| Revision as of 10:51, 18 September 2007 editOnorem (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,735 edits npa3← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:23, 18 September 2007 edit undoHipal (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers137,994 edits More edit warring at Cydonia MensaeNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| {{{icon|] }}}Please ] other editors{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, which you did here: ]}}. If you continue, you '''will''' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> --]♠] 10:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC) | {{{icon|] }}}Please ] other editors{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, which you did here: ]}}. If you continue, you '''will''' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-npa3 --> --]♠] 10:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==More edit warring at Cydonia Mensae== | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> --] 15:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:23, 18 September 2007
Please do not add nonsense to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Cheryl Cole. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Xdamr 11:53, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
April 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Stonehenge. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Whereizben - Chat with me - My Contributions 15:57, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
An encyclopedia isn't the place to carry out a grudge against this company; contact 'one' direct or contact your MP if you have a grievance. I removed your section on 'severe delays' as you haven't given enough thought to it. You need to explain or link to established criteria and be clear about what trains and services were affected; perhaps by using their headcode. To be honest though, if people are interested in this kind of minutae they will find it from the DfT or PassengerFocus. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.31.181.58 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Cydonia Mensae
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. -- Ronz 17:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. -- Ronz 14:59, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Recent editing at Cydonia Mensae
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cydonia Mensae. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. I recognize that this was several days ago, but this dispute still seems to be unresolved. Please discuss the issue on the talk page rather than making any further reversions to the article. Thanks.--Chaser - T 21:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. --Onorem♠Dil 10:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
More edit warring at Cydonia Mensae
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. --Ronz 15:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)