Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 03:46, 5 January 2008

Archives

1. December 2006
2. March 2007
3. April 2007
4. May 2007
5. June 2007
6. July 2007
7. August 2007
8. September 2007
9. October 2007
10. November 2007

Jeff Cook (basketball)

Regarding my reversion of your reversion: there is no basketball-specific category for Idaho State, so I think it's fair to put Cook in the general alumni category. Zagalejo^^^ 22:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Perfect season

I'm sure you've just watched the Pats go to 16-0 with a 38-35 win over the Giants. New York Dreams (talk) 04:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Dammit! I wanted to get here first! Well, doesn't matter who got here first, they won! J-ſtan_{User page} 05:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, indeed. Thanks. Pats1 /C 05:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Quite a feat, innit? Cheers mate! gaillimh 06:01, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Nostradamus! Pats1 /C 06:02, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

2008 pats season

You deleted it. I understand there's a rule against recreation of deleted articles..but it was a very good article that you deleted. In addition, it will probably be recreated again - possibly by yourself. So the question is, what's the point? --n1yaNt 06:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Yes, that was what I was aiming for to clean it up and such. That's why I came back to fix it up, change the grammar, discourse, etc. Oh well, I'll remake it after they go to the Super Bowl, hopefully you won't find any grounds to delete it then. And if you do, let me know and I'll try to fix it before you delete it, again. --n1yaNt(~Cpt. Obvious~) 20:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Tyler Palko

You did a bunch of work on the Tyler article after a dispute took place. I left it alone until this morning but another editor is undoing some of your changes, and mine, that were references and other wording. The article is already tagged as needing references and the intermittent editor is adding more information without sources. I said something but apparently since I am "not part of the NFL project" I am not taken seriously as an editor by the men editing the NFL (something I was told, not something I believe). Can you give the article a look. I'm trying to find more references, but it is hard to add references to someone else's additions who refuses to add them. I believe Street20 is the editor's name, but I'm not positive without looking and then editing your page again, which tends to piss people off. Thanks for your help.KellyAna (talk) 17:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Im glad...

... that you made this reversion before I saw the comment, cause my reply would have invovled the phrases "condescending prick" and "buy a GD dictionary." :) Also, congrats on the perfect season. Cheers. youngamerican (wtf?) 23:52, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the help

I appreciate your help on the articles that I've created and maintained, mainly the Chiefs articles (History..., 2007 season..., and the main Chiefs article). It shows that even Pats and Chiefs fans hold utmost respect for eachother : ) Thanks again! Conman33 03:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Haha yeah we're looking forward to next year here. The #4 pick is always a good thing. Hopefully they can top what the Pats did this year haha. Conman33 05:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

2007 Playoffs

Why did you delete all the game data boxes for next week's wildcard games? 69.210.252.204 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 21:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

André Davis

RE: “not what the highlights box is for”

The heading in the box is “Career Highlights and Awards.” I’m pretty sure that returning two consecutive kickoffs for touchdowns could be considered a career highlight, especially since it has only been done seven times. If I’m misinterpreting “career highlights,” please explain. Thanks —Travis 15:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

• Hmmm... Maybe the header should be changed to “Career Records and Awards” to avoid future confusion. —Travis 15:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

New field for infobox

I was thinking of adding a new field to the infobox. I'm pretty sure it's a good idea, I just don't know where it should go. I'm thinking it should say something like "Status:" or "Roster Status:" And essentially just put Active, Practice Squad, Suspended, or whatever reserve list the guy is on. The Team History section, even with the asterisks, doesn't always fully explain a guy's current status, so I feel this would be a good, contributing addition. So where should this go? Under the guy's position, perhaps? Or do you have any other ideas?►Chris Nelson 19:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, sounds good. Anywhere is fine, I guess. Pats1 /C 20:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

I'm sorry Pats1, I made some harsh claims and was uncivil. RC-0722 is my best friend and I really don't think he intentionally did any thing wrong. Being new myself, I haven't fully learned all policies yet, but I'm learning them quickly. Please forgive me. Happy New Year! Burner0718 (talk) 04:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

RC-0722

Why was my account blocked? 76.250.130.129 (talk) 21:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Problem at Ted Ginn, Jr.

Yo, can you help me out at Ginn's page? An IP editor keeps removing an appropriate trivia tag. See the last discussion on the article's talk page for more info. Thanks.►Chris Nelson 02:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Dude, I have called for arbitration in dispute resolution. Please call an admin who is not biased and is not a "dude" of Chris Nelson. Mr. nelson has behaved pretty rudly now and in the past (he has been suspended in the past). The other two objectors have also been quite rude to other recently. One kept changing your edits on the Pats 2007 season. I think there are rules and all I ask is that they be followed. I have read the Wikie rules on trivia and the list is fin as it stands. Styles can vary. So, please call an adminstator to arbitrate this and I would apprecite you not throwing a threat around like you did. I found it to be essential vandalism because you clearly didn't have time to investigate, you, apparantly, just listed listened to your "dude" and perhaps---PERHAPS abused your power.72.0.36.36 (talk) 03:02, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Now, I call on you to contact an administrator immediately. I have not broken any Wiki rules. You may very well have. You threats are unfounded, there is no reason for you to just take your "Dudes" side, you have not contacted me in a reasonable manner, you came at mewith nothing but threats when you had just a few moments to discern what was going on. How long was it aftter your "dude" asked you to do something that you just did it?. I have not broken the 3 revert rule and I have a legitimate concern about you behavior here. Please response as soon as you are able and please respons in a nice, reasonable, wiki-firendly tone, you are supposed to have certain responsibilites and I ask that you address them, Please. Thank you.72.0.36.36 (talk) 03:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

I have reported your behavior to dispute resolution. I told what I thought went wrong and you may tell your version.

Ted Ginn, Jr. I request an dispute resolution on this issue. I found an artice that I had reason to think had an inappropriate tiuvia tag. It was disputed. The three onjectors have a track record of being rude and ugly. One of them, a Chis Nelson, then contacted an administrator who now, rather than be a reasoned authority, I think, threated me ability to edit. When he did this, I had already requested dispute resolution and he did it anyway. he did not post a note explaining any rules that I was breaking. I think this editor, Pats1 may have abused his/her power by taking one person's side in a matter of moments, when he/she had little time to investigate. I may be unfamailair with some things and admit I am not perfect, but one I understood there were rules, I have been able to get along with folks. This, I think was abusive but a person who has the power to block me (as he'she claims). He should have looked and at least seen if my claims were valid before acting. Further, there was what lookied like a familiarity between Pats1 and ChisNelson. One that makes me question the objectivity of Pats1. It made me feel like it was "his way or the highway". I don't think that is the way disputes are supposed to be handled in WIKI, no? I thought there was consensus, there was dispute resolution and a 3 revert rule, a cooling off period. I posted this to Mr. Nelson and Pats1 but seemingly it was to no avail. I wish this matter to be looked into. thank you.72.0.36.36 (talk) 03:34, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

72.0.36.36 (talk) 03:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Possible abuse of power.

I have contacted wiki the best way i know how. If it is not the proper way then I ask that you follow-up and make sure it gets intp theright hands. Sonce you have chosen to make two threats, based on nothing, and have chosen not to contact me, I can only guess you will be silent and I find that unfortunate. However, I hope this can be reivewed quickly and reasonablly. This is nothign personal agaisnt you. I find your behavior offensive, not you personanlly. I think your behavior did not show good faith and was not up to wiki editor standards.

However, if you choose to answer. Please explain where and how you get the authority to threten a user with being banned. Who grants you that ability and where are the rule by which you must follow. I would like to read them, just as I read the rules on what triva tags are and are not supposed to be. Are you, with one with the power to ban, supposed to know those rules? I would like to know what your responsibilites are in this type of matter.72.0.36.36 (talk) 03:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)