| Revision as of 00:08, 6 December 2007 editShadowbot3 (talk | contribs)51,520 editsm Automated archival of 4 sections to User talk:TJ Spyke/Archive 15← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:13, 6 December 2007 edit undoReswobslc (talk | contribs)3,364 editsm fix my linkNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 173: | Line 173: | ||
| Meltzer makes mistakes too and could have easily missed out on what exactly happened in the finish; you can't deny that possibility. I still recommend that you watch the match for yourself and see how you interpret the finish. If you don't have access to the match, it's up on sites like YouTube or Dailymotion. -] (]) 02:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC) | Meltzer makes mistakes too and could have easily missed out on what exactly happened in the finish; you can't deny that possibility. I still recommend that you watch the match for yourself and see how you interpret the finish. If you don't have access to the match, it's up on sites like YouTube or Dailymotion. -] (]) 02:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Nigel McGuinness == | |||
| TJ Spyke, I have opened up an ArbCom request regarding ] and have included you because you have contributed substantially to the debate at hand. It can be found at ] ] (]) 00:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:13, 6 December 2007
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:TJ Spyke/Archive 15. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
Royal Rumble
I never added that it was from WWE.com, someone else must have edited it. Vinyldestination (talk)
- Yeah, I noticed after I already left you the message. TJ Spyke 00:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Za
Uh, because za is the Japanese transliteration for "the" into their language. If the title was actually "Mario & Sonic at the Beijing Olympics", then the original title would be マリオ&ソニック AT ザ北京オリンピック. However, the actual title doesn't have ザ, so a straight translation shouldn't have the "the". ' 04:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the help!
Thank You for the help on the No Way Out (2004) article, as I am busy with that and the List of WWE Hardcore Champions article.--TrUcO9311 (talk) 22:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
List of WWE PPV's
I have NO idea how to make a citation, even with reading that. Can you do it for me? It's a special calendar insert that comes in the special WWE Magazine entitiled "The Greatest Moments in Pay-Per-View history". I just can't make heads or tails of the WP: CITE thing you gave me. WestJet (talk) 22:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Wrestling Pay-Per-View Events
So should I put all the PPV's into 1 sortable table, or break it into sections (and if so how? i.e. like by promotion or "current" and "former".--TrUcO9311 (talk) 22:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, that will look so great. Well are we going to include Ring of Honor? If so may you locate them for me. =]TrUcO9311 (talk) 23:09, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- So when you say include them with the others you mean like creathing another section entitled "Other Promotions", and the make a table there?--TrUcO9311 (talk) 23:21, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- Ok now for the refs, what kind of references do I add, like ones that prove the event was/is real?--TrUcO9311 (talk) 23:24, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
- So does it look gud? (already know about the misspelled word)--TrUcO9311 (talk) 00:47, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Should we add color to the tables or not? Also, do you think that SNME should be there?--TrUcO9311 (talk) 01:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- P.S. Its done NOW!..Just need refs but go check it out!TrUcO9311 (talk) 01:44, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Re:Image question
I have re-added the missing fair use rationale tag. I also left a note on his talk page, so hopefully, he'll heed my advice. Nishkid64 (talk) 02:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Dec. 3 deletion
RobJ deleted the Dec. 3 info. I think he's gonna keep a very close eye on the talk page, so I'm not sure we can post info anymore. Is there any way to prove him that those will be the games. Oh, he also said that this is not a fansite. Neo Samus 22:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
I wouldn't bother trying to talk him out of his "policy nazi" mode. Rob's a stubborn guy, and even if these games do come out on Monday, there's no real way of proving that our source didn't just get lucky at guessing. Again. Can I just have a link to the place you get this information, TJ? That way I won't have to rely on the talk page anymore. Thanks in advance! -Thores 23:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
- . Neo, i'm not sure if Rob will ever admit he is wrong (he is very stubborn and doesn't back down unles there is an overwhelming consensus against him). TJ Spyke 00:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Even when there is an overwhelming consensus against him its never stopped him. Sigh. Well if anything we'll hold off posting about dec. 3 and just wait till next week. Neo Samus 01:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC) EDIT: Never mind. You posted it again. LOL!
- I've already said that I was a bit annoyed at having that on the talk page, even if we have a lot of reason to believe that it's true. I actually really like the information, I only want to be careful. I know Rob is a pain. We've had tons of problems with Rob. And he sure knows how to quote policy, but not how to follow it. --LN3000 04:30, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- The December 3 section doesn't belong, as it's speculation from an unreliable source. Stop re-adding it. As for the rude comments: knock it off. Comment about the article, not editors. This behaviour isn't needed. RobJ1981 23:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- It's not speculation. It's confirmed information from a reliable source. He gets the PR release early so he can write reviews and have them ready to post on Monday morning. TJ Spyke 23:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Even when there is an overwhelming consensus against him its never stopped him. Sigh. Well if anything we'll hold off posting about dec. 3 and just wait till next week. Neo Samus 01:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC) EDIT: Never mind. You posted it again. LOL!
WP:PW newsletter
The newsletter is ready for proofreading. We are likely not to have any current events this week. The Chronic 00:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
 Issue III — December 2, 2007 | |
Project News
The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for December 2 - December 8 is Stone Cold Steve Austin. Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Misplaced Pages professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, December 9. |
Member News
Welcome to the third edition of the WP:PW newsletter. We need people to begin contacting us with current events. If you can think of anything taking place in the wrestling world that you feel should be added to the newsletter, as well as any other suggestions, then please let us know. Thanks everyone,
Contributors to this Issue:
|
Wrestlemania X8
Hmmm... the link must not be working well now... try doing a "Wayback Machine" search on www.wrestlemania.com and click on any of the dates after March 18, 2002. Then look through the Resuslts and see that they call him Hollywood Hulk Hogan, not just Hulk Hogan. Here's the link for the search:
And here's the link for the Rock/Hogan match result in case it works now: (Hopefully it will.) --Andresg770 23:35, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Cardinals proposal
It was silly of me to set up two surveys & discussions. Is ok with you if I delete both our votes at Talk:Cardinal, & just link to the other survey? Johnbod 23:40, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, I don't want to alter the templates now, so I'll just leave a link - same difference I think. Johnbod 00:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Comment
Calling me stubborn, as well as your false claims here: User_talk:Neo_Samus#VC_11.2F19 aren't needed. You need to work on articles, instead of attacking me and just assuming bad faith. You say I'm harassing you, but you are the one that is more to blame here. You need to just leave me the hell alone, and stop talking about me on talk pages just to make me look bad. Misplaced Pages is for editing and discussing articles, not bashing and insulting others. RobJ1981 00:13, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
No Way Out
I let that one through because it appeared to just be moving it to the correct line. My bad. Mshake3 23:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Friendly tip
You really should avoid calling users edits vandalism when it isn't. WP:PW changes it's mind on issues so often that it is hard to keep track and I thought that after all of the hoopla over Vengeance that we weren't supposed to add matches until both participants were announced. -- Scorpion 03:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 49 | 3 December 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
TNA Turning Point Knockouts Tag Finish
I don't have a play-by-play source that mentions the Russian legsweep, but unless you're looking at an official statement/recap from TNA, a play-by-play that neglects to mention the Russian legsweep doesn't change what you can actually see with your own eyes. I'm assuming your source is a play-by-play that was written while the match took place, so it's perfectly possible that the writer just wasn't paying attention or didn't notice. Unless I am incorrect about the nature of your source, I recommend you watch the match yourself to see how you interpret the match and the finish. -WikiFew (talk) 02:09, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Meltzer makes mistakes too and could have easily missed out on what exactly happened in the finish; you can't deny that possibility. I still recommend that you watch the match for yourself and see how you interpret the finish. If you don't have access to the match, it's up on sites like YouTube or Dailymotion. -WikiFew (talk) 02:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Nigel McGuinness
TJ Spyke, I have opened up an ArbCom request regarding Nigel McGuinness and have included you because you have contributed substantially to the debate at hand. It can be found at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration#Nigel_McGuinness Reswobslc (talk) 00:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)