Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 16:30, 20 August 2007

Archives Note: The links below are permanent links to the correct versions of the archived talk pages. Any "newer" versions of these pages may have been compromised.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Edits by User:74.200.200.76

Can I ask why you removed the warnings? this person is vandalizing the MGM Grand Detroit and in addition they have now violated the 3RR. If you are an Admin I request that you take appropriate action. 151.198.131.131 15:17, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Microlistics

I'll deal with it if I can, but inappropriate usernames go to WP:UAA. Daniel Case 03:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi

I noticed you made an AIV report on a suspected sockpuppet. If you want to report a sock go here. Thanks! SLSB talk ER 14:58, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

ARBCOM

I noticed you mentioned me in your request for arbitration. You might also like to look at my block log (the blocks made on me not by me). Viridae 05:52, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

AIV

I just changed the template you used to report an IP vandal at WP:AIV from {{userlinks}} to {{ipvandal}}. This gives info to the admins more relevant to an IP. Cheers, Flyguy649 _contribs 16:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Jeffrey O. Gustafson

Hello,

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Jeffrey O. Gustafson. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Jeffrey O. Gustafson/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Jeffrey O. Gustafson/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Cbrown1023 talk 22:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD closures

Please remember to add the Oldafdfull template to article talk pages if you have closed the debate, please see the template for its syntax, regards. — Rlest (formerly Qst) 19:12, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

İQTElif

Thanks for the heads up - I thought I had deleted it, which I had but only once, I needed to delete it again. I thought about a block, but it looks like he recreated the article before the final warning was issued, so it seemed unfair to do so. Carlossuarez46 19:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

re User:Volosian report at WP:AIV

I am removing the above report, without prejudice to further reporting, as the entire Joseph Stalin article looks as if it needs admin intervention. I have noted this at WP:AN/I. I feel Volosians edits were in counter to some severely biased editing of the article (even if they were of themselves bordering on vandalism). If you wish to take the sockpuppetry report to the appropriate place then please do. Thanks. LessHeard vanU 23:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Shaftesbury link

I've just reverted your link addition. John, please - in the interests of fairness, I'd like to see further discussion about this on the talk page. It's a contentious issue and my removing page prot is not an endorsement of this link - Alison ☺ 00:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

I would ask that you not remove this link unless you have a specific objection to its inclusion. Per Help:Reverting, reverting a good-faith edit should not be done lightly; at a bare minimum, this would seem to imply that one should not revert a good faith edit when one does not actually disagree with its content, merely for reasons of fairness or process. John254 01:14, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

thank you John for restoring the link to our town website, I can see why Joe D got upset but it was nothing to do with me I just want our town page to have a link to our community website, maybe now he will give it a rest and realise its one harmless, but relevant, link. Its nice to know there are people willing to stick up for the little guy in the interest of fairness, its very much appreciated. --Curuxz 17:33, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your comment

Thank you for your comment on my RfA, which was successful. Lyrl _C 01:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

CSN

I didn't move your comment as such. I just did a clumsy fix for an edit conflict. You, however, changed the indentation level of my comment, changing who it looked like I was responding to. Please don't do that. Mark Chovain 03:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

I would just like to say thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. Thanks! ChipChamp 03:51, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Pics

There so confusing to put on! there is no upload file button, but Help says there is one, could ya help me?

--MasterChief3 14:58, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

blocking

Oh, I didn’t know...shows how much of a newbie I am....but what are the qualifications of becoming a sysop? Are you a sys op? Sorry, I thought Misplaced Pages was a self policing set up for experienced users but I guess not, Thanks for the info.--Daven200520 18:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Generally, users become sysops after making a successful application at Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship. While there are no formal criteria for adminship, a successful request for adminship generally requires that the candidate has:

(1) at least several thousand edits

(2) some significant participation in the creation of encyclopedic content, the Misplaced Pages namespace, and RC Patrol

(3) not engaged in recent, significant policy violations or other disruption

(4) avoided recent participation in significant disputes or other controversy with other good-faith users.

At the moment, I am not a sysop. John254 19:21, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

RfA link

Have you got something in the works? I was going to request a courtesy blank soon, which would break any links, but if you have something worthwhile in mind, I can hold off on that. - Crockspot 16:30, 20 August 2007 (UTC)