| Revision as of 22:46, 2 November 2007 editBarneca (talk | contribs)16,070 edits →Unblock reviews: s'ok← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:20, 3 November 2007 edit undoLar (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators29,172 edits →Unblock reviews: rollback?Next edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| My mistake! I clicked the link and it went to your username, so I assumed it was you. I didn't bother to check the history. Thanks for the correction. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">] (])</span> 22:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC) | My mistake! I clicked the link and it went to your username, so I assumed it was you. I didn't bother to check the history. Thanks for the correction. <span style="background:#E0FFFF;color:#007FFF;font-family:Georgia;">] (])</span> 22:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :No worries. --] (]) 22:46, 2 November 2007 (UTC) | :No worries. --] (]) 22:46, 2 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::I think all the edits made by ] as an imposter of you either should be rolled back, or the signature changed to point to the real user. (this is an example of when, in my view anyway, it is permissible to change the words of others, when those words clearly were intended to decieve) Just stating that there's an imposter may not be the best approach for clarity. Rolling back completely might be best. ++]: ]/] 14:20, 3 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:20, 3 November 2007
Please Note:Where possible, I prefer to keep conversations together, to provide a clear record and to allow others to participate.
- If you are replying to a message I've left on your talk page, please respond on your talk page. I will have it on my watchlist.
- If you post something new here, I will reply on this page, so please keep this page on your watchlist.
If, for some reason, you'd like to do it differently, just make a note of that when you leave a message.
Note on email: Please feel free to email me if you prefer. Most days, I'll probably get back to you within a day, but it won't be as quick as using my talk page. It might go a little quicker if you leave me a note here that you've emailed me.
 Archives |
Impostor?
Do you have any relation to Barnecaration (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log) or is he/she an impostor? This user was going declining requests for unblocking and signing them with your name despite not being a Misplaced Pages:Administrator to begin with. -- Netsnipe ► 06:56, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page. Shorter version: not me. --barneca (talk) 11:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- (from their talk page) "I admit I took the persona of an established user however this was solely for the purpose of establishing a degree of authority". I have authority here?! I wish I'd known sooner. Now, I'm off to go boss some people around... --barneca (talk) 11:44, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Unblock reviews
My mistake! I clicked the link and it went to your username, so I assumed it was you. I didn't bother to check the history. Thanks for the correction. Nishkid64 (talk) 22:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- No worries. --barneca (talk) 22:46, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
- I think all the edits made by User:Barnecaration as an imposter of you either should be rolled back, or the signature changed to point to the real user. (this is an example of when, in my view anyway, it is permissible to change the words of others, when those words clearly were intended to decieve) Just stating that there's an imposter may not be the best approach for clarity. Rolling back completely might be best. ++Lar: t/c 14:20, 3 November 2007 (UTC)