Misplaced Pages

User talk:Alexandria: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:23, 4 November 2007 editButseriouslyfolks (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,752 edits The block: sorry, wrong user← Previous edit Revision as of 21:23, 4 November 2007 edit undo84.44.174.127 (talk) thx: new sectionNext edit →
Line 128: Line 128:


::Sounds good to me, however, I did not provoke. :) Best, !!!! {{unsigned|Mercury|20:30, 4 November 2007}} ::Sounds good to me, however, I did not provoke. :) Best, !!!! {{unsigned|Mercury|20:30, 4 November 2007}}

== thx ==

Thanks for extending my block. I think it was the right way to go. ] 21:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:23, 4 November 2007

Pages are archived after 50 or so headers and no active convos. Previous archives: Archive 1, Archive 2, Archive 3

I'll respond to comments on your page, usually using Re: your header.

hay

So is u that keeps deleting my section of the warren, mi article —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Home Slice7 (talkcontribs) 23:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

well

yea but i live in warren. what do u mean by source do u wanna a picture a website some thing like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Home Slice7 (talkcontribs) 23:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

A little award for your work

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your hard work on combating vandals, and your hard work in general
--Excirial 18:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC))

I'm surprised that you didn't receive one of these yet, since you certainly earn one. Keep up the good work, and think about placing your barnstars somewhere on your user page, instead of your talk archives :) --Excirial 18:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocking vandals

Thank you for making a report about 209.96.105.20 (talk · contribs · block log) on Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Misplaced Pages and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! --Moonriddengirl 18:43, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocking vandal

Dear Kwsn, I believe that user should be blocked. S/he is persistently vandalising the entry on Maria Gaetana Agnesi. Kind regards, --BF 01:04, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Further to the above message, please also block this one: . Kind regards, --BF 13:37, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, I mistook you as an administrator --- your comment attached to your yesterday's reversion gave me this false impression. Kind regards, --BF 17:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Adminship

Congratulations, you are now an administrator! Now is the time to visit the Misplaced Pages:New admin school and, if you haven't already, to look through the Misplaced Pages:Administrators' how-to guide and Misplaced Pages:Administrators' reading list. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or at the Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard. Warofdreams talk 00:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations - well deserved sir! Ryan Postlethwaite 00:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
A congratulations from me as well. Here is your new T-shirt! :) Acalamari 00:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
The admins' T-shirt. Acalamari 00:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
You know where to ask if you need help with anything ;). Congratulations! Nihiltres 00:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Congrats dear! Love, Neranei (talk) 01:19, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
No problem and congrats for being an admin.--JForget 01:25, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Great job!   jj137 (Talk) 01:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Congrats I'm glad Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 02:03, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Congrats! Good luck :) SQL 04:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations

Hey there Alexandria, Congratulations on becoming an administrator. Obviously, it is unlikely that you will know how to use the tools at first and mistakes are bound to happen, so if you would like to practice using them, with step by step guides to follow, in an environement that you can do no harm in, then why not pop down to the new admin school where we have pages on blocking, deleting and restoring pages, protecting and unprotecting pages and viewing deleted pages. Once again, congratulations and best of luck with the tools. Ryan Postlethwaite 00:34, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Ditto

Glad you've made admin! My ignorant advice? (Ignorant because I'm not an admin.) Make sure you take breaks from the project as needed. Rested and alert admins are much better than grumpy and snappish ones. Pigman/trail 02:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Kwsn - Congrats anyway (though I was no help to that) seriously, if/when you do want to polish something up for GA or even FA, I'll be happy to chip in. Putting effort into writing gives more thought when deleting..cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:03, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Not to mention writing articles is actually quite fun. Seeing an anon correct a typo in your text or collaborating with others to improve an article beyond what you could do individually are things that shouldn't be missed out on. I'll stop now and add my congrats as well! I'm glad it passed! henriktalk 06:38, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations! Well done for passing. Yes, if you take note of the points brought up in your RfA, I'm sure you will be a fine admin. Well done. Lradrama 13:36, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Pile-on congratulations. Please at least try to work on my comments there, as well as the advice made by the users above me, which is actually quite good :-) Happy editing! --Agüeybaná 21:42, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Yay kwsn!

trey has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Congratulations and good luck! /me huggles —trey 23:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Cris P

Not that I have a major problem with it or anything, but I am curious why you declined the speedy on Cris P. You failed to note a reason when you removed it. Improbcat 18:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

I apologize for adding the speedy a second time. As soon as I realized that it had been declined, I tried to revert it, but you beat me to it. Jauerback 19:29, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

IP 206.40.96.71

Isn't really vandalizing? look at the history for Bryan Adams (wrestler) they keep reverting to "...he became a bodyguard for his boyfriend..." when he wasn't gay...if I'm not mistaken he was married (to a woman lol) --Crash Underride 20:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Ok just wonderin'. --Crash Underride 15:18, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

this deletion

I noticted that you deleted this article under A1, and I tagged it as G1(patent nonsense) Sorry. It was only one sentence, and seemed like nonsense to me, but I realize now that A1 was more accurate in that situation.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. 01:04, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Quick Favor

Hey would you mind clearing the backlog (well there are only 3 reports, but they have been there like 30 mins) from WP:AIV? Thanks, Tiptoety 06:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Never mind, thanks! Tiptoety 06:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Kwsn's Corollary to Geogre's Law

Um, isn't that actually the same thing? :-) - (), 08:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much kwsn

Btw, how did you know I was a kid? I'll be 11 next month Botnet 22:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

My recent RfA

Thank you for participating in my recent RfA. Although the voting ended at 36/22/5, there was no consensus to promote, and the RfA was unsuccessful. I would like the thank you nonetheless for supporting me during the RfA, and hope that any future RfA’s proceed better than this one did. Again, I thank you for your support. ≈ The Haunted Angel Review Me! 02:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Email

I fired you one. Cheers, Daniel 10:33, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:UAA report

Hi Kwsn, saw you also re-removed a bad UAA report by User:SqueakBox. Check out his talk page. Why do you think there's this bizarre insistence that 'smartypants' is disruptive? ~Eliz81 18:25, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Ban of my account User:NotSarenne

Would you please justify why exactly you blocked my account? What "evidence" do you believe to have? Would you also please justify why you did not ban User:Fnagaton albeit he was definitely been convicted of sock puppetry? I mean what gives you the right to apply double standards? Have you actually verified his recent contributions and those of Marty Goldberg? Please, be so fair and look at their commit summaries and also the actual difference. You'll see these two have a personal vendetta against me. See also Talk:MB. That alone should show you that I was not making false accusations. Why do you let these two get away? Are you simply not aware of their hostility? I'll say it again: I did absolutely nothing that would justify a block. I am not a sock puppet. I have never ever resorted to such tactics and certainly do not plan it either. --217.87.59.247 18:27, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Continuing to edit under other ip's when your main account is blocked is not allowed on Misplaced Pages. This user has also just posted a comment here as well. --Marty Goldberg 18:33, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm quite sure if that's really disallowed, Kwsn knows that very well himself. Dear, Marty Goldberg, I do not see why think you have to interfere when I am trying to talk to Kwsn. Seriously, does nobody here see what you are doing to me and what kind of game you are a playing? You have succeeded in getting me blocked despite I have not done what I am accused of. Is that still not enough for you? --217.87.59.247 19:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Accusations aside (Nowhere did I type the words requesting a block, in fact it was given in your own request thread by the admin's responding to your original request), I was addressing you, not Kwsn. The only place you're allowed to edit when blocked is your own talk page. That means not here either, and not User_talk:FisherQueen and not . This behavior, combined with your previous statement flaunting people's inability to block you "You're not going to ban me this way because it's child's play to circumvent such a silly ban" is simply proving why these admins were justified in blocking you. --Marty Goldberg 19:14, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
I hope Kwsn can still speak for himself. I kindly ask you to not interfere further. --217.87.59.247 19:46, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

The block

Hi. Would you consider changing that extension to 72 hours, I think one week is a bit long considering the block log. If you choose not to change the duration, I'll support you either way. Best, Mercury 20:28, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

If I see he was provoked, probably, if it was unprovoked then I probably won't reduce it. Kwsn (Ni!) 20:29, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Sounds good to me, however, I did not provoke.  :) Best, !!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mercury (talkcontribs) 20:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

thx

Thanks for extending my block. I think it was the right way to go. 84.44.174.127 21:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)