| Revision as of 16:34, 24 November 2007 editCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:36, 24 November 2007 edit undoSennen goroshi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,008 edits Undid revision 173504207 by Appletrees (talk)Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Hi, please read ]. You're arguing that a living person is noted for their animal cruelty, when all mentions to it are in reference to his films, and even then, aren't the main part of the articles. I'm just saying he's not mainly known for his animal cruelty, and while mentioning it in the article is all fine, you seem to feel that most people would associate the person with animal cruelty, which simply isn't the case. Please find a source that specifically states that he's a well-known and noted animal abuser if you're going to claim that in an encyclopedia article, otherwise, please be careful in your wording when it comes to biographies of living people. Thanks. - ] (]) 16:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC) | Hi, please read ]. You're arguing that a living person is noted for their animal cruelty, when all mentions to it are in reference to his films, and even then, aren't the main part of the articles. I'm just saying he's not mainly known for his animal cruelty, and while mentioning it in the article is all fine, you seem to feel that most people would associate the person with animal cruelty, which simply isn't the case. Please find a source that specifically states that he's a well-known and noted animal abuser if you're going to claim that in an encyclopedia article, otherwise, please be careful in your wording when it comes to biographies of living people. Thanks. - ] (]) 16:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==The reverting== | |||
| Now are you really done with chasing me and starting ignoring me huh? I don't believe so. I'll prepare your unexpected action in future like you've been doing to me per your history. The director is also one of my strong interests. Why don't you rather add more information in order to balance the article in general instead of revealing your strong anti-Kim Ki-duk sentiment, whatever. --] (]) 16:34, 24 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:36, 24 November 2007
| 15:48 Saturday 11 January 2025
Please click here to leave a new message for me Kim Ki-dukHi, please read WP:BLP. You're arguing that a living person is noted for their animal cruelty, when all mentions to it are in reference to his films, and even then, aren't the main part of the articles. I'm just saying he's not mainly known for his animal cruelty, and while mentioning it in the article is all fine, you seem to feel that most people would associate the person with animal cruelty, which simply isn't the case. Please find a source that specifically states that he's a well-known and noted animal abuser if you're going to claim that in an encyclopedia article, otherwise, please be careful in your wording when it comes to biographies of living people. Thanks. - Bobet (talk) 16:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC) |