Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 04:56, 3 December 2007

Thank you for experimenting with the page Asiaphile on Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 04:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. NickCwik 23:27, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

3RR Violation

You have violated the three-revert rule, as you have reverted the same article four times in one day. This warrants a 24-hour block. I urge you to stop reverting this article, or I will report you. Thank you. —Christopher Mann McKay 03:51, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

One minute after I posted this, you reverted Asian fetish for the fifth time today. I am going to assume good faith and assume you did not see this comment before you reverted it. If you do not revert the article back to its previous state, before you reverted, I will report you. —Christopher Mann McKay 03:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

you reverted twice and Kaiten many more times. Now what are you going to do? Let me guess go running to another computer and do it anonymously? Non-asian men obsessively trying to make asian fetish into a positive? Come one we all know what you are.

I am not trying to do anything. Your edits are inappropriate and are not in par with Misplaced Pages policies.—Christopher Mann McKay 04:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

So you use Kaiten as a way to skirt around the 3rr rule and you are trying to make asian fetish, a racist term, into something like a harmless shoe fetish. Asian are not like shoes, clothing, etc. We are people. Not things that exist for you to define and for your pleasure. I've included an arguments against asian fetish section and this is where your material belongs. Or create another section but do not redefine Asian Fetish with isolated opinionated articles when the overwhelming majority of the references contradicts them. Tkguy (talk) 05:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

{{unblock|First off I was not aware of the 3 revert rule. Being new to the wikipedia editing. If you look at Christopher Mann McKay's talk page you will see that the guy have been vandalizing a lot of pages. He removed and deleted content from Campus Watch (a pro-Jewish think tank). He deleted accusation of anti-gay actions made by the AFA (American Family Association) from the AFA page. And he deletes much of the content off the Asian Fetish page too. He seemed to have teamed up with Kaitenbushi to skirt the 3 revert rule. The two took turn to make sure the page only contained the bare minimum material that adhere to their notion of what asian fetish is. If you look at the Asian Fetish page there have been many many people deleting any and all entries that makes Asian Fetish something negative. Please note that another user Kaitenbushi violated the 3 revert rule as well. Chistopher stopped at 2. Obviously Christopher knew what he was doing and IMO he was leading me on.Tkguy (talk) 02:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)}}

I am strongly considering unblocking you (since you are relatively new and you weren't warned before the third revert as you should have been, but I have contacted the blocking admin for her opinion. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): After discussing this with the blocking admin, I've decided to unblock you. Please be mindful of our policies on the three revert rule and edit warring. Request handled by: east.718 at 04:07, November 30, 2007

Thanks Tkguy (talk) 04:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Tkguy, after reading your request and looking deeper into the history, I saw that you were indeed correct that you were not the only user to violate the 3RR policy. After some consideration, I believe it best that all involved be able to continue editing, however, the article in which this dispute has taken place is now fully protected. Any changes must first be discussed on the article's talk page. Once a consensus has been reached, an admin can make those changes. As I stated on that page, if a revert war resumes after the protection has been lifted, then there will be blocks. I hope that can be avoided, and please feel free to contact me if you need assistance. Best regards, Lara❤Love 04:16, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for unblocking me LaraLove. I am concerned that the version of the Asian Fetish page that is now protected is the one that Christopher Mann McKay has been working on for a long time. Is it possible that we start with the version of the page that he is trying to revert from? I think it's a more objective version of the page and a much better point to start from. It has all the entries Chris supports but it does not however let them define Asian fetish by putting them as the first sentences on the page. Here's the version I am proposing to use 07:51, 29 November 2007 . I will put this entry on the talk page for Asian Fetish when I am unblocked. I am still block as of now. Tkguy (talk) 04:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Discuss it on the article's talk page. Personally, the current version doesn't read very NPOV to me, but I haven't read through the topic to get more familiar with it. Start talking it out there. Let me know if it goes no where. Lara❤Love 13:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

I've put my request on the talk page and was told that it's not valid. I've rewrote my request for individual edits on the talk page. Seems like my requests are being ignored. Is there something I am doing wrong in the way I am going about for asking the blocked contributer's content be changed? Tkguy 04:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Improvements

Hi Tkguy. I think you are on the right tack with this article, though there are clearly some aspects that need to be improved and gaps to be filled. I have some extra info and would like to hear your views on it, so send me an email and we can improve constructive editing. Aberdeenharbour (talk) 07:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)