| Revision as of 01:41, 19 December 2007 editChrishmt0423 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,758 editsm Reverted 1 edit by 75.33.244.253 identified as vandalism to last revision by Chrishomingtang. using TW← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:41, 19 December 2007 edit undo75.33.244.253 (talk) Undid revision 178853935 by Chrishomingtang (talk)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Stop reverting correct additions, you stupid fucking faggot. | |||
| '''Welcome to Chrishomingtang Talk Page!''' | |||
| ] | |||
| {{User:Chrishomingtang/menu}} | |||
| {{busy}} | |||
| {| class="wikitable" style="background: skyblue; width:100%" | |||
| |Sorry, I am not available. Please leave me a message.''' | |||
| |} | |||
| <div style="position: absolute; bottom: 0em; right: 5px; font-size:95%;">'''Please sign by adding <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki> at the end of your message when you post here. Thanks.'''</div> | |||
| {{archives}} | |||
| == Hi chris... == | |||
| I think you should ] ] 04:39, 2 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :And I was visiting your userpage two months ago and said that you are anti-gun. I am currently creating a userbox for that. Do you want the template? If so, visit my userpage and pick it up, soon. -]]]]] 00:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Here you go: {{User:Goodshoped35110s/Userboxes/User anti-gun}} -]]]]] 01:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| === Re: Woods Division === | |||
| :I don't really care. Go right ahead and delete it, I don't even really know why I even created the article, I mean the title is wrong, and stuff, but some of the California and PH/PM cable cars were built in its carpentry division. -]]]]] 02:33, 31 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::And two other users have made edits to that article. -]]]]] 02:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| === Re: 38 Geary === | |||
| :The article was nominated for deletion '''once''' by ]. It was withdrawn when it was ] that the route was notable. If possible, you might as well redirect the page to '''B Geary'''. -]]]]] 01:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| === Re: Adopt-An-Alleyway Youth Empowerment Project === | |||
| :This organization is actually notable. I happen to know because I happen to be a member of this organization, which has been featured as a community hero over at Crissy Field (I think it's still there...), but, you probably never heard of it. It's been featured in the Chronicle (I think) twice, so people know about this youth organization, and it is a good club that can get people into college. I am not starting that article just for the spam thing, in fact, I do not intend to spam anyone here in Misplaced Pages, because that's what I do not do. So, anyway, I would like to tell you in a lengthy reply on how the AAA is notable, but, you probably know that Norman Fong started it in the 1990s as a recruitment for High School students (there's even a video of that in Youtube!), because back then people simply didn't give a care about the alleyways in Chinatown, nor were they even officially recognized as city streets. So, that's how it started, and we usually clean up every 2nd Saturday of the month, and they even run the Chinatown Alleyway Tours, which is a hit to tourists, and has been featured in ] one time. That's how notable it is. I'm just saying. :) Cheers, -]]]]] 04:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::And can you please give me a more detailed reason why other than the fact that it is "non notable". -]]]]] 05:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| === Your comment === | |||
| It says here that "I dislike people who destroy other's work." Well, I have a question, and it is '''not''' a personal attack, just to let you know. You've '''nominated three of my articles''' for '''deletion''' in the past two weeks! The first article was ], which I went ahead with, and the second article is the ], which I convinced you to redirect it to the ] page. Now, you're on ''']''', which I created. Now I want to know, are you doing this because of its notability, or are you trying to personally attack me? The comment I made is nothing personal, and it should not be mistaken for a personal attack. Thank you very much and have a great evening. <!--I live in the City too, just on the other side. --> -]]]]] 02:46, 11 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Hi chris (Justin Doerr)... == | |||
| I have been looking around Misplaced Pages and I have been getting information and re-editing it. The thing is I was reported for vandalizing an article by you when I was actually providing real information. it says in the San Jose article that the metro area has 1.8 million people but when I looked around and typed in San Francisco Bay Area which is considered a metropolitan area it says that there are 7.2 million people. you may be using sources from the U.S. census bureau but I happen to live in the Bay area and its universally agreed here that San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose metropolitan area is considered to be a whole consolidated area. therefore it is a FACT that San Jose is actually considered to be part of the ] <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 03:46, 6 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Thanks! :D == | |||
| {| class="ambox" style="text-align:center;" | |||
| |rowspan="3"|] | |||
| |<big><big><big>'''Thanks {{PAGENAME}}''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |<big>I would like to thank you for your participation in my successful RfA, which passed with a tally of (44/10/5)<sup><small>]]</small></sup>. Whether you supported, opposed or were neutral in my RfA, I appreciate your participation and I hope that we can continue to work together to build a stronger and better Misplaced Pages. | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="text-align:right;"|<br><big>Regards, ]<sup>]]]<span class="plainlinks"></span></sup> 04:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi Chrishomingtang. Thanks for you contributions. Unfortunately, I'd like to alert you to the following point from the AWB rules: | |||
| *Avoid making insignificant or inconsequential edits such as only adding or removing some white space, moving a stub tag, converting some HTML to Unicode, removing underscores from links (unless they are bad links), or something equally trivial. This is because it wastes resources and clogs up watch lists. | |||
| Thanks. —<span style="color: red;">] (])</span> 03:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == AfDs == | |||
| Chris, I'm kind of concerned that you jumped the gun with setting up multiple AfDs with such a short explanation in "per WP:OR". I don't believe that WP:OR stands alone as an argument because it can be considered proper to write neutrally while drawing from primary sources, such as implementing plot summaries. You can see my extensive argument ], which was necessary to basically cover all the bases from the beginning. At ], one editor even says, "Even the nominator doesn't offer a good reason to delete it." I won't be providing recommendations at these AfDs -- based on their outcome, I will revisit these articles in 6 months and make a more detailed argument. You have to present such AfDs in a manner in which people find it hard to submit a keep vote. I hope you understand. —] (] • ]) - 05:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Why is adding my blog considerd vandalism? == | |||
| I have been trying to add my blog as an external link for the Golden State Warriors but you have removed and flagged it as vandalism. Can you please provide me with an explanation as to why you consider my blog to be vandalism? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 22:42, 12 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| === Why allow other blog links but not mine? === | |||
| Can you please tell me why my addition to the external links was removed and what I can do to legally add the link I have been trying to add. I would like to follow the rules but I would also like the same rights to exists that the other blogs have seemed to have been granted but I for some reason unexplained to me have been denied. I look forward to hearing back from you. | |||
| You have no right now to keep removing the external link to the Blog. I have read the rules and will cite them if need be. You cited the rule: | |||
| "Sites that violate the copyrights of others per contributors' rights and obligations should not be linked. " | |||
| So I followed the terms and fixed the Blog. Even though both the other external links have violated the same exact rule you cited. This is unjust I ask you show some compassion as I have continued to try and appease your relentless effort to remove my additions. I only wonder what your motive is for this? <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 01:39, 13 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| If you are going to continue this stubborn behavior at least let me know why? I have met the guidlines you have no basis. Please explain your intentions. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 02:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ==Hi Chris (from Godisender)== | |||
| Thanks for evening out the Ocean Park page, and sorry for over criticizing it. But I think we should still leave the price increase in, because to Hong Kongers it was pretty big news as it made its tickets almost as much as HKDL. The reason why I put the 14 rides thing on the criticism page was because Ocean Park claims it has 30+ attractions when it only has 14. DO you think it's possible to somehow say that without harming the neutrality of the page? Thanks a lot, | |||
| Godisender <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Your hollow threats regarding the edit war there is not solving anything. Please try to actually resolve the problem instead of linking to ] wherever you go. Happy editing! --''']''' 21:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]'s Nobel Prize and Oscar Award== | |||
| To: ] and ] | |||
| From: ] | |||
| Re: ] | |||
| Hi. I noticed your edits to the Miscellaneous Records section of the ]s article, in which you indicate that "Al Gore really did not win an Oscar" in your edit summary box. Nonetheless, the substantive edit in the article states: "George Bernard Shaw is the only person to have been awarded both an Oscar and a Nobel Prize. Al Gore is arguably the second person to have been awarded both a Nobel Prize (the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 shared with Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) and an Oscar (presented by Davis Guggenheim, director of the Academy Award winning An Inconvenient Truth, in 2007)." I am pretty confused about this situation ... and this wording in the article is even more confusing. Did Gore win an Oscar or not? If he did ... or even if he did not ... why is his status "arguable"? Please reply at my Talk Page and clear this up for me. Please reply -----> ]. Thanks. (] 04:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)) | |||
| :May I comment here? I was also under the impression that Gore won an Oscar, and that last week he joined the exclusive GBS club of Oscar/Nobel winners. I even made edits to both Gore's and GBS's articles saying this. '''But''' I was reverted and informed that Gore did not win an Oscar. The Oscar was awarded to the director of ''An Inconvenient Truth'' (whatever his name is), not to Gore. Gore got all the attention and the limelight, and he joined the production team on the stage at the Oscars ceremony, and it was widely reported that "Al Gore's film ''AIT'' has won the Oscar for Best Documentary" - so it's perhaps understandable why he was often referred to as an "Oscar-winner", but that is simply not the case. Either he was awarded an Oscar, or he wasn't - there's no middle ground with "arguably" etc. He wasn't awarded an Oscar. The Oscar-winning director (whatever his name is) must be fuming - could 1 person out of 1000 name him? | |||
| :This reminds me of another case where misinformation was perpetuated for years. When I was at school, I was told, many times, that Australia's first Oscar winner was the photographer ], who supposedly won the 1942 Best Documentary Oscar for '']''. This was something that every Aussie kid knew, because Parer was an icon in 1950s Australia, having been killed on duty in the Pacific while filming our boys in action against the enemy (he's a lot less remembered these days). But it was never true. The film that won that Oscar was produced by ], and Hall was the one who was awarded the Oscar. When I first heard this, I said "Ken G ''who''?". But it's true. -- ] 05:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :: Hello, Jack of Oz. Sorry that it has taken so long for me to reply back to you -- but lately I have been pretty busy with "real life" (i.e., non-Wiki life). Yes, you may comment here ... your comments are appreciated ... and, in fact, I was glad to get some input on this very issue. I had suspected all along exactly the scenario that you described. That is, Gore never really won that Oscar -- it was just sort of hyped up that way in the media. And, I agree -- no middle ground -- no "arguably" -- Gore either did or did not ... and, in this case, he did not. But, I wanted to give the original poster the benefit of the doubt, and -- as such -- I asked them to clarify this point for me ... just in case there was something that I was missing / unaware of. At this point, I am going to revert and/or edit the ] article to reflect the actual scenario ... that is, George Bernard Shaw is the only winner of both an Oscar and a Pulitzer ... and Gore is not. Thanks for your input -- it is appreciated. Thanks! (] 19:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)) | |||
| == Thanks for the heads up == | |||
| I remember when I first got AWB, I know it specified not to just do it if it was blank spaces, but I didn't remember it being quite this specific. If you'll notice my history, I don't edit often anymore, and it's partially rules like this (or stuff like the discouraging of trivia sections or the many deletionists) that make me choose not to. This site is really good for information, but it's also by far one of the worst websites as far as discouraging information and improving web pages. Things shouldn't be taken nearly as seriously as people do (it's the Internet, after all), but clearly this is only getting worse. I sorta expected I might get a response about this, but figured I might not since no one's mentioned it before. Thought if I did, I'd just go on and give up editing anything else, so there it ends. ] 02:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free media (Image:24617f.jpg)== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, it is currently ], meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. ] if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "]" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described on ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Orphaned --> ] 15:48, 20 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Removal of RfC on Ghosttown talk page == | |||
| Just thought you might want to know that Alansohn removed the RfC you put up, in . Since I'm apparently being quarantined there, maybe it's better if you put it back up (and perhaps warn him about such behavior while you're at it). +] 06:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Of possible interest== | |||
| ], since you too were a target of that link. Thank you, by the way, for making an eloquent case on that rather dispiriting discussion. ] 01:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Two things: one, that's a meta.wikipedia essay, so we don't have the power to do that over here. Two, even though I'm not a big fan of it either, it's regarded as a basic guideline and is ''much'' better known, making deletion far more difficult. So I would support an eventual deletion or at least discussion, but I suggest sticking to smaller, more winnable battles for the time being. ] 03:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == MfD of historic pages == | |||
| re: ] | |||
| I'd like to officially warn you to not attempt to delete historic pages '''for whatever reason''' in future. | |||
| The reason for this is that we need to keep a complete historic record of how wikipedia is/was managed. Deleted information is . --] 22:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Invite! == | |||
| {{User:Goodshoped35110s/Wikipedia:Wikiproject Streets of San Francisco/Invite}} | |||
| == Your title change proposal == | |||
| I've left a note on ]. - ] 05:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Revert == | |||
| I am not the other person reverting your changes, don't get paranoid. I am in California today. North of you. Even though we differ on certain topics, I still respect your knowledge. --] 02:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] Article == | |||
| Good work on the ] article! It's an essential piece of San Francisco history that has been sorely missing from Misplaced Pages.] 14:03, 2 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Please explain which of the links in the article are actually ] from which an article about the song can be written. ] 22:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Milestone home runs == | |||
| You may have an opinion on ].--] <small>(]/]/]/]) </small> 14:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I don't know what that guys problem is but I just wanted to say thanks for your comment about me there. - ] 16:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you for un-doing what user "ILike2BeAnonymous" did to my changes. I do not know who this person thinks who he/she is. Thanks for the help! <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 08:32, 11 November 2007 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of how the average Misplaced Pages reader is currently moving == | |||
| I just wanted to say that I thought your comment that my science article was: "an unencyclopedic piece of garbage. I can't believe we are discussing this." was totally out-of-line and rude. I would hope that if you have such strong feeling you could specifically add comments on what was "unencyclopedic" about it. That statement is not helpful and undermines the "]" process upon which ] is built. Misplaced Pages is such a broad project that what might seem obviously strange and unencyclopedic to an editor of the type of articles that you edit, might be very ordinary and obviously encyclopedic to people with other interests and backgrounds. ] 04:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Edits to Steve Kerr == | |||
| A while back you made an edit that stated Kerr '''was''' a commentator for TNT and that he had retired. Do you think it would be appropriate you change this because he is so far still commentating. I dont know what is going on or when he will leave but i heard his voice during a recent telecast. I dont live in America so dont have access to TNT, can you help me out whats going on with him. ] 04:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == ] has been created! == | |||
| Some time ago, you showed support for the creation of such a WikiProject. It has now been created, active immediately. Your name has been automatically included in the list of participants. If you do not wish to participate, please remove your name from the list. Sorry for the inconvienience — <sub>]</sub>]<sup>]</sup> 12:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Great Barrier Reef == | |||
| I'm not sure that I can agree with you on the importance of the Great Barrier Reef. I think that it should be of high importance — I mean, it is listed under all four natural criteria! <sub>]</sub>]<sup>]</sup> 23:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Mediation == | |||
| A ] has been filed with the ] that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at ], and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Misplaced Pages, please refer to ]. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, ''']''' 01:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Here you go... == | |||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata" id="rfa" style="margin: 0 5%; padding: 0 7px 7px 7px; background: #FFFAEF; border: 1px solid #999999; text-align: left; font-size:95%;"> | |||
| '''] would like to nominate you to become an administrator.''' Please visit ] to see what this process entails, and then ] to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at ''']'''. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.</div> -]]]]] 17:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Two optional questions waiting. I recommend you answer them, I mean, you're at 44%! -]]]]] 19:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == RfA == | |||
| Chris, | |||
| I have added a question to your RfA. Cheers, ]] 17:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Your RfA was unsuccessful== | |||
| I am sorry to inform you that I have closed your RfA early as realistically it was no longer capable of succeeding. Do not be too disheartened - many of our finest admins were unsuccessful on their first attempt. I hope you will take onboard the concerns raised by those opposing and will consider running again in the future when you have more experience. Best wishes, <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 17:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, mine too. Don't worry, maybe you'll get it next time. I tried twice, and both times I've failed. -]]]]] 04:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Request for mediation accepted== | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="width:90%" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |A ] to which you were are a party has been ].<br>You can find more information on the case subpage, ].</center><br> | |||
| ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' ''']''' 17:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| <small><center>This message delivered by ], an automated bot account ] by the ] to perform case management.<br>If you have questions about this bot, please ].</small></center> | |||
| == Christians in China == | |||
| Hi! In your opinion, how many Christians are there in China? | |||
| We have some problems in making NPOV the articles ] and ] because there are two users/missionaries that continue to rollback their POV version. --] (]) 18:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Congratulations! == | |||
| You have made me laugh out loud! Thanks to your witty sense of humor, I have added a quote of yours to my page, forever preserving it for posterity. Consider this a great compliment, as I only add one or two quotes per month. Great work, happy editing! Click ] to view your quote. Thanks, ] | ] 20:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Happy Holidays! == | |||
| <div style="padding: 5px; background:#801818; border-style: solid; border-width: 2px; border-color:#FF7F50; font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif; font-size: 100%; "> | |||
| <center> | |||
| <div style="margin-top: 3px; padding-top: 9px; padding-bottom: 9px; padding-left: 9px; padding-right: 9px; width: 400px; float: center;">]</div> | |||
| </center> | |||
| <div class="NavFrame" style="padding: 0px; border-style: none; font-size: 100%;"> | |||
| <div class="NavFrame" style="padding: 0px; border-style: none;"> | |||
| <div class="NavHead" style="background: #228B22; text-align: center;"><font color="#000000">Open your card →→→</font></div> | |||
| <div class="NavContent" style="display: none; text-align: center;"> | |||
| <font color="#000000"><big>Happy Holidays from ]]<font color="red">]</font> <font color="black">]!</font><br> | |||
| <font color="#000000">If you live in San Francisco, this is located at 21st west of Church.</font> | |||
| Credits: This card was inspired by ]], assistant of ]</big></big> | |||
| </font></font></div></div></div></div> | |||
| —]]<font color="red">]</font> <font color="black">]</font> 00:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:41, 19 December 2007
Stop reverting correct additions, you stupid fucking faggot.