| Revision as of 08:45, 1 October 2007 editNiaz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,690 edits keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:21, 1 October 2007 edit undoRocket000 (talk | contribs)12,661 edits →Cultural impact of Star WarsNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| *'''Strong Keep and expand''' it really is not original research as per ]. Also "to put it out of its misery" is not a reason to nominate a page for deletion. --] 03:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | *'''Strong Keep and expand''' it really is not original research as per ]. Also "to put it out of its misery" is not a reason to nominate a page for deletion. --] 03:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' but expand. ]]] 08:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' but expand. ]]] 08:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong Keep and expand''' per ] and ] Not OR. Nominated for wrong reasons. ] 16:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:21, 1 October 2007
Cultural impact of Star Wars
- Cultural impact of Star Wars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Stub, unsourced, US bias, and more than adequately covered in the main article. Just put it out of its misery. - Sikon 18:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- There's much more than this in the main article. Either move the material in the main page here or delete; the former might be a good idea as the main page is getting long. This question is worthy of serious debate but I'm not sure AFD is the right forum. Alba 18:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and also contains incorrect information, see my note on its talk page. Robert K S 20:22, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete doesn't merit a separate article. JJL 23:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Imperial delete Pure original research. Mandsford 01:47, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and expand As Alba says, the solution is to move material from the main page here. there's enough for a separate article. If there is too much of a US bias--then add material dealing with other places. DGG (talk) 05:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Pretty much all of the text is already covered in either the main star wars article or another, more relevant one. OR and redundant. Delete this one we should. Spawn Man 12:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete excess fat needing a trim. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 01:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Strong keep, because not original research, TV shows and major news has been dedicated to the topic a la CNN and even the Smithsonian had an exhibit that "examines the impact of the film 'Star Wars' on world culture of the late 20th century and how the George Lucas film trilogy has touched people of all ages through its use of classical mythology." Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 01:29, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This is an OR essay and sounds like something that belongs on the main page, I should also point out this related AFD that resulted in a delete. Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of cultural references to Star Wars. Dannycali 02:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep The external links now in the article show that there are reliable sources about the cultural impact Star Wars has had. They can be used to fix the article's problems. Bláthnaid 10:52, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete- something Alkivar and I can agree on it seems. Come on, this is a clear delete... cultural impact of star wars? I know guys like DGG vote to keep everything (as near as I can tell), but this really has no place...JJJ999 13:22, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- If you mean this personally, on this day's page I have 4 deletes and 6 keeps; If you look at my log, I delete about a dozen speedies a day. DGG (talk) 00:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. This is clearly original research. RobJ1981 14:11, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete violates WP:NOR Jbeach56 22:20, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep and expand it really is not original research as per Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles. Also "to put it out of its misery" is not a reason to nominate a page for deletion. --S.dedalus 03:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but expand. Niaz 08:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep and expand per DGG and Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles Not OR. Nominated for wrong reasons. Rocket000 16:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)