| Revision as of 22:57, 14 October 2007 editClean Copy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,189 edits Policy← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:01, 14 October 2007 edit undoClean Copy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,189 edits more than 3 reverts can lead to a blockNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| I can't see any justification for including references to this unpublished work. Have you read the above-mentioned policy? I think that after you've been around Misplaced Pages longer you'll see how much sense it makes. ] 22:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | I can't see any justification for including references to this unpublished work. Have you read the above-mentioned policy? I think that after you've been around Misplaced Pages longer you'll see how much sense it makes. ] 22:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
| By the way, you are already in violation of the ] and will probably be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages for some period of time if you revert again!!! This is a friendly warning; I imagine you're new here. ] 23:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:01, 14 October 2007
Original research
Your interesting addition to the reincarnation page does not appear to meet the guidelines for verifiability. I suggest that you discuss on the article's talk page if you wish to pursue this (before adding it back, please!) Hgilbert 20:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
I can't see any justification for including references to this unpublished work. Have you read the above-mentioned policy? I think that after you've been around Misplaced Pages longer you'll see how much sense it makes. Hgilbert 22:57, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
By the way, you are already in violation of the limit on 3 reverts in 24 hours and will probably be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages for some period of time if you revert again!!! This is a friendly warning; I imagine you're new here. Hgilbert 23:01, 14 October 2007 (UTC)