| Revision as of 16:33, 26 January 2007 editPete K (talk | contribs)3,760 edits I think we've decided they are definitely Waldorf cheerleaders and therefore unreliable sources.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:59, 11 October 2007 edit undoRocksanddirt (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,954 edits strike rfc line. | ||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| This To Do box is only for controversial issues that still need to be to be resolved - see ] for more information. Once an item has resolved please strike out using '''<nowiki><strike></nowiki>''' function. | This To Do box is only for controversial issues that still need to be to be resolved - see ] for more information. Once an item has resolved please strike out using '''<nowiki><strike></nowiki>''' function. | ||
| <strike>*Add fact tags where citations are still needed</strike> | |||
| *Waldorf schools = religious or spiritual? | |||
| *<strike>Do we want a section on alleged teaching about Lucifer?</strike> | |||
| *<s>Summarize reading controversy, reduce long quotes (if possible without excluding relevant material)</s> | |||
| **New Lucifer/Ahriman section in Antrhoposophy | |||
| *Review the WP:NPOV and applicability to the current article. | |||
| ***New question is do we <s>have</s> <s>need</s> have sources for the influence of Lucifer on teaching? | |||
| *<s>Prepare an RfC for more editors to review the article.</s> | |||
| *<strike>Add section about the temperaments.</strike> | |||
| *<s>Is Petrash/Barnes an acceptable source, and if so to back up what sort of information?</s> | |||
| *<strike>Add a Waldorf criticism section.</strike> | |||
| **Add other sections to criticism section - currently only Racism | |||
Latest revision as of 17:59, 11 October 2007
This To Do box is only for controversial issues that still need to be to be resolved - see here for more information. Once an item has resolved please strike out using <strike> function.
*Add fact tags where citations are still needed
Summarize reading controversy, reduce long quotes (if possible without excluding relevant material)- Review the WP:NPOV and applicability to the current article.
Prepare an RfC for more editors to review the article.