Misplaced Pages

User talk:Mpublius: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:32, 18 September 2007 editFamspear (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers31,315 edits Ed warring on Tom Cryer: Add another warning.← Previous edit Revision as of 17:28, 19 September 2007 edit undoFamspear (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers31,315 edits Still another warningNext edit →
Line 88: Line 88:


{{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Tom Cryer|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> Yours, ] 17:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC) {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Tom Cryer|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> Yours, ] 17:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


==Still more edit warring on ]==

{{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Tom Cryer|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> Yours, ] 17:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:28, 19 September 2007

Welcome to Misplaced Pages

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! The following materials may be helpful:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Five_pillars

"Neutral Point of View": http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view (official policy)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ (official policy)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:NPOV_dispute (maintenance process, including the rule prohibiting drive-by tagging)

"Verifiability": http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Verifiability (official policy)

"No Original Research": http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:No_original_research) (official policy)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Attribution (summary of Verifiability and No Original Research)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Consensus (official policy)

http://en.wikipedia.org/WP:ATT/FAQ (proposed policy, guideline or process)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Etiquette (behavioral guideline)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources (guideline)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources#Using_online_and_self-published_sources (guideline)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Citing_sources (style guide)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not (official policy)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories (content guideline)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith (official policy)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons (official policy)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines (guideline)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule (official policy)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Edit_war (editing guideline)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Disruptive_editing (behavioral guideline)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:External_links (guideline)

Yours, Famspear 22:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Ed warring on Tom Cryer

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tom Cryer. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Famspear 16:23, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Dear Mpublius: Your apparent violation of the 3 revert rule in the article Tom Cryer has been reported at:

Yours, Famspear 19:16, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 18 hours in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at TomCryer. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Heimstern Läufer (talk) 22:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

More edit warring on Tom Cryer

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tom Cryer. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Yours, Famspear 17:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


Still more edit warring on Tom Cryer

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tom Cryer. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Yours, Famspear 17:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)