Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:42, 9 January 2008

Archives

1, 2

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Bluemarine

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Bluemarine/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Bluemarine/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, John Vandenberg (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

In order to allow you to participate in the arbitration case, I have unblocked this account. Please refrain from editing any other pages at this time, otherwise I will block this account again, irrespective of whether the edits are constructive or disruptive.

If you have any queries about arbcom procedures or how to participate in the case effectively, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or email me if you feel that is necessary. John Vandenberg (talk) 07:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Just to clarify, the pages which you are allowed to edit are:

• Bluemarine (talk)
• User talk:Jayvdb
• Arbcom case pages excluding the Proposed decision page which is restricted to the committee members and clerks.

If you edit any other page, for any reason or in any manner, this account will be reblocked. Also, you should remain civil and avoid unnecessary drama; disruptive behavior on these pages may result in the account being reblocked. (see Don't moon the jury). John Vandenberg (talk) 11:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I have blocked your account. The parameters of the unblock were clear, and you violated them. Not only that, but you havent used the unblock to participate in the case.

As a result, you are now being restrained and gagged so to speak. You may only participate in the case by writing notes on your own talk page, indicating where you would like it placed on the arbcom pages.

Please be clear, so as to not waste my time. (see Don't moon the jury). John Vandenberg (talk) 09:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Advocacy offer

Due to the seriousness of the issues involved in your ArbCom case, I would like to offer to advise and assist you (informally) on the conduct of the case and (where appropriate) to make representations to the Arbitrators on your behalf. We don't have lawyers on Misplaced Pages, so I will not necessarily be fighting your corner against all accusations, but I do think that you are entitled to fair advice and representation, in order to ensure that the outcome of the case is as fair as possible; as an experienced Misplaced Pages user, I believe I am qualified. If you choose to accept my help, you can reply here (since the Committee has told you not to edit other pages) and we can discuss your present position. Walton 16:50, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Another form totalitarianism

By the thought police. Matt Sanchez (talk) 09:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

My offer to help still stands. Since you can no longer edit the ArbCom pages, I can place notes and responses there on your behalf if you wish. Do you want my help or not? Walton 09:29, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

• Bluemarine was specifically instructed not to edit any page but those listed above by User:Jayvdb. You broke the term, you deal with the consequences.
• Regarding your offer to help, Walton One, he can reply to everything on his talk page (as standard ArbCom policy dictates). You could, of course, copy his responses to the appropriate pages, provided that you do a link-back to Bluemarine's original statement. - Penwhale | 09:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Can't you guys talk somewhere else, or are you claiming I don't have authority over this talk page either?

• As an arbitration clerk, I'm here to let you know that even though you are blocked, you can still reply and someone will post your response onto the appropriate pages. Other than that, I'm not suggesting anything. - Penwhale | 09:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Homosexual Agenda

There's plenty of proof that homosexual activists see:Homosexual agenda are interested in creating a biased article against me. Much of the criticism and edits to the article attempt to emphasize gay sex in a virtual version of fag bashing. Matt Sanchez (talk) 09:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Is this part of your statement to Arbcom? If so, I suggest that you draft it a little more. John Vandenberg (talk) 09:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Unblock parameters

You were unblocked to only participate in the arbcom case. Your block now expires 21:44, 12 January 2008. When it ends, do not edit outside the arbcom case. — Rlevse • Talk • 10:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Correction, when the block expires, you can edit outside arbcom. — Rlevse • Talk • 17:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)