article was reverting vandalism. I enjoy reverting vandalism. Thanks anyway. Savie Kumara 03:53, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Alright, happy reverting! JacќяМ ¿Qué? 03:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Weekly Notification
Just a super quick note, Misplaced Pages Weekly Episode 21 is out and can be downloaded at the usual places (if you've forgotten, WikipediaWeekly.com works wonders. -- Tawkerbot 01:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 31 | 30 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:03, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
UK's third city
The editor in question has been IP address hopping all night prefixing any mention of Manchester with the phrase "the UK's third city". This started as an edit war the editor is having with a number of people on the article Manchester the UK's third city over a single sentence noting that some people today consider Manchester to have supplanted Birmingham as the UK's second city. Pit-yacker 03:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- I thought he meant this, but has any concencus been agreed on this or is there any proof? It's also difficult to tell what is meant simply by ",..the UK's third city". Thanks for informing me of this, and if there is any further discussion on "UK's third city", please tell me so I can get involved. Thanks -JacќяМ ¿Qué? 03:47, 4 August 2007 (UTC)