| Revision as of 21:03, 22 January 2007 editHenitsirk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users667 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:59, 11 October 2007 edit undoRocksanddirt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,954 edits strike rfc line. | ||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| This To Do box is only for controversial issues that still need to be to be resolved - see ] for more information. Once an item has resolved please strike out using '''<nowiki><strike></nowiki>''' function. | This To Do box is only for controversial issues that still need to be to be resolved - see ] for more information. Once an item has resolved please strike out using '''<nowiki><strike></nowiki>''' function. | ||
| <strike>*Add fact tags where citations are still needed</strike> | |||
| *Waldorf schools = religious or spiritual? | |||
| *<strike>Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?</strike> ''I don't think that has been decided - the only decision has been about the source. Teachers ''are'' teaching about Lucifer (as others here have testified) and if a different source says/confirms this, it definitely belongs in an article about Waldorf.'' '''] 17:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| *<s>Summarize reading controversy, reduce long quotes (if possible without excluding relevant material)</s> | |||
| **New section in Antrhoposophy, new question is do we have sources for the influence of Lucifer on teaching? ''The Anthroposophy section should talk about Lucifer and Ahriman. There's no need to link this topic to teaching in that article. If there's a link to teaching, it belongs in the Waldorf article and should reference the more thoroughly covered treatment of this topic in the Anthroposophy article.'' '''] 17:27, 22 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| *Review the WP:NPOV and applicability to the current article. | |||
| *<strike>Add section about the temperaments.</strike> | |||
| *<s>Prepare an RfC for more editors to review the article.</s> | |||
| *Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information? | |||
| *Add a Waldorf criticism section. | |||
Latest revision as of 17:59, 11 October 2007
This To Do box is only for controversial issues that still need to be to be resolved - see here for more information. Once an item has resolved please strike out using <strike> function.
*Add fact tags where citations are still needed
Summarize reading controversy, reduce long quotes (if possible without excluding relevant material)- Review the WP:NPOV and applicability to the current article.
Prepare an RfC for more editors to review the article.