| Revision as of 17:53, 5 November 2007 editWobble (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,640 edits →African diaspora: please observe the list of rules you are currently breaching← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:58, 5 November 2007 edit undoFuturebird (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,612 edits →African diasporaNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| If you are not careful you will get blocked very soon for this sort of behaviour. All the best. ] 17:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | If you are not careful you will get blocked very soon for this sort of behaviour. All the best. ] 17:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Your remarks on the talk page== | |||
| ''From your personality, I figure you WOULD include them, just to push your POV about racial miscegenation which is your political schadenfreude.'' | |||
| You think it's a turn of ''misfortune'' that white americans have black ancestry...? WOW. That is a very racist thing to say. I'm not even going to mince word about it. You're remarks are racist and you are wasting the time of editors who have better things to do without presenting any new information other than your own personal, unsupported, racist opinions. I thought I might have misunderstood the intent of you remarks earlier, but now I'm certain. I find your remarks hostile, degrading and uncivil. In the future please limit your discussion to the subject at hand. OK? ] 17:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:58, 5 November 2007
African diaspora
1. Calm down. One revert is not an insult to your mother or whatever. 2. I'm leaving it alone because I honestly don't have the time. So do whatever you guys agree with. CJ 02:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
- So if it was convenient, you would engage in an edit war? Nice revelation! Savignac 02:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
I think you seriously need to calm down and stop making assumptions. I told you once that I was staying out of this issue. I've already stated my position. CJ 02:33, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
My responses to your attitude are appropriate, considering the nature of your edits and the topics you circulate about. Apart from this particular part of the article that sounds outlandish, I'm not interested in race-related articles. The article presented a different tone than http://www.answers.com/miscegenation does, about race in North America, but the melting pot article also shows this side of the topic, that American demographics aren't "shades of gray", as the "love train" would have it, even if there has been admixture. Savignac 02:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Please refrain from engaging in edit warring. You are editing against consensus and are introducing your own personal opinion into Misplaced Pages. Currently you are in breach of several Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines, namely.
I suggest you learn to accept that you cannot push your own opinion in Misplaced Pages, you need to verify your claims from reliable sources. If you cannot do this, then you have to accept what other reliable sources claim, even if you do not agree with these sources. There is such a thing as aaccepting you are wrong gracefully you know.
If you are not careful you will get blocked very soon for this sort of behaviour. All the best. Alun 17:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Your remarks on the talk page
From your personality, I figure you WOULD include them, just to push your POV about racial miscegenation which is your political schadenfreude.
You think it's a turn of misfortune that white americans have black ancestry...? WOW. That is a very racist thing to say. I'm not even going to mince word about it. You're remarks are racist and you are wasting the time of editors who have better things to do without presenting any new information other than your own personal, unsupported, racist opinions. I thought I might have misunderstood the intent of you remarks earlier, but now I'm certain. I find your remarks hostile, degrading and uncivil. In the future please limit your discussion to the subject at hand. OK? futurebird 17:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)