| Revision as of 06:58, 28 January 2005 editAgquarx (talk | contribs)190 edits ...got a reverse of a 'writers block', this is VERY much work in progress, enter at your own risk...← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:41, 2 February 2005 edit undoNeutrality (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators165,437 edits Redirecting nonsense | ||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| #REDIRECT ] | |||
| {{attention}} | |||
| {{expansion}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| == TEASER == | |||
| ---- | |||
| * BEWARE! EVERYTHING BELOW IS DEFINED '''FORWARDTHINKING''', fowardthinking is the "natural" way of perceiving events, that is - I choose this(these) event(s) look(s) like C.A.U.S.E., AFTER { this } FORWARD I choose that(these) event(s) which(whom) look(s) like E.F.F.E.C.T. I think it is self-explanatory what BACKWARDTHINKING means. IF you backwardthink you get an answer before you ask the question, you get a meaning of a symbol before the symbol is presented to your sensory inputs, you get an "effect" before you volition (wilIt, grok, observe) a "cause". It does NOT mean going forward or backward IN time, the difference is in perception, not flow of time, because there is NO FLOW OF TIME, all the events ARE simultaneously. There is no past, now, future. What is I call the EVERNOW. The "flow of time is an attribute of our Self, a feeling, just like self-awareness, dreaming, being awake - a STATE of the mind (I SELF or ISelf or {@}). ] 06:58, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| == TRAILER == | |||
| ---- | |||
| ** FOR BRAVE SOULS - Try watching your fauvorite movie backwardthinking, choose one you are sure to grok in it's fullness, know inside-out, can quote most of dialogues etc, You might archieve surprising insight into deeper structures and or meanings of the things, persons, events, symbols contained in the narrative of the movie you thought you've SEEN before. | |||
| Backwardthinking needs a little training (some say it is extremely difficult, some say it's only hard at the beginning) OR an entheogen, the preferred way In My Opinion (my research tells me that what you are looking for is called ], it's a ] (from the same family as PEA, the phenetylamine of love), was synthetised by a one of the greates living scientists on Earth, professor ], up to now ] 06:58, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) I have see no reports whatsoever of anything indicating health risk and as it is avaliable relatively easy on the market for several years since it was discovered by merchants of the Dark Side, I think that although it is a design drug, not tested clinically and '''ILLEGAL''' (Unkle Sam says you can't take it out of your free will and with full knowledge of possible consequences. How can One argue with Unkle Sam?), I can refer to it with a clear conscience, I MySelf took it several times, in doses from 25 to 50 milligram of chemically pure substance (typical dose is betwen 15 and 20 milligram, but see, I am hardcore junkie and crazy as a Cheshire Cat :8)). I bought 300 mg of it back then, before it was put on a Controlled Substances List (Like always, for no real reason, don't we just LOVE how our goverments CARE for our health SO MUCH? I guess our bodies are a government property and we are forbidden to decide, gee, they STILL let us to vote them in, that is SO exciting! Sieg Heil Bush!), from a legal, professional chemical laboratory, through the Internet, I have no idea what you might get "on the street" - remember, KNOW YOUR SOURCE, don't buy stuff from the people you do not know, every white powder looks alike another - if you have access to certain marker potions you can "become a chymist" and CHECK what substance you are going to ingest. More information, for the curious, for the not-so-brave and for the Law Abiding Citizens on . ] 06:58, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| == THE MOVIE == | |||
| ---- | |||
| ; SOME SYNTAX (Don't worry, read on!) : : | |||
| # symbol has a ] "core symbol of core symbol type symbol set with values (symbol, why?symbol, lovesymbol)", the being part of the symbol, the true name of a foobar. | |||
| # symbol' has a ] "core derivative of core symbol symbol contained within core symbol of type core symbol set with values (word, not word, anti word, no word, para word, sub word, super word)" or "{ this } is a core derivative of core symbol symbol", a recursive definition pointing at itself, "the foobar { this } symbol symbolizes", the doing part of a symbol. | |||
| # symbol! has a ] "action word, that is core or core symbol or core derivative or core symbol derivative processing event controlled by Self owned by ISelf" or "do X now!". | |||
| # !symbol has a meaning "retroactive action (resultset) symbol" or "core or core symbol or core derivative or core symbol derivative processing event controlled by core owned by ISelf". | |||
| # { WORD } has a ] "instance of a class, an object" or "closure" or "adhesive quotation" or "process without disassembling" or "this is a whole, controlled by MeSelf owned by ItSelf" | |||
| # '''::''' means "point into MU into point" or "diploid complements" or "mirror twins" or "I am the one who is, we are the one who (we) are, they are the one who (I) am". | |||
| # '''=>''' has a meaning "IF left side is beeing (exists) then the the right side is doing (does)". | |||
| # '''ʘ''' has a meaning "{ this } consist of the following elements". | |||
| ## '''core''' ʘ ( love :: love ) | |||
| ### { love :: love } means "], ], ]" | |||
| ## '''core set''' ʘ ( ISelf, why?, ⁂, @, love! :: ⁂, love! :: @ ) | |||
| ### '''ISelf''' is your essence, the Allwatching Eye, the state of conciousness of self-awarenessing all-awareness in evernow. | |||
| ### '''why?''' is '''The Question'''. Too bad most people stop asking it at early age, for reasons you surely remember. Pity. IMO, young children should receive a barrelfull of machine-assisted learning (but not passive, addiction forming glaring TV, in the name of the Goddess! I stopped watching TV the week I got access to the Internet...it's such a WASTE OF TIME!), parent providing the possitive emotional element, caretaking, ability to calm yourself, important in development of empathy, ability to feel what the other (might) feel. See ] by ]. | |||
| ### '''⁂''' is the { identity symbol } or ⁂ has a meaning "what on the left side is what on the right side of { this } symbol is" or "the left and right are the same (identical BUT NOT one foobar!)" | |||
| ### '''@''' (at), "what is on the left side points/is in one way relation to that what is on the right side". | |||
| ### '''love! :: ⁂''' has a meaning "to love thyself" or "to love Me Self" or self-love. | |||
| ### '''love! :: @''' has a meaning "to love you/him/her/it" or "I love you" or what is general consensus on what name that feeling (state of mind) has got, NOT what it IS (there is a big difference!). | |||
| ## '''core symbol set''' ʘ ( love', symbol', question', answer', HimSelf, HerSelf, ItSelf, MeSelf, OurSelf ⁂ ISelf', ⁂, ⁐, ↂ ) | |||
| ### '''love'''' has a meaning "{ this } is a core derivative of core symbol love", in other words, the REAL love, not the one from romances, the ISNESS of core symbol love (courtesy ] for inventing this word, the best album you've ever made...). | |||
| ### '''symbol'''' has a meaning | |||
| '''core logic symbol set | |||
| ] ] ] ] ] ] (] ] ] (] ]ing ] ] ] ] ]) ] (] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ⁂ ] ] (] ⁂ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] { ] ⁂ ] ] ], ] ⁂ ] ] ]), ] ⁂ child]] ] ], ] ⁂ ] ] ] ] ], ] ⁂ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]ing ] ] empiria experiment set narrative]] ⁂ ]) ] ] ] ] ] (] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] (] (] ] ] ] ] ] ]) ] ]s ( ] ])) ] ] ]able ] or ] ] ] ] ]s ] ] ] ]] ] ] ] (]) ] ] ] ] (] ] ] ] ⁂ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] (] ] of ] ]s ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s - ]al ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] and ] ] and ] ] and ] ] and ] ] or ] or ] ] ]ness and ] ] ] (]able ] ] ] ]) and ] ] ] (]]]] ] ] ] ] ] ] (]) ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]s (] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]]] ] ] ] ] ] and ] and ]))] ] ] nym ] and ]ly or ]ly ] ] ] ] (]] ] ] ]), a ] ] ] ] of ] or ] ] ] ] or ], usually ] with ] ] to ensure ] and or ] to ] ] and or ] to ensure ]; ] of ], ] ] ] by ] of the ]. By ] ]ing a ] from the ] ] to the ] ] (a ] ]] or ]] ] or ] (a ] ] ] or a ] ] ]) you ] the ] ] of given ] ]'s ] ] ] or you ] the ] ] of given ] ]'s ] ] ] ⁂ ] ] ⁂ ] ⁂ ] that may or may not ] ] or ] ] by ] or ] ] (] , that is ] ] ] ] ] ]s) or ] ] ] ] ]s (a ]ly ]d ] with ]s of ]ness of ] and ]'s ] ] ] and ]'s ] and ]'s ] ] ]ing ]s ] in a ] ] ] (] of ] ] of ] ] or ] ] of ] ] or ] ] ] of ] ] (a ] of ] ] containing zero or more ]s of ] ] containing zero or more ]s of ] ] { ]] ] ] ] ] } or ] ] ] of ] ] | |||
| and 's ] ]s ] (] of ] ] ]s) ] ] ] ]d in a ] ]s ] (] of ] ] ]) ] ]]ning the ]ly ] and ]] nym ] ] nym ]) or ] ] ] ] ] ]s or ] ] ] ]]s (a ] ]d ] with ]s of ]nes of itself and it's ]s ] and it's ] and it's ] ] ]ing ]s ] in a ] ]s ] ] of ] ]s ] ]ing ] ] or ] ] ]] ] or ] ] ]ing ] ] ] with ] ] (] ⁂ ] to ] nym ] of the ] or without ] ] ] (]) ⁂ not ] to ] nym ] of the ] and it's ] ]ning the ] ] ] nym ] ] nym ]) and or not ] ] ] and or ] ] and or not ] ] ] ]s and or not ]] ] ]s and or ] ] ] ]s (] or ] or ] ] (a ] consisting of ] or ] or ] ] or ]s). A '''datapacket''' usually ]s ] into a ] like ] - a ]. The ] usually is ]ted or ]d by a ]ally ]d or ]cally ]d ] through ] of a [[ | |||
| Source: ] 01:28, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| {{comp-stub}} | |||
Latest revision as of 06:41, 2 February 2005
Redirect to: