| Revision as of 00:26, 1 August 2007 editKurykh (talk | contribs)Administrators41,209 edits →[]: close as speedy close← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:47, 6 August 2007 edit undoCalton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users78,494 edits reopening AFD to deal with unilateral undeletionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''speedy close'''. Already deleted by ]. —''']''' 00:26, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 9: | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nomination. The main article doesn't need a long section at all. As I've stated many times: condense the section instead of just splitting it into a massive list that grows into a cluttered mess with no signs of clean up. ] 22:25, 29 July 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nomination. The main article doesn't need a long section at all. As I've stated many times: condense the section instead of just splitting it into a massive list that grows into a cluttered mess with no signs of clean up. ] 22:25, 29 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' ]. ] (]) 23:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' ]. ] (]) 23:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. |
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. | ||
Revision as of 04:47, 6 August 2007
Infinite monkey theorem in popular culture
- Infinite monkey theorem in popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Trivia list that does little but mention a bunch of times the idea has been featured in jokes. --Eyrian 14:53, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - pop culture references list with little context and few sources --Miskwito 17:03, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The user who contested the prod in May recanted and this should have been removed then. The first post-1928 instance of its use could be accomodated on the main article page.Canuckle 17:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Facts can be covered appropriately by lists, topics cannot. Golfcam 23:56, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep The article infinite monkey theorem is too large to include this spinoff. Interestingly, there aren't many other ways to illustrate the concept besides these references. Obviously, there are no real-life examples (other than, perhaps, Misplaced Pages itself) of a lot of monkeys pounding away on keyboards until something intelligent can be produced. :) Mandsford 13:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. The main article doesn't need a long section at all. As I've stated many times: condense the section instead of just splitting it into a massive list that grows into a cluttered mess with no signs of clean up. RobJ1981 22:25, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete WP:TRIVIA. IPSOS (talk) 23:21, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.