| Revision as of 22:03, 22 November 2007 edit124.186.83.250 (talk) Restore blanked← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:55, 5 December 2007 edit undo121.223.64.241 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ⚫ | According to Michael First M.D. of the the locus of a relational ], in contrast to other ] disorders, "is on the relationship rather than on any one individual in the relationship." <ref>First, Michael B. M.D.</ref> | ||
| Relational disorders involve 2 or more individuals and a disordered "juncture," whereas typical Axis I psychopathology describes a disorder at the individual level. An additional criterion for a relational disorder is that the disorder cannot be due solely to a problem in one member of the relationship, but requires pathological interaction from each of the individuals involved in the relationship.<ref>First, Michael B. M.D.</ref> For example, if a parent is withdrawn from one child but not another, the dysfunction could be attributed to a relational disorder. In contrast, if a parent is withdrawn from both children, the dysfunction may be more appropriately attributable to a disorder at the individual level.<ref>Jerrold F. Rosenbaum, MD Rachel Pollock, PhD </ref> | |||
| ⚫ | <br />Dr. First states that "relational disorders share many elements in common with other disorders: there are distinctive features for ]; they can cause clinically significant impairment; there are recognizable clinical courses and patterns of ]; they respond to specific treatments; and they can be prevented with early interventions. Specific tasks in a proposed research agenda: develop assessment modules; determine the clinical utility of relational disorders; determine the role of relational disorders in the ] and maintenance of individual disorders; and consider aspects of relational disorders that might be modulated by individual disorders."<ref>First, Michael B. M.D.</ref> The proposed new diagnosis defines a relational disorder as "persistent and painful patterns of feelings, behaviors, and perceptions" among two or more people in an important personal relationship, such a husband and wife, or a parent and children.<ref name=sj>Smith, Michael, | ||
| ⚫ | According to the |
||
| ⚫ | |||
| </ref> | </ref> | ||
| <br /> | <br /> | ||
Revision as of 23:55, 5 December 2007
According to Michael First M.D. of the DSM-V working committee the locus of a relational disorder, in contrast to other DSM-IV disorders, "is on the relationship rather than on any one individual in the relationship."
Relational disorders involve 2 or more individuals and a disordered "juncture," whereas typical Axis I psychopathology describes a disorder at the individual level. An additional criterion for a relational disorder is that the disorder cannot be due solely to a problem in one member of the relationship, but requires pathological interaction from each of the individuals involved in the relationship. For example, if a parent is withdrawn from one child but not another, the dysfunction could be attributed to a relational disorder. In contrast, if a parent is withdrawn from both children, the dysfunction may be more appropriately attributable to a disorder at the individual level.
Dr. First states that "relational disorders share many elements in common with other disorders: there are distinctive features for classification; they can cause clinically significant impairment; there are recognizable clinical courses and patterns of comorbidity; they respond to specific treatments; and they can be prevented with early interventions. Specific tasks in a proposed research agenda: develop assessment modules; determine the clinical utility of relational disorders; determine the role of relational disorders in the etiology and maintenance of individual disorders; and consider aspects of relational disorders that might be modulated by individual disorders." The proposed new diagnosis defines a relational disorder as "persistent and painful patterns of feelings, behaviors, and perceptions" among two or more people in an important personal relationship, such a husband and wife, or a parent and children.
According to psychiatrist Darrel Regier, MD, some psychiatrists and other therapists involved in couples and marital counseling have recommended that the new diagnosis be considered for possible incorporation into the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV).
See also
Blatner, Adam M.D.Thinking about the diagnosis of Relational Disorders
Notes
- First, Michael B. M.D.A Research Agenda for DSM-V: Summary of the DSM-V Preplanning White Papers Published in May 2002
- First, Michael B. M.D.A Research Agenda for DSM-V: Summary of the DSM-V Preplanning White Papers Published in May 2002
- Jerrold F. Rosenbaum, MD Rachel Pollock, PhD DSM V -- Plans and Perspectives, Medscape 2002
- First, Michael B. M.D.A Research Agenda for DSM-V: Summary of the DSM-V Preplanning White Papers Published in May 2002
- ^ Smith, Michael, Is Your Relationship a Disorder? Review of "Spouse Joust", by Richard Trubo