| Revision as of 09:29, 2 September 2007 editBksimonb (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,067 edits Removed very old rfc. BKWSU article.← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:54, 2 September 2007 edit undoAndries (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers27,090 edits Use of the term dharmic religions in several articlesNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| <!-- Add new items here at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign --> | <!-- Add new items here at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign --> | ||
| *Use of the term ] in several articles e.g. ]. One editor thinks that the phrase is an obscure neologism and should not or hardly be used in Misplaced Pages. While another editor thinks that it okay to use in this context. See the preferred place for centralized discussion here ] and ]. ] 21:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *] - Article reads like an advertisment for recruitment into the organization and appears to be cited and edited with people and authors biased towards the organization, including the organization's president, hence the dispute. ] 19:38, 11 August 2007 (UTC) | *] - Article reads like an advertisment for recruitment into the organization and appears to be cited and edited with people and authors biased towards the organization, including the organization's president, hence the dispute. ] 19:38, 11 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *] - There is a dispute as to weather or not to cite in the individual articles of the subjects, or the list itself. 15:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | *] - There is a dispute as to weather or not to cite in the individual articles of the subjects, or the list itself. 15:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:54, 2 September 2007
Shortcut- ]
- ]
Template:RFCheader Template loop detected: Template:RFCreli list
- Use of the term dharmic religions in several articles e.g. Talk:Human#Dharmic_religions. One editor thinks that the phrase is an obscure neologism and should not or hardly be used in Misplaced Pages. While another editor thinks that it okay to use in this context. See the preferred place for centralized discussion here Wikipedia_talk:Hinduism-related_topics_notice_board#Dharmic_Religions and Talk:Dharmic_religion#Please_do_not_remove_request_for_citations. Andries 21:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, Inc. - Article reads like an advertisment for recruitment into the organization and appears to be cited and edited with people and authors biased towards the organization, including the organization's president, hence the dispute. Kephera975 19:38, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:List of Ministers of the Universal Life Church - There is a dispute as to weather or not to cite in the individual articles of the subjects, or the list itself. 15:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Category talk:Death in the United States - There is a dispute between two editors regarding if Category:Death in the United States belongs within Category:United States, and if it does, at what place(s) in Category:United States's tree is most appropriate. 03:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Use of the word 'cult' in the Heaven's Gate article - the argument revolves around whether it is neutral or prejudicial to describe/categorize the religious movement as a cult. 04:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Sahaja_Yoga#RFC- Looking for outside input on whether or not to include an actual copy of charts used by this organization to "diagnose imbalances in the chakras" inside the article. Sethie
- Talk:Jesus myth hypothesis#Request for comment - a question to determine what the specific title of the article should be, and what content should be contained within the article. 17:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Jesus#Request for Comment On the use of BC/AD and BCE/CE tags with dates. 14:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Discussion about the fact that the bot has stopped tagging WikiProject Logic articles due to complaints. 22:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Great_Commission_Association#RfC_On_Selected_Sections Do the disputed sections make the article too long, or are they being removed for content. 21:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University#Inclusion_of_E.Romain.27s_website_as_an_external_link Discussion on whether this website should be included in the article as a reference/external link.* Romain, Eugene (2001). "Report on Child Abuse, Beliefs and Lifestyle within BKWSU". Retrieved 2007-07-28. 12:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:British Centre for Science Education Discussion involving verifiability and suitability of a specific quote.23:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Discussion at WikiProject_Mathematics about removing "Mathematical logicians" from logicians category, et al.
- Ebionites Talk:Ebionites#Religious vegetarianism redux. We are having a recurring argument about undue weight and how to properly apply it. Are we obligated to include the opinions of fringe scholars, and where do we draw the line? Ovadyah 20:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Jan de Bakker. We are having a difference of opinion about the precise meaning of the word "Heretical". I would like to have some input from native speakers of English to clear up the issue, Talk:Jan de Bakker#Heretical. 14:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Vedas trying to add a content that states the presence of the Vedas being probably 5 against the commonly commonly known four.08:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Mathematical logic (Talk:Mathematical logic) -- approaching third revert of User:Trovatore, insisting that Mathematical logic is not logic. 02:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Religious discrimination against Neopagans (Talk:Religious discrimination against Neopagans#Denominations or religions?) is "various neopagan denominations" or "various neopagan religions" more correct? 13:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Muhammad: Is the "satanic verses" incident (not the Rushdie book, but the account of heretical verses being added to the Qur'an in Muhammad's day) to be reported as historical fact?14:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- Involution (philosophy) (talk): Dispute over whether to rename and move the article 14:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Infidel#Request_for_Comment:_Infidel_Dictionary_Terms: Dispute over Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages is not a dictionary. Should the article cover a dictionary term or be focused on the ecclesiastical term.--Tigeroo 16:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:John_Bosco#Request_for_comment Dispute about whether a saint used dreams to blackmail others and the use of an Italian language source we can't read. ----evrik 17:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Use of the term dharmic religions in several articles e.g. Talk:Human#Dharmic_religions. One editor thinks that the phrase is an obscure neologism and should not or hardly be used in Misplaced Pages. While another editor thinks that it okay to use in this context. See the preferred place for centralized discussion here Wikipedia_talk:Hinduism-related_topics_notice_board#Dharmic_Religions and Talk:Dharmic_religion#Please_do_not_remove_request_for_citations. Andries 21:54, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, Inc. - Article reads like an advertisment for recruitment into the organization and appears to be cited and edited with people and authors biased towards the organization, including the organization's president, hence the dispute. Kephera975 19:38, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:List of Ministers of the Universal Life Church - There is a dispute as to weather or not to cite in the individual articles of the subjects, or the list itself. 15:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
- Category talk:Death in the United States - There is a dispute between two editors regarding if Category:Death in the United States belongs within Category:United States, and if it does, at what place(s) in Category:United States's tree is most appropriate. 03:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
- Use of the word 'cult' in the Heaven's Gate article - the argument revolves around whether it is neutral or prejudicial to describe/categorize the religious movement as a cult. 04:27, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Sahaja_Yoga#RFC- Looking for outside input on whether or not to include an actual copy of charts used by this organization to "diagnose imbalances in the chakras" inside the article. Sethie
- Talk:Jesus myth hypothesis#Request for comment - a question to determine what the specific title of the article should be, and what content should be contained within the article. 17:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Jesus#Request for Comment On the use of BC/AD and BCE/CE tags with dates. 14:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Discussion about the fact that the bot has stopped tagging WikiProject Logic articles due to complaints. 22:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Great_Commission_Association#RfC_On_Selected_Sections Do the disputed sections make the article too long, or are they being removed for content. 21:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University#Inclusion_of_E.Romain.27s_website_as_an_external_link Discussion on whether this website should be included in the article as a reference/external link.* Romain, Eugene (2001). "Report on Child Abuse, Beliefs and Lifestyle within BKWSU". Retrieved 2007-07-28. 12:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:British Centre for Science Education Discussion involving verifiability and suitability of a specific quote.23:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Discussion at WikiProject_Mathematics about removing "Mathematical logicians" from logicians category, et al.
- Ebionites Talk:Ebionites#Religious vegetarianism redux. We are having a recurring argument about undue weight and how to properly apply it. Are we obligated to include the opinions of fringe scholars, and where do we draw the line? Ovadyah 20:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Jan de Bakker. We are having a difference of opinion about the precise meaning of the word "Heretical". I would like to have some input from native speakers of English to clear up the issue, Talk:Jan de Bakker#Heretical. 14:30, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Vedas trying to add a content that states the presence of the Vedas being probably 5 against the commonly commonly known four.08:50, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Mathematical logic (Talk:Mathematical logic) -- approaching third revert of User:Trovatore, insisting that Mathematical logic is not logic. 02:27, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Religious discrimination against Neopagans (Talk:Religious discrimination against Neopagans#Denominations or religions?) is "various neopagan denominations" or "various neopagan religions" more correct? 13:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Muhammad: Is the "satanic verses" incident (not the Rushdie book, but the account of heretical verses being added to the Qur'an in Muhammad's day) to be reported as historical fact?14:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- Involution (philosophy) (talk): Dispute over whether to rename and move the article 14:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:Infidel#Request_for_Comment:_Infidel_Dictionary_Terms: Dispute over Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages is not a dictionary. Should the article cover a dictionary term or be focused on the ecclesiastical term.--Tigeroo 16:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Talk:John_Bosco#Request_for_comment Dispute about whether a saint used dreams to blackmail others and the use of an Italian language source we can't read. ----evrik 17:45, 5 July 2007 (UTC)