Misplaced Pages

User talk:TastyPoutine: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:12, 2 December 2007 editTastyPoutine (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,289 edits cleanup← Previous edit Revision as of 02:23, 11 December 2007 edit undoKarmaisking (talk | contribs)963 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The delete machine is working on overdrive. I'm OK with the wholesale slaughter going on in the ] section (they had it coming to them) but the genocide that just happened on ] seems a little excessive. I'd be careful if I was you. The International War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague is still in existence despite the recent departure of the chief prosecutor. The only two book references included on ] have been torched. Please define "reference" book? How does a "normal" book differ from a "reference" book? Who decides (they are both published after all)? Surely now the article can be criticized as being "light on substance"? How do you counter that? With a web-based cartoon attached to the article? ], your hyperactive delete button needs less caffeine (or coke) and more ]. What are you afraid of? ] (]) 02:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:23, 11 December 2007

The delete machine is working on overdrive. I'm OK with the wholesale slaughter going on in the credit crunch section (they had it coming to them) but the genocide that just happened on debt money seems a little excessive. I'd be careful if I was you. The International War Crimes Tribunal in The Hague is still in existence despite the recent departure of the chief prosecutor. The only two book references included on debt money have been torched. Please define "reference" book? How does a "normal" book differ from a "reference" book? Who decides (they are both published after all)? Surely now the article can be criticized as being "light on substance"? How do you counter that? With a web-based cartoon attached to the article? Montco, your hyperactive delete button needs less caffeine (or coke) and more common sense. What are you afraid of? Karmaisking (talk) 02:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)