| Revision as of 16:28, 7 October 2007 editThe Wikipedist (talk | contribs)231 edits →October 2007: forgot sig← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:37, 7 October 2007 edit undoDuncanHill (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers163,185 edits →October 2007: defamatory editNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| {{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to ], did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] ] 16:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | {{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to ], did not appear to be constructive and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ] ] 16:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| {{{icon|] }}}Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Talk:Historical pederastic couples||some of}} your recent edits {{{{{subst|}}}#if:Talk:Historical pederastic couples|to ]}} have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially ]. Take a look at our ] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-defamatory1 --> ] 16:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:37, 7 October 2007
Your entry on the John Stossel article's talk page
I'm confused. Why did you change my consensus call on the John Stossel article's talk page? And your comment is confusing and doesn't make sense. I've been in several consensus calls and actually have been chided for not properly closing one, as I just have, by an admin. Before I revert your edit, I want to give the benefit of the doubt and find out why. I don't and have never claimed to be an expert and am always willing to learn, so, help me with why you did why you did. Otherwise, I'm going to close the consensus call as I already have twice. That discussion is over and we have moved on and I am trying to close it. Thanks! --Maniwar (talk) 02:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Ron Paul photo
Please revert your edit removing the latest campaign photo of Ron Paul. His campaign has already released the photo to reproduction... here: http://www.ronpaul2008.com/files/RP2008SlimJim.pdf Notice "permission to reprint granted"... it's obviously a publicity photo meant for reproduction. Please revert.--146.82.18.10 05:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Custom CSS
Hi. I mentioned in my advice at VPP that you would need to hide the language portlet, but you may have missed it. Not ideal if you actually use it of course, but most people don't, so it may not be a big loss for you. I didn't mention the code required other than mentioning that it was in my CSS file on the fourth line, so here's the bit that you need: #p-lang {display: none;} If you want to fix the nav portlet as well, that is controlled by the #p-navigation ID in the same way as the other IDs. Hope that helps. Message me if you get stuck. Regards, Adrian M. H. 21:47, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Oops
That revert was my bad. I haven't seen a lot of WikiNews inclusions - didn't even know they were citable (like citing wiki articles - is the comparison of the two situations on par?). I pulled it coz in the edit screen it looked like an incomplete thought. Let me know about wikinews citation, if you could... - Arcayne () 03:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
October 2007
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Historical pederastic couples, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. The Wikipedist 16:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, your recent edits to Talk:Historical pederastic couples have been reverted as they could be seen to be defamatory or potentially libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. DuncanHill 16:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)