Misplaced Pages

Talk:Kraków Old Town: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:03, 28 November 2007 editPoeticbent (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers29,717 edits opp← Previous edit Revision as of 18:25, 28 November 2007 edit undoMatthead (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers21,271 edits →Move?Next edit →
Line 11: Line 11:


::::Bad idea. Unilateral split which makes no sense, since it is all about one and the same place. We don't need two separate stubs, both created as inflammatory by a single user. No discussion. Unacceptable. --] ] 16:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC) ::::Bad idea. Unilateral split which makes no sense, since it is all about one and the same place. We don't need two separate stubs, both created as inflammatory by a single user. No discussion. Unacceptable. --] ] 16:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

::::: Violating ] and ] once again, Poeticbent? And ]? Tell your grievances to the editors who keep ] and inofficial ] separate from political ]. An Administrative District is not a world heritage site, neither in Cracow nor in Warsaw. Thus, two articles linking to the each other.-- ] ]  18:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:25, 28 November 2007

WikiProject iconPoland Stub‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

About largest european square: Freedom Square, Kharkiv --Yonkie 19:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Move?

Per Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (use English) this article should be at Kraków Old Town, like bunches of other old towns. I hope there is no need to go thru Misplaced Pages:Requested moves. Renata 04:56, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Last chance to comment... Renata 05:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
I see your point, however, "Stare Miasto" is the name of the Administrative District No. I of Kraków. The remaining seventeen districts of Kraków have not been anglicized. Take as an example Nowa Huta, District No. XVIII of Kraków. The corresponding article is not slated to be renamed to New Steel-mill. I suggest you look at the main article and perhaps wait for more feedback from our community. --Poeticbent talk 15:15, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
For UNESCO, its Cracow's Historic Centre (new article there now). For the political district, keep this here, under whatever name. -- Matthead  DisOuß   15:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Bad idea. Unilateral split which makes no sense, since it is all about one and the same place. We don't need two separate stubs, both created as inflammatory by a single user. No discussion. Unacceptable. --Poeticbent talk 16:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Violating WP:AGF and WP:NPA once again, Poeticbent? And WP:OWN? Tell your grievances to the editors who keep Warsaw Old Town and inofficial Category:Neighbourhoods of Warsaw separate from political Category:Boroughs of Warsaw. An Administrative District is not a world heritage site, neither in Cracow nor in Warsaw. Thus, two articles linking to the each other.-- Matthead  DisOuß   18:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Categories: