Revision as of 07:00, 12 September 2007 editMiranda (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,620 edits →Velebit: remove unlisted← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:59, 15 September 2007 edit undoLar (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators29,174 edits findingsNext edit → | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Users Guivon and Votec are forever bloked sockpuppets of user Velebit which has been blocked. Aroung 10 days after "user:Guivon" has become blocked we are having new user under name user:Votec which is doing similar stuff to blocked users or saying simple he is editing how Croats are bad and how Serbs are victims using like source wartime Serbian propaganda. ] is ] account !! ] 23:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | Users Guivon and Votec are forever bloked sockpuppets of user Velebit which has been blocked. Aroung 10 days after "user:Guivon" has become blocked we are having new user under name user:Votec which is doing similar stuff to blocked users or saying simple he is editing how Croats are bad and how Serbs are victims using like source wartime Serbian propaganda. ] is ] account !! ] 23:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Please notice editing of 5 september between 18:00-18:30. ] has made log in and deleted discussion page and 15 minutes after that ] has made log in. ] 15:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | :Please notice editing of 5 september between 18:00-18:30. ] has made log in and deleted discussion page and 15 minutes after that ] has made log in. ] 15:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
A lot to talk about here. Please see also ]. I should also note that I have been involved in investigating Velebit, NovaNova and Guivon on this wiki and elsewhere, as a result of requests from other checkusers already. Others have requested and run various checks too. Velebit, Guivon, and NovaNova have already been marked as sockpuppets, or suspected sockpuppets of each other, along with GiorgioOrsini. Nothing in my investigations would counterindicate that.. | |||
* {{likely}} that | |||
** {{checkuser|Velebit}} | |||
**{{checkuser|NovaNova}} | |||
**{{checkuser|GiorgioOrsini}} | |||
**{{checkuser|Guivon}} are related. (no change) | |||
* {{likely}} that {{checkuser|Modelsides}} is related to Velabit, et al (already tagged and blocked but worth mentioning) | |||
But we knew all that... the new identities here are Votek and the two 212 IPs | |||
* Votek is {{unrelated}} to Velebit, et al. | |||
* 212.200.198.125 is {{unrelated}} to be related Velebit, et al... also unrelated to Votek | |||
* 212.200.198.33 is {{unrelated}} to Velebit, et al... also unrelated to Votek | |||
I agree that Votek's editing is at best, odd. I'd consider it disruptive, and very SPA-ish. but I'm not seeing the connection. There is more than one person with an ax to grind in this area, I am sure. ++]: ]/] 00:59, 15 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:59, 15 September 2007
Velebit
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 23:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC) |
- Velebit (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Votec (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Guivon (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- NovaNova (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- 212.200.198.125 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- 212.200.198.33 (talk · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
- Code letter:F
Users Guivon and Votec are forever bloked sockpuppets of user Velebit which has been blocked. Aroung 10 days after "user:Guivon" has become blocked we are having new user under name user:Votec which is doing similar stuff to blocked users or saying simple he is editing how Croats are bad and how Serbs are victims using like source wartime Serbian propaganda. User:Votec is WP:SPA account !! Rjecina 23:51, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
- Please notice editing of 5 september between 18:00-18:30. User:Velebit has made log in and deleted discussion page and 15 minutes after that User:Votec has made log in. Rjecina 15:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
A lot to talk about here. Please see also Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Giovanni Giove. I should also note that I have been involved in investigating Velebit, NovaNova and Guivon on this wiki and elsewhere, as a result of requests from other checkusers already. Others have requested and run various checks too. Velebit, Guivon, and NovaNova have already been marked as sockpuppets, or suspected sockpuppets of each other, along with GiorgioOrsini. Nothing in my investigations would counterindicate that..
- Likely that
- Velebit (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- NovaNova (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- GiorgioOrsini (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Guivon (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) are related. (no change)
- Likely that Modelsides (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) is related to Velabit, et al (already tagged and blocked but worth mentioning)
But we knew all that... the new identities here are Votek and the two 212 IPs
- Votek is Unrelated to Velebit, et al.
- 212.200.198.125 is Unrelated to be related Velebit, et al... also unrelated to Votek
- 212.200.198.33 is Unrelated to Velebit, et al... also unrelated to Votek
I agree that Votek's editing is at best, odd. I'd consider it disruptive, and very SPA-ish. but I'm not seeing the connection. There is more than one person with an ax to grind in this area, I am sure. ++Lar: t/c 00:59, 15 September 2007 (UTC)