| Revision as of 07:27, 22 May 2007 editDarthSidious (talk | contribs)780 editsm →Criticisms: That "criticism" had nothing to do with the book← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:35, 31 October 2007 edit undoHrafn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,179 edits Merge | ||
| (44 intermediate revisions by 19 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] {{R to section}} | |||
| {{Infobox Book | |||
| | name = The Case for a Creator | |||
| | image = ] | |||
| | author = ] | |||
| | language = ] | |||
| | subject = Christianity | |||
| | publisher = ]. | |||
| | release_date = ], ] | |||
| | pages = 352 | |||
| | isbn = 0310241448 | |||
| | preceded_by = ] | |||
| | followed_by = ] | |||
| }} | |||
| '''''The Case for a Creator: A Journalist Investigates Scientific Evidence that Points Towards God ''''' (2004) is a book by ] and former ] ] supporting the controversial notion of ]. In the book, Strobel conducts a series of investigative interviews of Christian scholars, all of whom are ID proponents, who attempt to refute ] accounts of the origin of universe and the development of life. | |||
| ==Contents== | |||
| Essentially, each body chapter consists of an interview with the expert(s) relevant to a particular field that claims to support the existence of a creator. The experts interviewed in the chapters and their topic(s) of discussion are as follows: | |||
| * ] presents a case against ] ]; | |||
| * ] discusses the relationship between ] and ], as well as the ], arguing against the likelihood of ] without the assistance of a creator; | |||
| * ] discusses the ] and argues for a creator as ], invoking the ]; | |||
| * ] discusses the ] and argues that the ] must be designed by a creator; | |||
| * ] & ] present a case that the ] supports ]; | |||
| * ] discusses ] in biology as evidence for a creator; and, | |||
| * ] examines the supposed existence of ] separate from the ], including ], as evidence for a creator. | |||
| ==Criticisms== | |||
| Critics point out that, although the book purports to investigate scientific evidence for a creator, of the experts interviewed, only Wells, Gonzalez, and Behe possess graduate degrees in a scientific field. The remainder have graduate qualifications in ] and ]. All of the experts interviewed are or have been in some way affiliated with the ], a conservative Christian think tank based in ], the main Intelligent Design hub.<ref>"Q. Has the Discovery Institute been a leader in the intelligent design movement? A. Yes, the Discovery Institute's Center for Science and Culture. Q. And are almost all of the individuals who are involved with the intelligent design movement associated with the Discovery Institute? A. All of the leaders are, yes." ], 2005, testifying in the ] trial. </ref> | |||
| Some critics also point out that the book assumes the ] ], though the arguments presented equally hold true for any ], ], and ] ] concept. {{Fact|date=February 2007}} | |||
| Some critics claim that much of the logic and analysis presented in the book, including the discussion of the Archaeopteryx, is flawed{{Fact|date=February 2007}} and presented in a biased view (it should, however, be noted that the book never presents itself as unbiased, as the title of the book is not The Case For and Against a Creator). Some critics also claim that new evidence brought to light also proves that the book's statement on ] concerning life on early Earth are possibly incorrect{{Fact|date=February 2007}}. | |||
| ==Also by Lee Strobel== | |||
| *'']'' | |||
| *'']'' | |||
| ==References and Notes== | |||
| <references/> | |||
| ==External links== | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| * By Paul Doland | |||
| ] | |||
| ] | |||
Latest revision as of 11:35, 31 October 2007
Redirect to:
- To a section: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to a section of a page on the subject. For redirects to embedded anchors on a page, use {{R to anchor}} instead.