Misplaced Pages

Stalin's speech of 19 August 1939: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:15, 26 August 2007 editStopar~enwiki (talk | contribs)28 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 11:42, 26 August 2007 edit undoFT2 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators55,546 editsm moved Alleged Stalin's speech on August 19, 1939 to Stalin's alleged speech of August 19, 1939: speech is alleged, not Stalin !Next edit →
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Stalin's speech on ], ]''' is argued to have been a secret speech of ] to Soviet leaders, wherein he supposedly described the strategy of the ] in the eve of ]. Published allegations on the content of this speech, as well as opposing views, have been suspect of being ] and ]. This article discussed a speech alleged to have been given in secret by ] to ] leaders, two weeks prior to the ] and the start of ].


The historicity of the speech is still the subject of academic debate. Plausible textual copies of this speech found in various reputable archives have been academically studied and published, however no formal first-hand evidence of a ] meeting held on ], ] or the delivery of the quoted speech has yet been proven. Speeches given in secret were common at the time, the Politburo being a closed and secretive body. There are also reputable views that these copies were intended originally as ] and ]. Accordingly until consensus is reached by ]s, the discussion of the documents supporting such a thesis are described in this article as an "alleged" speech.
== Alleged summary ==
Stalin expressed an expectation that the war would be the best opportunity to weaken both the Western nations and ], and make Germany suitable for "]". The Soviet Union also expected territorial expansion to the ], ] and ] with the approval of either the Western powers or Germany.


In these reports, Stalin is represented as talking about his strategic view of the growing conflict in Europe, and his view that it would be benficial for the Soviet agenda, insofar as it would weaken the West, allowing possible territorial expansion. It has been speculated {{cite needed}} that if this was Stalin's view, the same strategic approach may have led to the ] pact of non-aggression between ] and the Soviet Union.
The opinions voiced by Stalin formed the basis for the Nazi-Soviet pact of non-aggression, known as the ].


==Historical background==
== History ==
{{sectstub}}
Whether this speech was ever given by Stalin is still the subject of dispute by historians and no proof was unanimously accepted. According to ]'s book '']'', Soviet historians laid special emphasis on proving that no ] meeting took place on ], ]. Nevertheless, Suvorov reports in his book, Russian military historian ] has found evidence that a meeting really took place on that day.


== Summary of documents ==
In the source material available to historians, Stalin is represented as expressing an expectation that the war would be the best opportunity to weaken both the Western nations and ], and make Germany suitable for "]". There is also expecttation of eventual territorial expansion to the ], ] and ], with the approval of either the Western powers or Germany.

Historians who have studied these documents have suggested that if such a speech took place, which is usually considered plausible but not proven (see below), then this view may have formed the basis for the Nazi-Soviet pact of non-aggression signed in ], known as the ], which was also signed days later around 23 - 24 August 1939.

== Source material and timeline ==
The first version of this speech was published on ], ], in the ] journal ''Revue de Droit International.'' Since then several versions, varying in content, have been in circulation. The first version of this speech was published on ], ], in the ] journal ''Revue de Droit International.'' Since then several versions, varying in content, have been in circulation.


In ] of ], ], the day of the outbreak of the ], Stalin was asked for his opinion on the report of "the speech" allegedly made "by Stalin to the Politburo on August 19", in which he is said to have expressed the thought that the war should go on as long as possible, so that the belligerents are exhausted." Stalin denied this tactic. Pravda then quoted Stalin as saying : In ] of ], ], the day of the outbreak of the ], Stalin was asked for his opinion on the report of "the speech" allegedly made "by Stalin to the Politburo on August 19", in which he is said to have expressed the thought that the war should go on as long as possible, so that the belligerents are exhausted." Stalin stated this was an incorrect assertion, and was quoted by Pravda as saying :
# that it cannot be denied that it was ] and ] that attacked Germany and consequently they are responsible for the present war; # that it cannot be denied that it was ] and ] that attacked Germany and consequently they are responsible for the present war;
# that Germany made peace proposals to France and England, proposals supported by the Soviet Union on the grounds that a quick end to the war would ease the situation of all countries and peoples; # that Germany made peace proposals to France and England, proposals supported by the Soviet Union on the grounds that a quick end to the war would ease the situation of all countries and peoples;
# that the ruling circles of England and France rudely rejected Germany's peace proposals. # that the ruling circles of England and France rudely rejected Germany's peace proposals.


In 1994, Russian publicist T. S. Bushuyeva published the alleged archival reference of the Speech in an article printed in the '']'' magazine (#12, 1994), based on what she claimed was recent findings in Soviet Special Archives of a text that according to her was supposedly recorded by a ] member present at the meeting. (The archive files location: Centre for the Preservation of Collections of Historical Documents, former Soviet Special Archives; fund 7, list 1, file 12239, in Russian: Центр хранения историко-документальных коллекций, бывший Особый архив СССР, ф. 7, оп. 1, д. 1223). In 1994, Russian publicist T. S. Bushuyeva published an archival reference of the speech in an article printed in the '']'' magazine (#12, 1994), based on what she claimed was recent findings in Soviet Special Archives of a text that according to her was supposedly recorded by a ] member present at the meeting. (The archive files location: Centre for the Preservation of Collections of Historical Documents, former Soviet Special Archives; fund 7, list 1, file 12239, in Russian: Центр хранения историко-документальных коллекций, бывший Особый архив СССР, ф. 7, оп. 1, д. 1223).


However, the actual original text is not available yet. Bushuyeva also printed a Russian translation of a version available in ]. This caused another surge of speculations on the issue. It turned out that the referred archival record is from the stock related to the documents of General Staff of the ], a fact omitted by Bushuyeva. The actual original text is not available yet. Bushuyeva also printed a Russian translation of a version available in ]. This caused another surge of speculations on the issue. Bushuyeva omitted to mention that the referred archival record was from stock related to the documents of General Staff of the ].


== Historicity and debate ==
An article in the ''Otechestvennaya Istoriya'' (History of the Fatherland), Отечественная история, 2004, № 1) by Sergey Sluch (С.З. Случ) critically reviews the history of the "Stalin's Speech", its textologial analysis, and possible reasons and sources of the possible forgery.
Whether this speech was ever given by Stalin is still the subject of dispute by historians and no proof is as yet unanimously accepted. According to ]'s book '']'', Soviet historians laid special emphasis on proving that no ] meeting took place on ], ]. Nevertheless, Suvorov states in his book that Russian military historian ] has found evidence that a meeting really took place on that day.


At the same time, "proofs" of non-existence of the speech are also being met with scepticism, in view of a similar vigorous denial of the Secret Protocol to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. ] (himself an amateur historian, known for his ]) has pointed out some counter-theses to Sluch' disapproval of the existence of such speech. Historical documents demonstrating the non-existence of the speech are also met with scepticism, in view of a similar vigorous denial of the Secret Protocol to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. ] (an amateur historian known for his ]) has pointed out some counter-theses to Sluch' disapproval of the existence of such speech.


An article in the ''Otechestvennaya Istoriya'' (History of the Fatherland), Отечественная история, 2004, № 1) by Sergey Sluch (С.З. Случ) critically reviews the history of the "Stalin's Speech", its textologial analysis, and possible reasons and sources of the possible forgery.
== References ==


== References ==
<references/> <references/>
*Revue de Droit International, de Sciences Diplomatiques et Politiques (The International Law Review), 1939, Nr. 3, Juillet-Septembre. P. 247-249. *Revue de Droit International, de Sciences Diplomatiques et Politiques (The International Law Review), 1939, Nr. 3, Juillet-Septembre. P. 247-249.

Revision as of 11:42, 26 August 2007

This article discussed a speech alleged to have been given in secret by Joseph Stalin to Soviet leaders, two weeks prior to the German invasion of Poland and the start of World War 2.

The historicity of the speech is still the subject of academic debate. Plausible textual copies of this speech found in various reputable archives have been academically studied and published, however no formal first-hand evidence of a Politburo meeting held on August 19, 1939 or the delivery of the quoted speech has yet been proven. Speeches given in secret were common at the time, the Politburo being a closed and secretive body. There are also reputable views that these copies were intended originally as propaganda and disinformation. Accordingly until consensus is reached by historians, the discussion of the documents supporting such a thesis are described in this article as an "alleged" speech.

In these reports, Stalin is represented as talking about his strategic view of the growing conflict in Europe, and his view that it would be benficial for the Soviet agenda, insofar as it would weaken the West, allowing possible territorial expansion. It has been speculated that if this was Stalin's view, the same strategic approach may have led to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact pact of non-aggression between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.

Historical background

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it.

Summary of documents

In the source material available to historians, Stalin is represented as expressing an expectation that the war would be the best opportunity to weaken both the Western nations and Nazi Germany, and make Germany suitable for "Sovietization". There is also expecttation of eventual territorial expansion to the Baltic countries, Finland and Poland, with the approval of either the Western powers or Germany.

Historians who have studied these documents have suggested that if such a speech took place, which is usually considered plausible but not proven (see below), then this view may have formed the basis for the Nazi-Soviet pact of non-aggression signed in 1939, known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, which was also signed days later around 23 - 24 August 1939.

Source material and timeline

The first version of this speech was published on November 28, 1939, in the Swiss journal Revue de Droit International. Since then several versions, varying in content, have been in circulation.

In Pravda of November 30, 1939, the day of the outbreak of the Winter War, Stalin was asked for his opinion on the report of "the speech" allegedly made "by Stalin to the Politburo on August 19", in which he is said to have expressed the thought that the war should go on as long as possible, so that the belligerents are exhausted." Stalin stated this was an incorrect assertion, and was quoted by Pravda as saying :

  1. that it cannot be denied that it was France and England that attacked Germany and consequently they are responsible for the present war;
  2. that Germany made peace proposals to France and England, proposals supported by the Soviet Union on the grounds that a quick end to the war would ease the situation of all countries and peoples;
  3. that the ruling circles of England and France rudely rejected Germany's peace proposals.

In 1994, Russian publicist T. S. Bushuyeva published an archival reference of the speech in an article printed in the Novy Mir magazine (#12, 1994), based on what she claimed was recent findings in Soviet Special Archives of a text that according to her was supposedly recorded by a Comintern member present at the meeting. (The archive files location: Centre for the Preservation of Collections of Historical Documents, former Soviet Special Archives; fund 7, list 1, file 12239, in Russian: Центр хранения историко-документальных коллекций, бывший Особый архив СССР, ф. 7, оп. 1, д. 1223).

The actual original text is not available yet. Bushuyeva also printed a Russian translation of a version available in French. This caused another surge of speculations on the issue. Bushuyeva omitted to mention that the referred archival record was from stock related to the documents of General Staff of the French Army.

Historicity and debate

Whether this speech was ever given by Stalin is still the subject of dispute by historians and no proof is as yet unanimously accepted. According to Viktor Suvorov's book M-Day, Soviet historians laid special emphasis on proving that no Politburo meeting took place on August 19, 1939. Nevertheless, Suvorov states in his book that Russian military historian Dmitri Volkogonov has found evidence that a meeting really took place on that day.

Historical documents demonstrating the non-existence of the speech are also met with scepticism, in view of a similar vigorous denial of the Secret Protocol to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. Carl Nordling (an amateur historian known for his Holocaust denial) has pointed out some counter-theses to Sluch' disapproval of the existence of such speech.

An article in the Otechestvennaya Istoriya (History of the Fatherland), Отечественная история, 2004, № 1) by Sergey Sluch (С.З. Случ) critically reviews the history of the "Stalin's Speech", its textologial analysis, and possible reasons and sources of the possible forgery.

References

  • Revue de Droit International, de Sciences Diplomatiques et Politiques (The International Law Review), 1939, Nr. 3, Juillet-Septembre. P. 247-249.
  • Otechestvennaya Istoriya Отечественная история, 2004, № 1, pp. 113-139.
  • A.L.Weeks Stalin's Other War: Soviet Grand Strategy, 1939-1941 ISBN 0-7425-2191-5

See also

External links

Categories: