| Revision as of 07:31, 11 September 2007 editZsero (talk | contribs)12,092 edits →Online banner← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:41, 11 September 2007 edit undoHu12 (talk | contribs)91,877 edits →This is pure harassment.Next edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
| ==Your warning to Italiavivi== | ==Your warning to Italiavivi== | ||
| Hu, ]. That's just pouring oil on the flame. Italiavivi says those IPs aren't his/hers. If you don't believe him/her, feel free to say so - I'm long past assuming that everything s/he says is true - but using the template seems an unnecessary insult. That's a line I'm trying hard not to cross no matter how annoyed I get with him/her. -- ] 07:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | Hu, ]. That's just pouring oil on the flame. Italiavivi says those IPs aren't his/hers. If you don't believe him/her, feel free to say so - I'm long past assuming that everything s/he says is true - but using the template seems an unnecessary insult. That's a line I'm trying hard not to cross no matter how annoyed I get with him/her. -- ] 07:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == This is pure harassment. == | |||
| Your repeatedly attributing an entire IP range from a large ISP to myself, including years-old IP addresses from random locations and edits which are clearly not mine, is ]. These IPs are ''not'' mine, and I will seek recourse over your insistence of this unsubstantiated attribution. ]<sup>]</sup> 07:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for the threats and personal attack!--] 07:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:41, 11 September 2007
| Archives |
|---|
| /Archive /Archive2 /Archive3 /Archive4 /Archive5 /Archive6 WP:GRIEF m:MPOV |
| If I start a conversation on your talk page, I'm watching it. Please leave responses on your talk page. Thanks. |
| “ | Another key to the problem here, {name of contentious editor}. You don't see yourself as having an opinion; you see yourself as bearing the Truth. You perceive your biases as neutral.. | ” |
| — WP:TIGERS | ||
| The following is a list of articles currently nominated for speedy deletion. |
| I'm currently in the process of re-assessing the usefulness of this tool. It may be replaced with something using the new <categorytree> syntax (although that doesn't have all of the functionality), or it might be deleted altogether. If you have any comments, please make them known on the talk page. --Cyde Weys 02:52, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
The CSD list is not intended to be used for transclusion purposes. By doing so, you are creating many unnecessary "What links here" entries that administrators on CSD patrol have to peruse on each deletion. Think of the tiny benefit that transclusion affords you versus the large hindrance that it creates to many administrators each time every CSD is dealt with, and you will realize why it is no longer permitted.
See also |
|
|---|
| This is a list of deletable PRODs. |
| Category:Expired proposed deletions |
|
|---|
| This is a readout of various categories. |
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| This is a readout of the current RfAs. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Welcome
Welcome to the talk page--Hu12 17:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Archivists
I am (slowly) trying to gather and compile an essay on the single purpose accounts that add external links, which, after removal are overruled as 'they are good and on topic links, I don't understand why this is considered spam'. Apparently these removals (and other accounts overriding the removals) give much aggravation. May I invite you to help me (re)writing the points (both in favour and against), and further compile this document? I have it here for the moment: User:Beetstra/Archivists. Thanks. --Dirk Beetstra 10:39, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- I have now done some work on the essay and am thinking about moving it to the wikipedia namespace. Would like to hear some input from you (and maybe you have a proper suggestion for a name). Hope to hear from you. --Dirk Beetstra 13:54, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
Sunderland06 talk page
please can you delete your comments from my page, thanks.--Sunderland06 18:48, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- sorry both personal attacks and Bad-faith placing of deletion tags or other tags on pages that do not meet such criteria is vandalism.--Hu12 18:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Sorry but can you please delete your comments i will not do it again --Sunderland06 18:53, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Easington Community Science Collage
Can you please delete this page because it is spelt incorrectly, thanks --Sunderland06 18:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Done Author request--Hu12 18:55, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you good friend --Sunderland06 18:56, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
You have deleted the wrong page it was the Easington Community Science Collage can you reinstate the correct one which is EASINGTON COMMUNITY SCIENCE COLLEGE thanks --Sunderland06 19:01, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Easington Community Science College was never deleted, however I restored the misspelled one with a redirect.--Hu12 19:15, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
OK Thanks --Sunderland06 16:11, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Gavin Donoghue
I declined speedy on him; he plays for a English premiership team - meets WP:BIO. Carlossuarez46 20:33, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- ok , so he infact plays. There were issues with some articles created, that never actually played and saw no refference to that effect. thanks--Hu12 20:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
So i can remove the warning on his page, cheaz --Sunderland06 20:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Warning removal
Users are free to remove warnings or anything else they want to from their talkpage. Forcing them to keep warnings on their talkpage is considered harassment. --Carnildo 21:58, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Removing vandalism and warning a user isn't harassment. Not sure of your involvement but perhaps you'd prefer me to block the user for the violations instead? I think NPA and Abuse of tags against User talk:Jaranda was uncalled for and clearly harassment. warnings offer a softer approach than banning. Feel free to remove them, however archiving is preffered--Hu12 22:28, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- Removing vandalism and warning the user isn't harassment. Forcing them to keep the warnings on their talkpage is. --Carnildo 22:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
- So does that mean i can delete the warnings from my page then, thanks --Sunderland06 16:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- You may archive them see Help:Archiving a talk page--Hu12 18:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- You can also delete them outright, but archiving is preferred. --Carnildo 19:28, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- You can give them as a gift to Carnildo.., no you really can't. LOL ;)--Hu12 19:43, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- You can also delete them outright, but archiving is preferred. --Carnildo 19:28, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- You may archive them see Help:Archiving a talk page--Hu12 18:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
How to get awards
What is an easy way to get an award? I have made a School page updated the kazakhstan national football team and updated alot of sportman pages Can i get an award from them. --Sunderland06 20:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- A place to start is Misplaced Pages:Awards. Awards are usualy given to you by other wikipedians in recognition of hard work, due diligence ect. Misplaced Pages:Service awards is intended to be given to yourself, however they have requirements.--Hu12 20:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Will editing the kazakhstan national football team help? --Sunderland06 20:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- I would first focus on your WP:CIVIL issues with User:Jaranda. You cant vandalize or call people names, especialy those with whom you edit alogn side with. Those with whom you edit alogn side with are the ones most likely to give you an Award, as they see you contributions. You have one edit to kazakhstan national football team, I'll assume your joking asking that question. After what you did to a fellow editor yesterday, feel awarded you were not blocked.--Hu12 20:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hu12, looking at Misplaced Pages:Service awards, I see you've been overly modest; by edit count you would now be a Lord High Tutnum, however, without the longevity in months, you're still a Grognard Extraordinary!
- Sunderland06, you're walking in big footsteps; that football team needs your help -- go for it.
- Sunderland06, you're walking in big footsteps; that football team needs your help -- go for it.
--A. B. 20:46, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Oh... didn't realize I had such a large editing problem. I hope the 1937 Misplaced Pages First Edition has alot of pictures, I'm tired of reading..LOL. Thanks A. B.! --Hu12 20:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Big blacklisting request headed your way in a few days
FYI, Videmus Omnia and I are developing a big list:
Discussion:
I'll let you know when we've got more done. --A. B. 20:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
I See. Let me know...--Hu12 15:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Online banner
Can you tell me if you know how to get that banner that says if youre online. --Sunderland06 16:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Your warning to Italiavivi
Hu, WP:DTTR. That's just pouring oil on the flame. Italiavivi says those IPs aren't his/hers. If you don't believe him/her, feel free to say so - I'm long past assuming that everything s/he says is true - but using the template seems an unnecessary insult. That's a line I'm trying hard not to cross no matter how annoyed I get with him/her. -- Zsero 07:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
This is pure harassment.
Your repeatedly attributing an entire IP range from a large ISP to myself, including years-old IP addresses from random locations and edits which are clearly not mine, is harassment. These IPs are not mine, and I will seek recourse over your insistence of this unsubstantiated attribution. Italia 07:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the threats and personal attack!--Hu12 07:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)